Effect of Astym therapy versus kinesiotaping on rotator cuff tendinopathy in diabetic patients :RCT

Last registered on August 22, 2016

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Effect of Astym therapy versus kinesiotaping on rotator cuff tendinopathy in diabetic patients :RCT
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0001506
Initial registration date
August 22, 2016

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
August 22, 2016, 6:48 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
cairo university

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2014-08-20
End date
2016-08-20
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Background rotator cuff tendinopathy is a significant problem among diabetics, that frequently restricts patients activity in term of pain and disability. The purpose to compare the efficacy of Astym therapy and kinesio tape in diabetic patients with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy. Study Design: single blind randomized controlled trial .Subjects and methods 56 diabetic patients diagnosed with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy were randomly assigned into Astym therapy group (n=28) or kinesiotaping group (n= 28) . All patients received conventional program in the form of hot backs and exercise in addition to Astym treatment or Kinesiotaping for 12 sessions (2times/week). Patients were assessed at baseline and at the end of corresponding intervention with visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, shoulder disability questioner (SDQ) for shoulder disability, and electrogoniometer for shoulder range of motion. Results For the 56 study participants (21 males and 35 females; mean age=41.9±6.9) years there were significant differences were detected in VAS and SDQ scores in both group when compared to baseline (p<0.05). Between group comparison showed a significant reduction in VAS score and SDQ score in the kinesiotaping group compared to the Astym therapy group. Range of motion measures showed no significant changes within or between groups after treatment (p > 0.05). Conclusion kinesiotaping appears to be more effective than Astym therapy in reducing pain and shoulder disability for diabetic patients with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy .
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Atya, Azza and Mahmoud M. Nasser. 2016. "Effect of Astym therapy versus kinesiotaping on rotator cuff tendinopathy in diabetic patients :RCT." AEA RCT Registry. August 22. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.1506-1.0
Former Citation
Atya, Azza and Mahmoud M. Nasser. 2016. "Effect of Astym therapy versus kinesiotaping on rotator cuff tendinopathy in diabetic patients :RCT." AEA RCT Registry. August 22. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/1506/history/10302
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
All patients received conventional program in the form of hot backs and exercise in addition to Astym treatment or Kinesiotaping for 12 sessions (2times/week).
Intervention Start Date
2015-08-20
Intervention End Date
2016-04-20

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
kinesiotaping appears to be more effective than Astym therapy in reducing pain and shoulder disability for diabetic patients with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
56 diabetic patients diagnosed with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy were randomly assigned into Astym therapy group (n=28) or kinesiotaping group (n= 28) . All patients received conventional program in the form of hot backs and exercise in addition to Astym treatment or Kinesiotaping for 12 sessions (2times/week). Patients were assessed at baseline and at the end of corresponding intervention with visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, shoulder disability questioner (SDQ) for shoulder disability, and electrogoniometer for shoulder range of motion
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
computer
Randomization Unit
a random-number generator and allocation was concealed
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
no
Sample size: planned number of observations
56
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
56 patients
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials