Fostering Human Capital and Youth Empowerment in Northwest Nigeria through Edutainment, EdTech and Digital Workshops

Last registered on June 23, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Fostering Human Capital and Youth Empowerment in Northwest Nigeria through Edutainment, EdTech and Digital Workshops
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016233
Initial registration date
June 18, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 23, 2025, 11:51 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
CIDE & Middlesex University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
The World Bank

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-06-20
End date
2027-06-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Female adolescents in Northwest Nigeria face significant barriers due to gender inequities that limit their educational progression. In the region, primary net attendance rates are approximately 47 percent for girls, and 44% of Nigerian girls marry before age 18. Secondary attendance is even lower, with rural areas particularly affected. In settings with gender-biased social norms, factors such as low parental aspirations, illiteracy, and language barriers further constrain girls' schooling, leading to poor long-term outcomes. While girls are a key target group affected by educational marginalization in Northern Nigeria, the challenge extends across both genders, with net attendance rates reaching only 53 percent. Getting out-of-school children back into education poses a massive challenge. Even when children are enrolled, they often face learning poverty, defined as children's inability to read and understand a simple text by age 10.

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of edutainment interventions designed to address learning poverty, youth empowerment and gender inequity among youth aged 10-15 in the states of Kano, Jigawa, and Sokoto states. Building on evidence from the cost-effective "Movies and Mobiles" trial (see http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4221220), which demonstrated success in improving learning outcomes for younger children (ages 6-9 and their siblings 6-12), this new study focuses on adolescents (10-15 years old). We use a cluster RCT design across 88 school catchment areas, where 44 treatment areas will receive community screenings of aspirational videos aimed at reshaping parental and adolescent attitudes toward education and gender equality, combined with smartphones preloaded with literacy and numeracy applications for youth. A subset of 22 treatment areas will additionally receive intensive learning workshops for both adolescents and their parents to assess whether this reinforcement component can further enhance outcomes and increase intra-household and neighbour spillovers.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Orozco, Victor and Ericka Gabriela Rascon Ramirez. 2025. "Fostering Human Capital and Youth Empowerment in Northwest Nigeria through Edutainment, EdTech and Digital Workshops." AEA RCT Registry. June 23. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16233-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

Partner

Type
private_company

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
This study will evaluate the causal impact of combining aspirational video screenings and EdTech tools (T1) and an add-on intervention consisting of digital skill workshops (T1+T2) to improve learning outcomes, agency and shift harmful social norms among adolescents aged 10–15 in northern Nigeria (Kano, Jigawa and Sokoto). In the 44 communities receiving the treatment, 40% of treated participants will receive a mobile phone with m-learning apps.

All participants allocated to T1 will be invited to aspirational video screenings, and 40% of these participants will receive a mobile phone with m-learning apps. T2 consists of all T1 components plus digital learning workshops aimed at promoting reading habits through the m-learning apps. The control group will not receive any intervention.

This study will not assess the separate impact of aspirational video screenings and EdTech as this was done in a previous trial led by the PI. See details here http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4221220.
Intervention Start Date
2025-07-26
Intervention End Date
2025-10-12

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Adolescents (10-15 years old)

Overall literacy and numeracy skills, early marriage and parenthood among female adolescents, and selected psychological and attitudinal measures such adolescents’ aspirations about early marriage and self-efficacy beliefs about improving literacy skills.



Parents of Adolescents

Parental attitude towards school and early marriage.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Literacy and numeracy skills



Literacy outcomes will be constructed as an aggregated measure of the following EGRA components: letter recognition, passage reading, reading comprehension, listening comprehension, and letter and word dictation. In addition to the aggregated measure, we will also examine an indicator of foundational skills, measured as the proportion of adolescents with zero correct answers in letter recognition.

Numeracy outcomes will be constructed as an aggregated measure of the following EGMA components: number recognition, number discrimination, missing number identification, addition, and subtraction.

Early marriage and Early Parenthood

Early marriage will be measured as the proportion of female adolescents married by age 18.

Early parenthood will be measured as the proportion of mothers by age 18.



Adolescent aspirations



These will be measure using questions such as: Would you like to get married in the future?, Ideally, at what age would you like to get married? Ideally, at what age would you like to have your first child? , Which of these drawings reflects what you aspire to do most of your time when you turn 15 (options: Attending school to study how to read/write and numeracy, working outside home (e.g., working in the local market or the business of a family or relative), being married and taking care of your own home, helping your family with domestic chores, attending school to study religious education, other (open question)).



Adolescent Self-efficacy beliefs about their own learning



Independently of your education, your parents’ education, your literacy level and main language spoken at home, how capable do you feel about: learning or improving your reading and writing skills in Hausa?, learning or improving your numeracy skills (e.g., sums, subtractions)?, improving your communication skills by using games at home such as telling a story to your parents or siblings, reading to them or singing with them? improving your learning in literacy and numeracy by setting a specific time and place for studying at home? Each of these is a separate question.



Self-Efficacy beliefs about their sibling’s learning



Independently of your education, your parents’ education, your literacy level and main language spoken at home, how capable do you feel about helping your siblings to (each of this is a separate question): learn or improve their reading and writing skills in Hausa?, to learn/improve their numeracy skills (e.g., sums, subtractions)?, to improve their communication skills by using games at home such as asking your siblings to tell you a story, ask them to read to you, or sing with you?, to improve their learning in literacy and numeracy by setting a specific time and place for studying at home?.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Based on the theory of change, we also expect changes in the proportion of out-of-school children, retention rates from primary to secondary school, adolescent aspirations for further schooling, parental aspirations for their children's schooling and marriage, and parental self-efficacy beliefs about supporting their children's learning at home. Currently, our study is not powered to detect these outcomes at the standard 80% statistical power threshold. However, if the interventions prove more impactful than our assumed minimum detectable effect (MDE), statistical power for these outcomes will likely exceed 80%. We therefore classify these as secondary outcomes.



We will also analyse possible mechanisms such as expectations, perception of gender roles and gender attitudes, and preferences for attending school in the future, getting married, helping with domestic chores, among others. We will also explore changes in mental health and socioemotional skills (e.g., grit, agency, self-esteem).
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
These interventions will be evaluated through a cluster randomized control trial. In total, 44 communities will be assigned to T1—half of which will receive an add-on of digital learning workshops—and 44 assigned to the Control group.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
This is a cluster randomized controlled trial in which communities, defined as school catchment areas, will be randomly allocated to T1, T2, or control groups. Randomisation has been done in our office by a computer using Stata.
Randomization Unit
Our randomization unit is the community, defined as school catchment areas.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
We will have 88 communities, defined as school catchment areas.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Baseline and follow-up data collection will take place in all 88 communities. In each community, 60 adolescents will be interviewed (30 girls and 30 boys), along with one parent and one sibling, resulting in a total of 5,280 families. We will also interview 30 adolescent neighbours (15 girls and 15 boys) to measure spillovers on the primary outcomes outlined above, resulting in a total of 2,640 neighbours.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
44 treatment communities and 44 control communities. Out of the 44 treated communities, 22 will receive, additionally, digital learning workshops for 6 weeks.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
HML IRB Research and Ethics
IRB Approval Date
2025-06-18
IRB Approval Number
IRB #2940