Back to History Current Version

The Hong Kong Jockey Club Financial Education Programme

Last registered on June 18, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The Hong Kong Jockey Club Financial Education Programme
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016015
Initial registration date
May 14, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
May 21, 2025, 2:24 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
June 18, 2025, 4:42 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
The Education University of Hong Kong

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-02-02
End date
2027-10-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Financial literacy or competency refers to the ability to understand and apply financial knowledge, skills, and attitudes to make informed decisions and promote personal financial well-being. Despite growing global interest in financial education, empirical studies focusing on upper primary students remain limited. Moreover, recent studies have shown that Hong Kong youths’ financial literacy levels are unsatisfactory and financial education in local schools remains fragmented and insufficiently integrated into the formal curriculum. To address these gaps, the present study aims to develop upper primary students’ financial capabilities by providing three types of financial education curriculum models for Hong Kong upper primary students.

A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted with Hong Kong students in Primary 4 to 6. Participants in the intervention groups received structured financial education programs delivered in comprehensive or condensed version over one or three year(s). Schools were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (a) T1 – a three-year comprehensive version of the curriculum; (b) T2 – a one-year condensed version of the curriculum T1; (c) T3 – an alternative one-year condensed curriculum developed currently existing in the market; and (d) Control group – no treatment or intervention. Main outcomes are increases in students’ financial competence, attitudes, behaviors, and economic preferences.

In addition to evaluating the impact of the different curriculum models, the study also plans to examine the heterogeneity of treatment effects by students’ socioeconomic backgrounds.

This study is expected to contribute to the existing literature on financial literacy education, particularly for the underexplored upper primary age group. The findings are also expected to offer practical insights for future policy development and curriculum implementation in Hong Kong.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Yu, Wai Mui Christina . 2025. "The Hong Kong Jockey Club Financial Education Programme." AEA RCT Registry. June 18. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16015-1.1
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
As outlined in the abstract, this study includes three different financial education programmes: T1, T2, and T3. Programmes T1 and T2 are primarily developed by organization A. The primary difference between them is that T1 is a comprehensive three-year curriculum, while T2 is a condensed one-year version of the same curriculum content. The third programme, T3, is a one-year curriculum designed by organization B in Hong Kong. Although the content and duration vary across the three programmes, all treatments share the common goal of enhancing financial literacy or competency among Hong Kong students in Primary 4 to 6. All programmes are delivered within the school setting to ensure consistency in implementation and context.
Intervention Start Date
2024-09-01
Intervention End Date
2027-06-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Financial competency (e.g., financial knowledge and skills, financial attitudes and motivation, financial behaviors), economic preferences (e.g. risk- and time preferences)]
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) design was planned to examine the impact of different programmes (or treatments) on the financial competency of upper primary students in Hong Kong. Specifically, a school-level cluster RCT was employed, with all registered schools randomly assigned to the respective experimental conditions described above. All participants will be invited to complete pre- and post-tests aligned with the intervention timeline. In addition, classroom observations and semi-structured interviews are planned to supplement the quantitative data, enabling insights into the possible causal mechanisms behind the treatment effects.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization via the statistical software, Stata
Randomization Unit
School
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
around 52 schools (estimated coverage; actual number of analysable observations may vary due to implementation realities)
Sample size: planned number of observations
around 8,000 students (estimated coverage; actual number of analysable observations may vary due to implementation realities)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
4 pure control schools, 12 delayed start schools, 12 schools assigned to T1, 12 schools assigned to T2, 12 schools assigned to T3. (estimated coverage; actual number of analysable observations may vary due to implementation realities)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Human Research Ethics Committee, the Education University of Hong Kong
IRB Approval Date
2024-02-02
IRB Approval Number
2023-2024-0275