Group Therapy and Mental Health: Evidence from India

Last registered on April 23, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Group Therapy and Mental Health: Evidence from India
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015641
Initial registration date
March 25, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 26, 2025, 10:00 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
April 23, 2025, 10:17 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Southern California

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-11-13
End date
2025-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We study the impact of a short course of transdiagnostic group therapy on the psychological wellbeing of low-income women with psychological distress in India.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Angelucci, Manuela and Daniel Bennett. 2025. "Group Therapy and Mental Health: Evidence from India." AEA RCT Registry. April 23. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15641-3.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2024-12-02
Intervention End Date
2025-07-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Mental health and wellbeing (PHQ-9, GAD-7, PSS, WHO-5)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We will look at pooled effects, effects by group size (small vs large) and effects by baseline depression (depressed vs not depressed).

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Investment and its pathways (productivity, cost of effort, willingness to be paid, cost of action & indecisiveness, cognition, risk preferences, and time preferences). As exploratory outcomes, we want to explore the impacts on mental illness stigma/belief, mental illness knowledge, autonomy, and violence.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We will implement a pilot RCT to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of SH+, a transdiagnostic short course of group therapy for people with psychological distress, in our context. We will screen adult women for psychological distress using the PHQ-4 scale.

We will implement a RCT to obtain evidence about the effectiveness of this intervention in terms of improving mental health.

We will identify 40 locality clusters within a peri-urban area near Bangalore, Karnataka. We will randomize these clusters into three arms based on treatment status and the targeted size of the SH+ groups.

Within the forty clusters, we will randomize 10 to be “large” treatment clusters, 15 to be “small” treatment clusters, and 15 to be small control clusters. To improve power and simplify recruitment, this trial will only include women. Within the large clusters, we will seek to recruit 45 participants by screening 300 women. Within the small clusters, we will seek to recruit 20 participants by screening 135 women. We assume that 67 percent of participants will join the SH+ groups, so that the large clusters will have around 30 people per group and the small clusters will have around 13 people per group. Under this approach, we will screen 7000 women to obtain a sample of 1050 study participants. Using an “intent to treat” approach, we will measure effects among all individuals who we recruit, regardless of whether they actively participate.
The comparison of the small treatment and control clusters allows us to assess whether the intervention is effective relative to a pure control group. The comparison of the large treatment clusters and the small treatment clusters allows us to measure the differential impact for larger clusters, which is a key piece of evidence that informs the scalability and cost effectiveness of this intervention.

To assess final outcomes, we will carry out a baseline and two follow-up surveys. The baseline survey will occur at the time of recruitment. It will collect key demographic variables and mental health outcomes that will serve as the primary outcomes for our analysis. The first follow-up survey will occur after the conclusion of the five-week SH+ course. This survey will measure the baseline outcomes again, as well as relevant behavioral and socioeconomic outcomes.

The second follow-up survey is intended to give preliminary evidence regarding the effectiveness of SH+ over a longer time frame. A few months after the baseline survey, we will offer an SH+ booster session in the small treatment clusters. Afterward, we will implement the second follow-up in these clusters. This approach will provide an indication about whether effects diminish over time and whether a booster session increases the longevity of the intervention impacts.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
Locality clusters
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
40
Sample size: planned number of observations
1050
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
control=15 clusters (300 participants)
large cluster=10 clusters (450 participants)
small cluster=15 clusters (300 participants)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
DAI Research and Advisory Services
IRB Approval Date
2024-10-23
IRB Approval Number
IRB00012768