Abstract
The rapid development of AI has greatly affected the workplace, with even greater potential to be unleashed in the short future. While in simple tasks AI may completely replace humans, in more complicated tasks the approach is more likely to be "AI + Humans", where humans oversee the actions of AI and humans make the final decisions. This approach is based on the assumption that such "AI + Humans" approach can out-perform Humans alone or AI alone. We examine the performance of "AI + Humans" for the credit screening task in the commercial banking sector using randomized controlled trials.
We will first develop an AI assistant by training the popular general AI models using the bank historical lending data. We will then ramdonly open this AI assistant to human loan officers so that these human loan officers can seek advice from the AI assistant. We then examine how this AI-assisted humans perform relative to the AI assistant alone or other human loan officers alone. In particular, in scenarios where AI make more (less) accurate credit risk assessment, whether and when humans follow (ignore) AI's advices? What are the policy implications that can lead to better human uses of AI assistant?