Violence Against Women: Exploring the Mechanisms Underlying Reporting Behavior

Last registered on April 15, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Violence Against Women: Exploring the Mechanisms Underlying Reporting Behavior
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015753
Initial registration date
April 07, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 15, 2025, 2:20 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Universidad Publica de Navarra

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Universidad Publica de Navarra
PI Affiliation
Universidad Publica de Navarra
PI Affiliation
Universidad de Oviedo

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-04-09
End date
2025-05-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
In a previous study (AEARCTR-0011814), we analyzed the importance of three factors in the reporting behavior of witnesses of violence against women: whether witnesses are required to identify and report the aggressor, whether they must disclose their own identity, and whether they have to report to the police. We found that reporting increased when the aggressor remained anonymous and when the police was the reporting institution. In this study, we aim to explore the mechanisms underlying these results, focusing on the role of fear as an emotion that may explain the effect of aggressor anonymity and the involvement of the police as the reporting institution.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Echavarri, Rebeca et al. 2025. "Violence Against Women: Exploring the Mechanisms Underlying Reporting Behavior." AEA RCT Registry. April 15. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15753-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2025-04-09
Intervention End Date
2025-05-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Willingness to intervene under different reporting options and fear induction treatment
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Participants will read a realistic and clearly explained hypothetical scenario (a vignette) and, based on this context, will decide whether to intervene or not. They will be randomly assigned to one of four choice conditions.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Individual.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
200 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
200 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
200 individuals, 50 per treatment.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Ethics Committee of the Universidad Publica de Navarra
IRB Approval Date
2022-06-29
IRB Approval Number
N/A