Fig-leafing and self-serving behavior

Last registered on March 19, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Fig-leafing and self-serving behavior
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015543
Initial registration date
March 14, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 19, 2025, 9:00 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Cologne

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Cologne
PI Affiliation
University of Helsinki
PI Affiliation
TU Freiberg

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-03-18
End date
2027-03-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We study the effects of allowing decision-makers to flip a coin when choosing between a prosocial and a self-serving outcome.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Apffelstaedt, Arno et al. 2025. "Fig-leafing and self-serving behavior." AEA RCT Registry. March 19. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15543-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
There are three between-subject treatments: (1) NoCoin, (2) PrivateCoin, and (3) BindingCoin. In NoCoin, the decision-maker chooses directly between the self-serving and the prosocial outcome. In PrivateCoin, the decision-maker is informed that they may privately flip a coin, but the coin flip is not observed. When selecting an outcome, they are asked whether they flipped a coin flip to decide. In BindingCoin, the decision-maker can delegate the decision to a computerized coin flip, which is observed and binding.
Intervention Start Date
2025-03-18
Intervention End Date
2025-05-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
There are two primary outcome variables: (1) Implemented Outcome: Which outcome was implemented (self-serving or prosocial)? (2) Coin flip report (only in treatment PrivateCoin): Whether the decision-maker says they flipped a coin (Yes/No).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This is an online experiment conducted with an adult sample (UK subjects) recruited on the platform Prolific. Participants are matched into pairs consisting of a decision maker and a passive receiver. The decision-maker chooses between two outcomes, where one (the self-serving outcome) yields a benefit for the decision-maker at the cost of the receiver, relative to the other (prosocial) outcome. Before making the decision, pairs are randomly assigned within session to one of three between-subject treatments using a computer draw.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Pairs of individuals (consisting of a decision-maker and a receiver) are assigned to treatments at the individual (pair) level using automated sequential randomization in Qualtrics, ensuring balanced allocation across treatments within each data collection session.
Randomization Unit
Pair of individuals (consisting of one decision-maker and one receiver)
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
1800 pairs (each consisting of one decision-maker and one receiver)
Sample size: planned number of observations
1800 pairs
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
600 pairs each treatment (NoCoin, PrivateCoin, BindingCoin)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Ethical Review Board of the Faculty of Management, Economics and Social Sciences at the University of Cologne
IRB Approval Date
2025-03-06
IRB Approval Number
240085BI
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information