Worker Preferences for Peers and Job Formality in Brazil

Last registered on January 22, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Worker Preferences for Peers and Job Formality in Brazil
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015246
Initial registration date
January 20, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 22, 2025, 8:47 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
German Institute for Global and Area Studies

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Potsdam

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-01-22
End date
2025-02-24
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study examines workers' preferences for job characteristics, focusing on two key attributes: the socio-demographic composition of coworkers and formal employment status. Using a discrete choice experiment with 5,000 currently employed workers in Brazil, we investigate individuals' willingness to pay (WTP) for working with same-race and same-gender peers and for formal employment contracts. The experiment presents participants with pairs of hypothetical job offers that randomly vary in workplace characteristics, including coworker composition, formality status, and wages. To understand the mechanisms behind racial coworker preferences, we collect data on general racial attitudes, beliefs about the benefits of working with same-race peers, and experiences of racial discrimination and harassment at work. Additionally, we examine how information about the costs and benefits of formal employment affects workers' valuation of formal contracts. This research contributes to our understanding of coworkers and formality as potentially important job amenities valued by workers.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Fietz, Katharina and Aiko Schmeißer. 2025. "Worker Preferences for Peers and Job Formality in Brazil." AEA RCT Registry. January 22. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15246-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
See experimental design.
Intervention Start Date
2025-01-22
Intervention End Date
2025-02-24

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Choices between two hypothetical jobs with varying attributes
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The experiment is designed to estimate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for workplace characteristics in Brazil, specifically focusing on the socio-demographic coworker composition and formal employment status.

The study consists of an online survey with three main components. First, participants answer questions about their socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, race, education, family status, state of residence) and the characteristics of their current job (tenure, wage, hours worked, occupation, size of workplace, signed work card, schedule flexibility, teamwork, lunch with coworkers, work from home option). Additionally, we randomly assign half of the participants to receive information about the costs and benefits of formal employment.

Second, the core experiment builds on the design of Maestas et al. (2023) and presents participants with ten pairs of hypothetical job offers. In each pair, the jobs vary in their wage, the team composition, and in two other selected non-wage attributes (signed work card, schedule flexibility, teamwork, lunch with coworkers, or work from home option). We randomly vary the wage differences between job options by anchoring the wages to the participant's current reported wage. Specifically, we set the wages as multiplicative factors of the current wage that follow a normal distribution centered at 1 with a standard deviation of 0.1 and are truncated to lie between 0.75 and 1.25. The team composition will be signaled through six randomly chosen AI-generated photos of team members. The AI tool manipulates the skin tone of given faces (white, brown, or black), and we will randomly draw the depicted skin tones for each team member.

To account for potential inattention, we include attention checks by presenting choices between two jobs that are exactly the same in all characteristics and asking the participants to select neither. This allows us to estimate and correct for inattention rates in our WTP calculations.

Third, following the job choices, participants complete a detailed questionnaire about workplace interactions, friendship networks, general racial attitudes, beliefs about the benefits of working with same-race colleagues, and experiences of racial discrimination and harassment at work. In addition, we ask participants about which aspect of formality they value most and test their knowledge about formality by asking specific questions regarding the costs and benefits of having a formal contract.

The survey targets 5,000 currently employed workers in Brazil, spanning both formal and informal employees, recruited through an online survey platform.

See pre-analysis plan for details.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization of the job choice attributes and information treatment is done online by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Individuals and jobs
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
5,000 respondents
Sample size: planned number of observations
50,000 choices (each respondent makes 10 choices between two hypothetical jobs)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
2,500 individuals receive the information treatment
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
German Institute for Global and Area Studies, Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2025-01-10
IRB Approval Number
1/2025
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

PAP_Fietz_Schmeißer.pdf

MD5: 62b0fb970040dd188b1022824b659617

SHA1: 4e3bb40e3e2de649b5d5f83010f68e83b0c05a03

Uploaded At: January 20, 2025