The Economics of Choosing Traditional Medicine in India: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Last registered on May 21, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The Economics of Choosing Traditional Medicine in India: Evidence from a Field Experiment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015971
Initial registration date
May 07, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
May 21, 2025, 11:48 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-06-01
End date
2025-08-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
In low- and middle-income countries, traditional medicine is widely used despite limited evidence of its effectiveness compared to modern medicine. This study investigates the economic and political determinants of traditional medicine usage in India through a field experiment in Delhi. A randomized intervention tests two treatments: (1) providing scientific information on modern medicine and (2) offering cost coverage and financial incentives to adopt modern medicine. Preliminary results suggest that cost coverage and incentives significantly increase modern medicine take-up, with persistent effects on health outcomes and beliefs. A patient demand model evaluates cost-effective policy interventions to integrate traditional and modern medical systems. These findings offer insights for improving healthcare efficiency in developing countries.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Wei, Zincy. 2025. "The Economics of Choosing Traditional Medicine in India: Evidence from a Field Experiment." AEA RCT Registry. May 21. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15971-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2025-06-10
Intervention End Date
2025-07-10

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Uptake of Modern Medicine: Primary outcome. This can be measured as the proportion of participants in each group who report that they obtained and started taking an antihypertensive medication by midline or endline. At endline, we will specifically look at how many are currently using modern medicine (regardless of whether they also still use traditional remedies). Uptake can be further broken down into categories:
Full Switch: Using modern medicine and completely stopped traditional remedy.
Complementary Use: Using modern medicine in addition to traditional methods (dual use).
No Uptake: Still solely relying on traditional medicine.

Blood Pressure Change: Primary clinical outcome. Change in systolic and diastolic BP from baseline to endline for each participant. We will compare average BP reduction across the three groups. We hypothesize that both intervention groups will have greater BP reductions than control, due to more people taking effective medication. The cost arm might show the largest drop if it achieves the highest adherence, but the messaging arm could also show significant improvements if it convinced many to take the medication. Even a partial uptake (some days on meds) might yield some BP improvement. We’ll also track the proportion of patients achieving BP control (e.g. <140/90 mmHg) at endline in each group.

Continued Traditional Medicine Use: This is more of a process measure to see how people adjust their regimen. We will ask at midline and endline if they are still using their herbal or traditional treatments. This helps identify if modern meds are seen as a substitute (replacing the traditional) or as a complement. If the messaging works as intended, we might see high combined use in that arm, whereas in the cost arm, some might completely switch (or some might also combine; it’s an empirical question). We will also note if any participant in control spontaneously combined (some might have decided to try both on their own).
Beliefs and Attitudes: Although not the primary outcome, we will measure changes in key beliefs from baseline to endline:
Perceived efficacy of modern medicine for BP (e.g. "Do you think modern medicine can effectively control your BP?" – Likert scale).
Perceived efficacy/safety of traditional medicine for BP.

Trust in healthcare providers (traditional and modern).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Control Group: Receives only a baseline health screening and an information session on hypertension and treatment options. No further intervention is provided. This group serves as the benchmark to measure the effect of additional support.

Free Medication Group (Cost Coverage): In addition to the baseline session, participants receive free access to a recommended modern antihypertensive drug, either through direct provision or vouchers redeemable at local clinics. This arm isolates the effect of removing financial barriers to modern treatment.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Survey CTO randomization
Randomization Unit
Individual level
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Participants were individually randomized into one of three groups using simple random assignment. Treatment was not clustered, and assignment was independent across individuals.
Sample size: planned number of observations
1800 patients with hypertension and mainly use traditional medicine for treatment
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
900
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
NU Institutional Review Boards Office
IRB Approval Date
2025-03-24
IRB Approval Number
STU00223433
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials