Back to History Current Version

Media coverage of domestic violence: prolific online survey

Last registered on June 27, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Media coverage of domestic violence: prolific online survey
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016296
Initial registration date
June 27, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 27, 2025, 9:19 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Turin

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Warwick

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-06-30
End date
2025-10-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We are conducting an online survey experiment that complements analyses of media coverage of domestic violence. The main goal of the survey experiment is to evaluate the effect of providing information about the prevalence of domestic violence on how people perceive and react to cases of domestic violence.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Belguise, Margot and Iacopo Monterosa. 2025. "Media coverage of domestic violence: prolific online survey." AEA RCT Registry. June 27. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16296-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention (Hidden)
We will recruit French-based participants based on Prolific.

Participants will be randomly assigned to a short message, in the form of an infographic, which provides figures on the prevalence of different types of domestic violence in France (treatment message) or figures on an unrelated topic, road safety in France (control message).

All participants will then be exposed to vignettes on different types of abuse in a relationship. We will then evaluate the respondents’ assessments of these situations.
Intervention Start Date
2025-06-30
Intervention End Date
2025-10-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
We are interested in the following outcomes:

1) Respondents’ assessments of severity of the situation in the vignette,
2) Allocation of responsibility within the couple for the conflict presented in the vignette,
3) Willingness to seek help or contact authorities when faced with situations like in the vignette.
4) Willingness to support anti-violence organizations.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
1) Severity. How would you rate the severity of this case?

Options: [On a scale from 1 to 5; 1 (Not severe at all) – 5 (Extremely severe)]


2) Responsibility. This question is directly related to the character' names in the vignette. It is slightly rephrased here to make it more understandable.

In a situation where two people in a couple have a serious conflict, who do you think is more at fault?

Options:
• Entirely Person A's fault
• Mostly Person A's fault
• Both are equally responsible
• Mostly Person B's fault
• Entirely Person B's fault

3) Help-seeking.

If you were aware of this situation, what would you do? You can select multiple options

Options:
I would confront the man
I would confront the woman
I would try to mediate between the couple
I would draw the attention of other people who could help
I would talk to the police
I would do nothing

Some people say going to the police won’t be helpful. Others say it’s important to report what happened.

If you were faced with this situation, how likely would you be to contact the police?
Options [On a scale from 1 to 5; 1 (Very unlikely) – 5 (Very likely)]

4) Support anti-violence organizations.

One participant will be randomly selected to receive an additional €30. You may choose to donate some or all of this amount to an organization fighting against violence against women. If you are selected, we will donate according to your instructions. The rest will be paid to you directly if you are selected.

How much would you like to donate?

Options (Insert amount from 0 to 30. The rest will be paid to you directly if you are selected.)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
We will also collect sociodemographic data on respondents (gender, education, employment, cohabitation with partner, political orientation, beliefs in gender norms), and information on prior knowledge of prevalence of domestic violence in France or knowledge of the control group message. We will explore if responses change by sociodemographic characteristics or prior knowledge.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Participants will be randomized into either a treatment group or a control group.
Experimental Design Details
Participants will be randomized into a treatment arm or a control group.

Treatment message, displayed as infographic:

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN FRANCE

In 2023, more than one woman per day in France was either killed or survived an attempted murder by her partner or ex-partner
1 woman/day

In 2023, 271,000 victims of domestic violence were recorded by French law-enforcement authorities – a 10% increase compared with the previous year

64% Physical violence
32% Verbal or psychological violence
4% Sexual violence

Reports have doubled since 2016, driven by heightened public awareness and improved police action.


Control message, displayed as infographic:

ROAD SAFETY IN FRANCE

In 2023, 3,431 people were killed on French roads — an increase compared with 2022. Another 233,000 people were injured.

3,431

Most road deaths were car occupants (45%)
Pedestrian deaths are rising again (451 deaths, +3% vs 2023)
Cyclist deaths remain high (7%)


We will then present all respondents with three different scenarios (vignettes), portraying various types of domestic violence, focusing on psychological and physical aggression. For each of these scenarios, we will evaluate the respondents’ assessments of severity, allocation of responsibility within the couple for the conflict, and willingness to seek help or contact authorities when faced with such situations.

We report below the three vignettes:

Vignette 1
Sophie and Marc have been married for five years. One evening, Sophie says she’s too tired to go to dinner at Marc’s parents.
Marc gets angry: he yells, accuses her of not caring about his family, throws a cushion at her, slams the bedroom door, and isolates himself for hours. He’s behaved this way many times before. Since the beginning, Sophie has known Marc is temperamental.

Vignette 2
Chloé and Adrien have been together for four years.
Adrien, who admits to being jealous, gets upset when Chloé says she’s going to dinner with colleagues.
Adrian complains that she didn’t mention it before. He wants to spend that evening with her and accuses “acting single”.
As Chloé walks toward the door, Adrien stands in front of it. He doesn't touch her, but his posture is rigid, and his tone threatening. He then steps aside, and she decides to stay home that night. Lately, this has occurred frequently.

Vignette 3
Camille and Luc dated for over a year, but then Camille ended the relationship. After a long silence, Luc messaged her, saying he missed her and had changed. She replied briefly, but then she made it clear she wasn’t interested. She had moved on and was seeing someone new
He threatened to share private photos from their past. Laura stopped replying, but the messages kept coming. Luc says she needs to understand he’s still hurt.



Randomization Method
The randomization will be done on Prolific, a website for conducting online surveys.
Randomization Unit
The unit of randomization will be the individual subject.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
For this intervention, we plan to collect roughly 100 observations.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
We plan to collect roughly 50 observations per treatment arm.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
ETHICS COMMITTEE of Collegio Carlo Alberto
IRB Approval Date
2025-06-26
IRB Approval Number
5/2025

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials