Peer Messaging as a Deterrent in Black Markets

Last registered on October 10, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Peer Messaging as a Deterrent in Black Markets
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015494
Initial registration date
October 06, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 10, 2025, 10:17 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Chicago

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Mannheim
PI Affiliation
University of Mannheim

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-07-18
End date
2026-05-15
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Illicit drug use and abuse is one of the leading causes of injury-related deaths in the U.S., and adverse health outcomes related to drug consumption continue to rise. Anti-drug curriculums, such as “Just Say No” proved to have little measurable deterrence effects, and thus interest groups are increasingly looking at other avenues to curb risky behavior. We partner with a popular web application called KnowDrugs to design a technology platform that provides salient information about drugs to users in real time. The purpose of the KnowDrugs app is to collect and summarize detailed real-time information about the chemical composition of popular illegal drugs; they gather this data from drug testing sites around the world. They then provide this information to app users so that they can can make safer or more informed consumption choices. The goal of our study is to help identify the content and form of information presentation that is the most effective in influencing safer consumption. We design two technology treatments – one that provides salient statistical information about a particular drug, and one that provides narrative and ratings-based experiences from drug user peers. We observe each groups’ interaction with this information and then measure each groups' effects on consumption behavior and health outcomes including such as adverse side effects. The outcome of our study will help inform policy interventions that may be designed to curb the drug problem.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Costello, Anna, Christian Friedrich and Gerrit von Zedlitz-Neukirch. 2025. "Peer Messaging as a Deterrent in Black Markets." AEA RCT Registry. October 10. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15494-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The baseline (control) group includes people who continue to see the generic information about popular illegal drugs (e.g., the current version of the app). The current version of the app allows users to click on individual drug checking results (e.g., test result #1 for MDMA), but does not provide any additional or contextual information such as aggregated statistics or user feedback.

We then have four treatment groups as follows:
(1) Statistical Treatment Group: In this treatment group, we provide salient statistical information about a particular drug. Specifically, we aggregate data from drug checking results to create clear and simple statistical facts, that we present at the drug-location-time level. For instance, we provide a histogram of dosage strength at the drug-category level (e.g., MDMA), for those pills that have been tested in a given city over the last 30 days. We then highlight the average dosage for a particular pill type (e.g., the green tesla, containing MDMA) over that same period, showing where the green tesla sits on the distribution of all tested MDMA pills.
(2) The second treatment group is a variant of treatment group (1), but in addition to providing statistical information, we provide a salient illustration of the source of the data that informs the statistics (e.g., official drug checking site X).
(3) Peer Treatment Group: In our third treatment group, we provide information about drugs and experiences related to drugs in the form of narrative and and ratings-based experiences from drug user peers.
(4) The fourth treatment group is a variant of treatment group (3), but in addition to providing narrative and rating-based experiences, we provide a salient illustration of the source of the data that informs the experiences (e.g., Peers).
Intervention Start Date
2025-10-09
Intervention End Date
2026-01-09

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The primary outcomes are obtained from user engagement with the app (where they click) and a survey instrument that is pushed to users after a weekend. The survey asks questions about drug consumption, experienced effects, safer use behavior, and comfort while taking the drug
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
As a secondary outcome, we measure how people like the additional information we provide by using a feedback button.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Working with the app developer and engineering team, we conduct four redesigns of the KnowDrugs app to reflect our four treatment arms described above. The new versions appear on the landing page of the app and can be fully engaged with. We maintain the current app interface for our control group.

Together with the owner of the app, we randomly assign app users to either the control group or one of the four treatment arms. Groups are assigned as follows: 10% of current app users are assigned to the control group, and the remaining 90% of current app users are equally split into the four treatment groups. Each app user has an ID, and we will use a random number generator to assign the app user ID to one of the four treatment groups or the control group. They will then only be able to view and engage with their assigned version of the app. Any individuals that download and use the app after the start of our experiment will be allocated to either the control or one of the four treatment groups upon joining.

The app automatically collects click data on that user behavior, which we will use as our outcome variables. We also provide an in-app survey, which is constantly available on the landing page of the app and users can fill it in as often as they want. The in-app survey collects other outcome variables related to user experiences.

Throughout the experiment, we will send weekly push notifications to encourage users to engage with the app. Those push notifications will be randomized based on night, so that we can reduce self-selection concerns related to endogenous timing of individual information acquisition.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
We randomize treatment by individual user.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
60,000 - 100,000 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
60,000 for app engagement data 1,320 for survey data
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
10% of the participants will be placed in the control group. The remaining 90% will be equally randomized into the four treatment arms (1, 1a, 2, 2a),
i.e.,
13,500 for app engagement data all treatments + 6,000 control group
300 for survey data all treatments + 120 control group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
All minimum detectable effect sizes based on a 10% significance level and 80% power level. All 5-point Likert scale survey items (expected standard deviation = 1.1): Minimum detectable effect size is: 0.23 points on the 5-point scale All other variables will be coded as dummies. For the power calculation, we assume the maximum standard deviation of 0.5, when the mean of the dummy variable is 0.5. Minimum detectable effect size is: 1.18 percentage points
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Chicago Social and Behavioral Sciences IRB
IRB Approval Date
2025-03-10
IRB Approval Number
IRB25-0353
IRB Name
University of Mannheim Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2025-02-28
IRB Approval Number
15/2025
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information