Using Financial Incentives and Screening to Increase Engagement with Mental Health Services among College Students in Chennai, India

Last registered on February 19, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Using Financial Incentives and Screening to Increase Engagement with Mental Health Services among College Students in Chennai, India
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015379
Initial registration date
February 13, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 19, 2025, 9:26 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Harvard University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of California, Berkeley
PI Affiliation
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
PI Affiliation
Harvard University
PI Affiliation
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
PI Affiliation
University of Michigan

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2025-01-24
End date
2025-04-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of interventions to increase engagement with mental health services among a sample of college students in Chennai, India. We have partnered with an arts and science college for women in Chennai, where the study will be conducted. The sample will be recruited within classrooms, during college hours. We will introduce the study to all students present in the classroom per the alloted time and will obtain consent from those interested after screening them for age eligibility (between the ages of 18 and 30 years). Study participants will then complete a baseline survey including questions around demographics, perceptions of their own mental health, mental health treatment history, and the PHQ-ADS, a standardized composite screening tool for depression and anxiety. The experimental design is an RCT with 4 groups, randomized at the individual level: (1) a control group, which will watch a video with information about mental health and be able to access therapy in college and at SCARF, a mental health center in Chennai, at no cost for the duration of the study; (2) a screening group, in which, in addition to the interventions in the control group, students will be informed whether their responses to the PHQ-ADS questions fit in the standard risk categories of no, mild, moderate, or severe distress and corresponding recommendations for whether to make an appointment with a counselor/therapist; (3) a rewards group, in which, in addition to the interventions in the control group, students will be provided with a cash payment for attending their first therapy session; and (4) a combined screening and rewards group. The investigators will measure interest in, and take-up of, therapy at the individual level.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Breza, Emily et al. 2025. "Using Financial Incentives and Screening to Increase Engagement with Mental Health Services among College Students in Chennai, India." AEA RCT Registry. February 19. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15379-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Treatments are randomized at the individual level, stratified by categories of PHQ-ADS scores. Treatment status will be revealed via the survey administered through students' mobile phones. Participants will be randomized to four conditions:

1. Control: the control group will (a) watch a video introducing them to the mental health services available in the college, including introductory videos of the counselors, (b) have access to therapy at no cost for the duration of the study via their college counselors and additionally at SCARF, a mental health center in Chennai, and (c) be given links to book a therapy session or download a mental health app.

2. Screening: in addition to the interventions in the control group, students in the screening group will receive feedback on their PHQ-ADS score and recommendations based on that. In particular, they will be informed whether their responses to the PHQ-ADS questions fit in the standard risk categories of no, mild, moderate, or severe distress and corresponding recommendations for whether to make an appointment with a counselor/therapist.

3. Rewards: in addition to the interventions in the control group, students in the rewards group will be provided with a cash payment of Rs.\ 500 (USD 5.70 at market exchange rates) for attending a (first) therapy session.

4. Screening and rewards: students in this group will receive both interventions, i.e., both the screening information and the reward described above.

For ethical reasons, participants with PHQ-ADS scores of 30 or above (indicating severe risk of depression and anxiety) in the non-screening treatment arms will also be informed of their scores at the end of the survey. For outcome variables measured within the survey, we will treat these participants as though they are part of the group to which they are randomly assigned. One outcome variable (completing the process to make an appointment for therapy) is measured after the conclusion of the participant survey. For this outcome variable, we will separately run regressions both including and excluding these individuals.
Intervention Start Date
2025-01-24
Intervention End Date
2025-04-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
We have two primary outcomes:

1. Expressing interest in therapy. This consists of students answering ``yes'' when asked in the survey if they would like to book an appointment with a counselor, or if students answer ``yes'' when asked in the survey if they would like to be contacted by a study counselor to discuss mental health and therapy.

2. Making an appointment. If a student actually makes an appointment with a counselor (measured using the administrative records from the counseling offices)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
The secondary outcomes of the study include the following:

1. Take-up of mental health app. This is measured in two ways: participants expressing interest in accessing a mental-healthcare app in the survey, and participants actually clicking a link to download the app.

2. Demand for information about mental health. This is measured in two ways: participants expressing interest in receiving more information about mental health, and participants actually clicking a link to access the information.

3. Attendance of therapy sessions. We will collect data from the administrative records of the counselling office on whether participants actually attended a therapy session, as well as the number of sessions attended.

4. Other variables. We will also report exploratory analyses and mechanism tests including: (i) whether participants report in the survey if they would consider seeking therapy in future; (ii) what steps they report they would take to take care of their mental health in future; (iii) reported motivating/inhibiting factors for taking up therapy and perceptions of therapy.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Individuals will be randomly assigned to treatment arms.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Treatments are randomized at the individual level, stratified by categories of PHQ-ADS scores. Treatment status will be revealed via the survey administered through students' mobile phones.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
We will attempt to visit all classrooms (i.e., all majors and years) over the course of the study. However, we rely on the college administration to make students available and scheduling constraints on the part of the college may keep us from visiting all classrooms. In addition, attendance rates on a given day are well below 100\% (and as low as 50% during our scoping visits). Thus, the final experimental sample will be substantially smaller than the full college student population of approximately 3000.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Approximately 3000 students, subject to the discussion above
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Equal shares in each treatment group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Assuming 3000 students in total, and a 10% level of take-up in the control group, the minimum detectable effect size is 3.28 percentage points
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Committee on the Use of Humans as Experimental Subjects
IRB Approval Date
2025-01-17
IRB Approval Number
2206000666
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Pre-Analysis Plan

MD5: 0270918d603d9fa57c0c76062f7c3f6e

SHA1: 267004cecc1536a7a9d057fb3c671bf9189e7cf1

Uploaded At: February 12, 2025