Technical knowledge, Institutions and Watershed Management: A Randomized Field Experiment in Ethiopia

Last registered on June 27, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Technical knowledge, Institutions and Watershed Management: A Randomized Field Experiment in Ethiopia
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016262
Initial registration date
June 25, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 27, 2025, 8:46 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Copenhagen

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Copenhagen
PI Affiliation
University of Copenhagen

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2025-01-20
End date
2026-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study uses Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) to investigate the impact of technical training and institutional innovations on watershed management adoption and impacts among watershed user group members in Ethiopia. The RCT has four experimental arms: (i) technical training, (ii) leadership training, (iii) (joint) monitoring, and (iv) a control group.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Belay, Dagim , Gebreegziabher Fentahun Gugsa and Goytom Abraha Kahsay. 2025. "Technical knowledge, Institutions and Watershed Management: A Randomized Field Experiment in Ethiopia." AEA RCT Registry. June 27. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16262-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2025-06-24
Intervention End Date
2026-04-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Adoption of watershed management practices, watershed management outcomes, quality of group governance
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Welfare outcomes, technical knowledge on watershed management technologies, leader responsiveness, members' participation, awareness on watershed management and governance of their group
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Treatments: The RCT includes 4 experimental arms: (1) technical training treatment (2) leadership training treatment (3) joint monitoring treatment and (4) control group.
1. Technical Training Treatment: The technical training will be structured as follows. First, participants will be trained in the design, layout and preparation of eyebrow basins, with emphasis on slope suitability and water retention capacity. Second, the training will cover the layout and preparation of micro basin including contour alignment and spacing guidelines. Third, trench preparation techniques will be given, focusing on appropriate depth, width, and with necessary related experts’ orientation. Fourth, detailed instruction will be provided on plantation pit sizing and preparation. Finally, the training will address post plant management practices, such as watering schedules, weeding strategies, and gap filling, aimed at improving plant survival rates and overall site sustainability. Participants will get hands-on technical training on demonstration sites. The training is designed to reflect existing technical gaps and align with nationally recommended watershed management standards (Community Based Participatory Watershed Development Standards). Demonstrations and practical exercises will be conducted outdoors. These sessions will cover the step-by-step preparation of the three technologies eyebrow basins, micro-basins, and trenches and their post-plant management, demonstration (successful implementations). The finalized training will be given to the chairperson and three members of the soil and water conservation committee of watershed user groups (WUGs) in the designated treatment villages. Further, awareness regarding the importance of watershed management generally and its importance in relation to climate-related challenges will be included in the training. The training will be conducted at central Farmer Training Centres (FTCs) over a two-day period. The training approach will be participatory, preparing practical demonstration, involving group discussions, practical exercises around FTC, and presentations using the prepared modules and images.
2. Leadership Training Treatment: In this treatment, we will strengthen the capacity of WUG executive committee members by focusing on six core components essential to effective and sustainable governance: leadership, planning and goal setting, inspirational leadership, participatory decision making, accountability and transparency. The training will be delivered using participatory and interactive methods such as role-playing exercise, scenario-based activities, and group discussions facilitated by experts in governance and natural resource management. The training will take place over the period of two days and will be delivered to four key members of each WUG executive committee, namely the chairperson, vice-chairperson, secretary, and finance to ensure that core leadership positions are equipped with the necessary skills and tools.
3. Joint Monitoring Treatment (Joint Monitoring + Reward): In this treatment, we will motivate watershed user groups (WUGs) to actively implement their established goals by strengthening both their leadership, governance and implementation of sustainable biophysical watershed management practices. We will invite to a start-up meeting in which WUGs chairperson, and two active members will be introduced to the program. In addition to the three group representatives, we will invite the district NaRM experts to participate in the meeting. Group representatives will be informed to arrange a meeting, after returning to their group, and introduce the program to group members. A joint monitoring structure will be established, comprising two active WUG members and one district-level Natural Resource Management (NaRM) expert.
A detailed monitoring checklist will be developed to assess the performance of watershed user groups and their governance. This checklist will include performance measurement criteria covering both technical aspects, including the implementation and quality of watershed management practices, and governance aspects including leadership effectiveness, transparency, and accountability within the groups. The reward will be given by comparing biophysical watershed management accomplishment of the group at the endline against their respective baseline performance (achievements from previous years) allowing for a fair and evidence-based assessment of progress and effort.
Monitoring teams will use a checklist to carry out objective evaluations of watershed management activities and governance practices. These assessments will inform the selection of high performing watershed user groups, but the reward decision will be made by a separate zonal and district level rewards committee composed of senior NaRM officials and district level technical committee. This committee will review monitoring results to identify the top three performing WUGs based on transparent, predefined criteria reflecting implementations of biophysical watershed management accomplishment, membership participation and compare it with baseline performance. The reward includes material support and public recognition (e.g., certificates).
4. Control group (business-as-usual): The control group will continue with the current practices of watershed management without exposure to any additional treatments.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization is done at office by a computer
Randomization Unit
The randomization unit is Watershed User Groups (WUGs)
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
200 WUGs
Sample size: planned number of observations
2000 households
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
50 WUGs (500 households) per experimental arm
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of science, University of Copenhagen
IRB Approval Date
2024-06-26
IRB Approval Number
504-0518/24-5000