Does the recipient matter? Experimental evidence on the impact of changing cash transfers from married men to their spouses in Ethiopia

Last registered on March 26, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Does the recipient matter? Experimental evidence on the impact of changing cash transfers from married men to their spouses in Ethiopia
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015357
Initial registration date
March 21, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 26, 2025, 9:32 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
World Bank

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Paris School of Economics
PI Affiliation
IFPRI
PI Affiliation
World Bank
PI Affiliation
Paris School of Economics

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-06-24
End date
2026-06-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
While cash transfer programs commonly target women with the aim of enhancing household well-being and child outcomes, the effectiveness of this strategy remains uncertain. Existing studies indicate divergent impacts when altering the recipient of cash transfers, suggesting that context and prevailing gender norms play an important role. Complementary interventions could help increase women’s participation in economic decisions and control over resources. Furthermore, evidence on the impact of gender targeting in public work programs is lacking. This design note outlines a randomized controlled trial in Ethiopia’s rural Productive Safety Net program, that aims to assess the impact of switching the recipient of public work transfers within married households from the household head to the spouse. The study will also assess the impact of complementary budget planning activities for couples and/or groups of women. The study seeks to shed light on the effectiveness of such interventions in enhancing household welfare and women’s empowerment in safety net programs.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Abate, Gashaw T. et al. 2025. "Does the recipient matter? Experimental evidence on the impact of changing cash transfers from married men to their spouses in Ethiopia ." AEA RCT Registry. March 26. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15357-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention (Hidden)
Public work and PSNP transfer: The 15 selected married male-headed households will continue to participate in public works and receive PSNP transfers based on the household size. The public work transfers will be paid to the respective beneficiaries according to their treatment assignment. Households belonging to the 141 control kebeles will continue receiving the PSNP transfer through the beneficiary originally designated, while married male-headed households in the 282 treatment kebeles will receive the transfer through the woman spouse. The PSNP transfer will be done in cash monthly.

Communication campaign: The first communication campaign was conducted at the kebele level between June and August 2024, and a refresher will be provided prior to the first public work payment of calendar year 2025. All PSNP5 households in treatment kebeles will be sensitized about the objective of the transfers, and the rationale for changing the transfer recipient to women. This will ensure everyone in the kebele is informed about the change in recipient, reinforce the idea that women can manage the money, and make it more acceptable to husbands. The campaign will be accompanied by posters and brochures translated into local languages (Amharic, Oromiffa and Somali) to illustrate the objectives of the change in recipient, in terms of household welfare improvements in the domains of education, health and nutrition. The communication materials will be posted in public places, such as the Kebele office, Cooperatives, and other public areas.

Budget planning activities for groups of women, couples, or both: Households in treatment kebeles (see empirical strategy below) will either participate in budget planning activities in a group of women, in a budget planning activity as a couple, or in both. The content of the activities has been developed collaboratively with the researchers, FSCO, and the firm contracted for the delivery of the training. The activities are expected to maximize the positive impact of the change in transfer recipient and reduce the risks of backlash through gender-based violence (GBV) including but not limited to intimate partner violence (IPV).

- Budget planning activity for groups of women: this will consist in a two-hours discussion session delivered to groups of a target number of 15 women per kebele. The topics will mostly cover women's financial goal setting (see Figure A.3 for examples of the materials used). Women will discuss spending priorities and evaluate the total cash they will have in hand every month, adding the PSNP transfer to their other sources of cash income. The objective is to ensure women understand how much money they will have to manage and are ready to use this money when they get it, and to lead to an effective change in who manages the money.

- Couple’s budget planning activity: this will consist in a one hour facilitated couple discussion delivered individually to seven couples per kebele. Facilitators will visit each couple in their dwelling. The intervention will facilitate a goal setting discussion between couples about household finances (see Figure A.5 for examples of the materials used). The objective is to provide a neutral platform for partners to negotiate and coordinate the use of their cash transfers and reduce the risk of tensions within the household.

Savings information: Early qualitative work conducted by the research team indicated that it was common practice to encourage PSNP beneficiaries to save part of their monthly transfers in a savings account. In addition, beneficiaries had little information about the amount of money they had already saved in the account, and their investment goals often seemed disconnected from what they could realistically do with the amounts of money they had actually saved. This inspired the savings information intervention. All households will be asked to provide information of their current and past savings, and how they plan to use them. The savings information intervention will be implemented with half of the sample (stratified by treatment status for main intervention described above) including control households, during the first wave of the high frequency surveys. It will consist in calculating the total amount of money households have saved so far, and providing feedback on how realistic the household’s investment goals are in relation to their current savings patterns. In addition, households will be encouraged to think about alternative and less ambitious investment goals, in case they fail to meet their primary goal. The objective is to assess whether providing that information encourages beneficiaries to save more, to revisit their investment goals towards more realistic options, or to redirect savings toward consumption if they realize their savings goals are not realistic. Including households from the control group will enable us to test whether traditional recipients of the PSNP transfers (male heads of households) react differently to the savings information compared to the new recipients in the main intervention groups (spouses). In each kebele, while the information on the total amount of savings accumulated will always be provided to the couple, the feedback on realism of the investment goals will be provided to the couple for half of the households selected randomly, and to the wife of the household head only in the other half of the sample. This will enable us to test whether the recipient of the information matters.
Intervention Start Date
2024-12-23
Intervention End Date
2025-06-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Primary outcomes are the key goal of the PSNP transfers and the change in transfer recipient, and complementary training – these include consumption, food security and nutrition (including dietary diversity), women empowerment indicators (including mental health and intimate partner violence), and children’s outcomes.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Food Security : Food consumption, Household Food consumption score (FCS), Food gap, Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES)
Nutrition: Household dietary diversity score (HDDS), Minimum dietary diversity for women (MDD-W)
Children’s nutritional outcomes: Minimum dietary diversity score for one child 6-23 months old (MDD-IYCF),
Minimum dietary diversity score for one older child
Women empowerment: Self-efficacy, Other measures of women empowerment, e.g., motivational autonomy, locus of control, Physical mobility, Household decision-making, Norms about women’s participation in decision-making

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Children outcomes, participation in public works, intrahousehold transfers and finances, mental health, GBV, couple satisfaction
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Our experimental sample will consist of 423 kebeles (selected among PSNP kebeles) distributed across 32 woredas and 3 regions. The study kebeles will be randomly assigned to several treatment arms with a stratification at the woreda (and kebele) level, each with a distinct set of interventions, and a control group to establish a credible counterfactual for comparison. 15 randomly selected households will also be randomly assigned to complementary treatment modalities in treatment kebeles, as detailed below.

In the control group (C), 141 randomly selected Kebeles (a third of the total) will not be subject to any additional intervention. All public work households will continue to participate in PSNP public works and receive transfers as per the standard operational manual.

Another set of 141 Kebeles will be randomly selected for the first Treatment Group (T1). All kebeles in this group will receive the Women Transfer (WT) and Communication Campaign (Comm). Within the Kebeles receiving WT and Comm, the main recipient of PSNP public work transfers will be changed from the head of the household to the spouse for all male headed married households (WT) and a community level communication campaign will be delivered. In each of those kebeles, 15 households will be randomly selected among married male-headed public work households. Seven of them (randomly selected) will participate in a Couple Budget Planning Activity to assess how involving couples in jointly prioritizing expenses can enhance the effects of WT and Comm (T1a), while the rest will not receive any additional intervention.

An additional 141 Kebeles will be randomly selected for the second Treatment Group (T2). All kebeles in this group will receive the Women Budget Planning Activity (WAct) interventions. In this group, the main recipient of PSNP public work transfers will be changed from the head of the household to the spouse for all male headed married households (WT) and a community level communication campaign will be delivered, WT + Comm. In addition, 15 households in each kebele will be randomly selected among married male-headed public work households to participate in the women group activity (WAct) to assess the impact of this additional intervention. Finally, in each kebele, 7 of the 15 households selected for the WT + Comm + WAct will also participate in the Couple Budget Planning Activity to evaluate the holistic impact of gender-focused interventions. The savings intervention is cross-randomized at the individual level on the whole sample, including controls.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
kebele level (WT + Comm and WT + Comm + Wact)
household level (Couple budget planning activity and savings information)
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
423 kebeles
Sample size: planned number of observations
6,345 households
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Across kebeles:
WT+Comm: 141 kebeles and 2,115 households
(WT+Comm) + WAct: 141 kebeles and 2,115 households
Control: 141 kebeles and 2,115 households

Within kebeles:
WT+Comm: 1,128 households
WT+Comm + Couple budget planning: 987 households

WT +Comm + WAct: 1,128 households
WT + Comm + WAct + Couple budget planning: 987

Savings: 3,384 households
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
details in the PAP
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Paris School of Economics Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2024-03-15
IRB Approval Number
2024-009
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials