Worker vs Consumer: How Economic Identity Shapes Policy Preferences

Last registered on February 20, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Worker vs Consumer: How Economic Identity Shapes Policy Preferences
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015390
Initial registration date
February 16, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 20, 2025, 5:24 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Missouri

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-02-17
End date
2025-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This paper explores the dual economic identity that individuals embody as both consumers and workers and examines how these identities influence policy preferences. Using a new large online survey of US residents, I measure whether individuals identify more strongly as consumers or workers, their exposure to economic shocks, their political preferences, and a wide set of policy preferences, such as labor market policies, trade, immigration, and redistribution. I look at how identifying themselves more as a worker or as a consumer makes individual more or less in favor of policies favoring higher employment over lower inflation, trade restrictions, and more restrictive immigration policies, and whether this relationship is independent of their political affiliation. By employing a priming treatment, where I prompt respondents to reflect on the positive aspects of their job or of the things they consume, I causally identify the role of economic identity in shaping this broad array of policy preferences. Finally, I investigate how an individual's economic identity is shaped by significant life events, such as job promotions or job loss.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Ferroni, Matteo F.. 2025. "Worker vs Consumer: How Economic Identity Shapes Policy Preferences." AEA RCT Registry. February 20. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15390-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
I randomly assign respondents to one of two priming treatments (plus control group) with the goal on making them focus more on their role as workers or as consumers.
Intervention Start Date
2025-02-17
Intervention End Date
2025-05-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The key outcomes are a "worker vs consumer" index (aspirational and situational) and policy preferences in the following areas: i) inflation; ii) labor market; iii) trade; iv) immigration; v) role of government; vi) redistribution.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
The main variables (as shown in the attached survey questionnaire) are going to be aggregated in LDA indices to have an index for each of the above mentioned outcomes.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
I'm also interested i) economic expectations; ii) economic concerns; iii) economic beliefs; iv) attitudes towards their job; v) attitudes towards consumption; vi) life experiences and time allocation.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
These outcomes are computed using the questions as written in the attached survey questionnaire.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
After answering questions on their background characteristics, respodents will be randomly assigned to two different priming treatments. The first, will make them focus on their role as workers; the second, on their role as consumers.
After the treatment, all respodents will answer the same questions capturing the outcomes described above.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done by the survey (designed on Qualtrics)
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
3,000 individuale
Sample size: planned number of observations
3,000 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1,000 individuals in control group
1,000 individuals in "worker" treatment
1,000 individuals in "consumer" treatment
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Missouri-Columbia
IRB Approval Date
2025-01-27
IRB Approval Number
451729
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information