The Buy-In Effect: When Increasing Initial Effort Motivates Behavioral Follow-Through - Willingness to Pay - Online Study

Last registered on April 22, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The Buy-In Effect: When Increasing Initial Effort Motivates Behavioral Follow-Through - Willingness to Pay - Online Study
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015585
Initial registration date
April 15, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 22, 2025, 9:31 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Konstanz

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Konstanz
PI Affiliation
Harvard Business School

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-04-15
End date
2025-08-01
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We have evidence from a prior field experiment and online study that shows that participants who are randomized into a more effortful sign-up process follow-through on a subsequent action more. However, while we suggest possible psychological mechanisms that could be underlying this effect, we do not have evidence regarding what these mechanisms are.

The purpose of this online experimental study is to test one of these mechanisms: whether participants' perceived value of the action varies by treatment group. As in the previous online study, we invite people to an online study to conduct digitization tasks. After finishing these tasks, they are offered the chance to return the following day to complete the same tasks, with participants being randomized into two main treatment groups: the less effort group, where participants can simply indicate they want to sign up for tomorrow's task; and the more effort group, where participants have to complete an additional survey to sign up. After this, participants who signed up are asked how much of an additional bonus they would be willing to accept (WTA) in order to forego the following day's return opportunity using a BDM elicitation. Our hypothesis is that participants who were randomized to the more effortful sign-up process, and who sign up for the following day's opportunity, will have a higher WTA than those in the less effortful group. This would suggest that participants place higher value on the opportunity to return in the more effortful group.

Registration Citation

Citation
Dykstra, Holly, Holly Dykstra and Ashley Whillans. 2025. "The Buy-In Effect: When Increasing Initial Effort Motivates Behavioral Follow-Through - Willingness to Pay - Online Study." AEA RCT Registry. April 22. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15585-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
In Part 1, study participants will complete three digitization tasks. At the end of the digitization tasks, they are informed that they can sign up for the opportunity to return tomorrow to complete the same tasks (Part 2). Participants are randomized into two main treatments:

1. Less effort - these participants simply indicate yes or no whether they want to sign up for tomorrow.
2. More effort - these participants must fill out a 15-question survey if they want to sign up for tomorrow.

For participants who decide to sign up, after they complete their sign-up, they are asked how much of a bonus (up to $3.50, the maximum they could earn in the return opportunity) they would be willing to accept (WTA) now in order to forego the following day's return opportunity. This is based on the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak (BDM) method (Becker, DeGroot, & Marschak, 1964). Participants are informed that if the bonus amount they enter is lower than the computer-generated random amount, they will receive the bonus; if the amount they enter is higher than the random amount, they will receive the return opportunity. Incorporating this measure allows us to determine the WTA of participants, i.e., the value they place on the return opportunity, and whether or not the value differs depending on their assignment to the Less Effort vs. More Effort group. On the page after the BDM elicitation, participants are informed of the computer-generated random amount, whether their entered WTA was lower or higher than this, and therefore, whether they will receive the return opportunity. Participants who receive the return opportunity are then invited back to complete Part 2 the next day.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2025-04-15
Intervention End Date
2025-04-18

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Willingness-to-accept price
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We will compare the average WTA price between the More Effort treatment group and Less Effort treatment group.

We will remove people who take the study more than once and people who fail the attention check in our study, which involves correctly answering the following question (which randomly presents one of the three number options) :

"This question is presented randomly to determine if you are paying attention while completing the survey. Please select “[$10,000/$50,000/$90,000]” from the responses below to pass the attention check.

What is [10%/50%/90%] of $100,000?

$10,000
$25,000
$32,000
$44,000
$50,000
$90,000
$100,0000"

We will also control for participants who report a WTA of $0 and for the degree of effort in the main task (number of letters entered and percent correct).

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We will invite study participants on Amazon Mechanical Turk.

PART 1:
Part 1 of the study consists of 4 parts, described below.

(1) Task instructions and understanding questions:
Participants will be presented with the task instructions. The task asks participants to digitize sets of 35 “fuzzy greek letters" (as used in Augenblick, Niederle, & Sprenger, 2015; Augenblick & Rabin, 2019). Three out of a total of fifty sets of fuzzy greek letters will be randomly presented to each participant. of In order to correctly digitize a fuzzy greek letter, participants must click on the correct corresponding greek letter in the survey. Participants are told that they do not need to complete each set, but that in order to get a bonus payment, they must get 80%, or at least 28 of the 35 letters, correct. After instructions, participants are required to complete three understanding questions before they proceed to the main task. They can repeat these until they get them right.

(2) Main task:
Participants are then presented with three digitization task (where they must click next after completing task 1 to be presented with task 2, then task 3).

(3) Sign-up for return opportunity:
Participants are asked if they would like to sign up for a return opportunity tomorrow, which they are told will involve the same digitization tasks and will be available from 9am-5pm Eastern Time tomorrow. They are also told that regardless of their choice, they have already earned their guaranteed payment and bonus payment for today. The rest of the instructions differ slightly depending on which treatment groups they are in:

MAIN TREATMENTS:
- Less Effort: "If you would like to receive access to tomorrow's return opportunity, please click yes. Otherwise, click no."
- More Effort: "If you would like to receive access to tomorrow's return opportunity, please click yes. This will take you to an additional 15-question survey on the next page. Otherwise, click no." The survey consists of 15 questions. On the survey page, participants can review the questions and change their mind (i.e., decide not to complete the questions, and not sign up for the return opportunity).

(4) Willingness-to-accept: After completing sign-up, participants are asked how much of a bonus payment they are willing to accept in order to forego the following day's return opportunity. They will be asked to enter a payment amount up to $3.50, and are informed that if the amount they enter is lower than the computer-generated random amount on the following page, they will receive the payment amount they entered, and if it is higher than the computer-generated random amount, they will receive the return opportunity instead. On the following page, they are informed of the computer-generated random amount, whether their number is higher lower, and therefore whether they will receive the additional bonus or the return opportunity.

They are then brought to the end of the survey.

PART 2:
As explained to study participants, Part 2 is available on the Amazon Mechanical Turk Platform from 9am to 5pm Eastern Time. It consists of two sections:

1. Instructions: Participants will be presented with the task instructions. The task instructions are the same as in Part 1.
2. Main task: Participants will then be presented with the digitization tasks. The tasks are the same as in Part 1.

Exclusions:
- We will exclude any duplicate responses (i.e., participants who take Part 1 more than once)
- We will exclude anyone who does not pass the attention check
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization conducted automatically in Qualtrics, with equal amounts of participants assigned to each group
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
0
Sample size: planned number of observations
325 participants to Part 1 or until one week has passed. The study will only be active on weekdays, so that Part 1 will only be conducted Monday-Thursday, and Part 2 will only be conducted Tuesday-Friday.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Less effort - 162
More effort - 163
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
We require a sample size of 260 to be sufficiently powered for a MDE of 26 cents at a 5% significance level, based on a baseline mean of $1.50 and a SD of 1.4.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Harvard University-Area Committee on the Use of Human Subjects
IRB Approval Date
2025-03-03
IRB Approval Number
IRB00000109

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials