Abstract
This study examines whether artificial intelligence (AI) tools enhance or substitute for student learning in higher education. We pilot a randomized experiment with around 240 first-year students across 6 classes in the compulsory university-wide Economics and Society course, comparing an AI-enhanced treatment group receiving structured AI tool access and guidance with a control group following traditional instruction. The treatment incorporates AI tools in 6 out of 10 sessions, focusing on complementary rather than substitutable use. Outcomes include test scores, attitudes towards AI, and study habits. The study addresses critical gaps in understanding optimal AI implementation in diverse student populations and contributes to the growing literature on educational technology's dual nature as both enhancer and potential hindrance to deep learning.