Removing Barriers to Integration: Experimental Evidence on Cash and Information Support for Asylum Seekers

Last registered on July 17, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Removing Barriers to Integration: Experimental Evidence on Cash and Information Support for Asylum Seekers
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016384
Initial registration date
July 14, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 17, 2025, 8:06 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
July 17, 2025, 10:04 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
ITAM

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Georgetown University
PI Affiliation
ITAM
PI Affiliation
UNHCR and Universidad de Costa Rica
PI Affiliation
University of California, San Diego

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-09-02
End date
2027-05-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We study the impact of temporary unconditional cash transfers and information interventions on asylum seekers' integration into state social programs and public services, as well as broader socioeconomic and psychological integration in Costa Rica. In partnership with UNHCR, we conduct a randomized controlled trial with 2,587 participants cross-randomized to receive cash transfers, information about government social programs and public services, both interventions, or neither. We measure outcomes including take-up of state programs and services, knowledge of such programs and services, psychological well-being, barriers to accessing government assistance and services, and medium-term socioeconomic integration. Data collection combines telephone surveys with administrative records from Costa Rica's unified social information system. This study tests whether temporarily removing financial constraints and informational barriers can enable asylum seekers to transition from humanitarian assistance to state-sponsored social protection while improving their overall economic and psychological outcomes, informing policies for sustainable refugee integration as humanitarian funding becomes increasingly constrained.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Bandiera, Antonella et al. 2025. "Removing Barriers to Integration: Experimental Evidence on Cash and Information Support for Asylum Seekers." AEA RCT Registry. July 17. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16384-1.1
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
This study evaluates two interventions delivered to asylum seekers in Costa Rica through UNHCR:

1. Unconditional Cash Transfers (UCT): Participants receive USD $880 total, distributed over either 3 months (higher monthly amounts) or 6 months (lower monthly amounts). The cash transfers are designed to alleviate immediate financial constraints and enable recipients to meet basic needs.

2. Information Campaign: Participants receive 10 informational flyers via WhatsApp about Costa Rican government social programs and public services available to asylum seekers and refugees. The materials cover: financial assistance programs (IMAS), educational degree validation, professional training courses (INA), medical care and health insurance, identification document renewal, and domestic violence support services. The information includes eligibility requirements and application procedures.

Study Design: The study uses a 2x3 factorial design with 6 treatment arms: (1) control group receiving neither intervention, (2) information only, (3) 3-month UCT only, (4) 6-month UCT only, (5) 3-month UCT plus information, and (6) 6-month UCT plus information. The interventions test whether temporarily removing financial constraints and informational barriers can help asylum seekers transition from humanitarian assistance to state-sponsored social protection while improving overall socioeconomic integration.
Intervention Start Date
2024-09-02
Intervention End Date
2026-04-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
This study has two types of outcomes: survey outcomes and outcomes from administrative data.
Survey Outcomes:
1. Treatment-Implementation Outcomes
- Cash transfer received, amount, frequency
- Flyers received, number of flyers

2. Psychological Well-being
- Self-reported depression (PHQ-2 index)
- Perceived stress (PSS-4 index)

3. Social Integration
- Social integration index
- Self-reported connection to Costa Rica
- Discriminatory treatment experiences
- Intent to relocate

4. Navigational Integration: Knowledge
- Acquired knowledge index (knowledge of social programs)

5. Navigational Integration: Attitudes
- Trust in Costa Rican government index
- Self-reported navigational integration index
- Trust in UNHCR

6. Institutional Engagement and Access
- Participation in social programs index
- Applications to social programs index
- Integration in public services index
- Direct constraints to accessing social programs index
- Indirect constraints to accessing social programs index
- Dealing with constraints index

7. Economic Integration
- Economic integration index
- Short-term and long-term basic needs indices
- Economic activity index
- Financial inclusion

8. Perceived State Discrimination
- Self-reported discrimination in state interactions index

Administrative Outcomes:

Institutional engagement and access (social program participation, health insurance, education enrollment)
Economic integration (employment outcomes, formal income)

Please refer to the attached analysis plan for further details on outcomes, measurement, and survey instrument.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Please refer to the study analysis plan for detailed measurement specifications and survey question mappings.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This is a randomized controlled trial using a 2x3 factorial design with block randomization. The study has 2,587 participants recruited monthly over seven months (September 2024 to February 2025) from asylum applicants registering with UNHCR offices in Costa Rica.

Randomization: Participants are block-randomized monthly using a stratified approach. Each month, eligible participants are first stratified into three groups based on baseline knowledge and prior use of Costa Rica's government social programs (prior knowledge and use, prior knowledge but no use, no knowledge and no use). Within each stratum, participants are blocked on UNHCR's vulnerability score and into blocks of approximately 16 individuals with the most similar scores. Within each block, participants are randomly assigned to one of six treatment arms.

Treatment Arms:
Control (25%): Neither cash nor information
Information only (25%): Social program information via WhatsApp
3-month UCT only (12.5%): Cash transfers for 3 months
6-month UCT only (12.5%): Cash transfers for 6 months
3-month UCT + Information (12.5%): Cash transfers for 3 months + Social program information via WhatsApp
6-month UCT + Information (12.5%): Cash transfers for 6 months + Social program information via WhatsApp

Data Collection: The study combines telephone surveys (midline 6 months after first delivery of treatment, endline at 12 months post-treatment) with administrative data from Costa Rica's unified social information system (SINIRUBE), Social Security Fund (CCSS), and Ministry of Education.

Sample: Excludes individuals flagged as extremely vulnerable by UNHCR (who receive UCT with certainty). The final sample is 2,587 participants (reduced from planned 3,600 due to budget constraints). See analysis plan and below for implications of sample size reduction.

Please refer to analysis plan for further details.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization was done using a computer.
Randomization Unit
Individuals
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
2587
Sample size: planned number of observations
2587
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Control: 649
Information only: 661
3-month UCT only: 319
6-month UCT only: 321
3-month UCT + Information: 322
6-month UCT + Information: 315
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
This study is powered to detect effects on economic outcomes that are in line with those reported in previous studies of cash transfers and refugees. In particular, the study is well-powered to detect effect sizes around 0.11 standard deviations for the main pooled comparisons (e.g., UCT vs no UCT). Please see the attached analysis plan for more details on minimum detectable effects (MDEs) for all comparisons under different scenarios of attrition (for survey outcomes) and changes in effect sizes following budget cuts that left us with a final sample of 2,587.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México IRB
IRB Approval Date
2025-07-14
IRB Approval Number
NA
IRB Name
University of California, San Diego IRB
IRB Approval Date
2024-09-18
IRB Approval Number
# 811068
IRB Name
Georgetown University IRB
IRB Approval Date
2025-07-12
IRB Approval Number
STUDY00009519