Impact of ESG ratings on consumer behavior

Last registered on October 03, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Impact of ESG ratings on consumer behavior
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016755
Initial registration date
September 30, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 03, 2025, 10:39 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
National University of Singapore

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
National University of Singapore
PI Affiliation
National University of Singapore

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-09-22
End date
2025-10-22
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues have gained significant prominence in guiding policy development, corporate strategies, and investment decisions. Prominent rating systems -- such as S&P Global’s Dow Jones Sustainability World Index and Bloomberg ESG Ratings -- aim to capture firms’ environmental and social performance, yet they often diverge because of differences in methodology, benchmarks, and theoretical foundations. These inconsistencies raise important questions about how consumers interpret ESG ratings, and whether such ratings influence their choices. Despite growing attention to ESG, empirical evidence on consumer responses remains limited and fragmented.

This paper investigates how companies' ESG ratings influence consumer behavior through an online experiment. We will recruit 1,500 adults to participate in an incentivized survey. Participants will be asked to examine companies with different ESG ratings, and for each company, report their willingness to pay for (i) a gift card that can be used to purchase the company' products and (ii) their willingness to donate to a non-profit initiative sponsored by the company. These two outcome measures will be incentivized. The survey will also include demographic questions, elicit views on environmental issues, and measure behavioral parameters (e.g., risk preference, time preference, and honesty) to explore heterogeneous treatment effects. Finally, we will simulate a major environmental scandal involving a randomly selected company and allow participants to revise their responses, enabling us to examine the extent to which ESG ratings affect a company's resilience to negative news shocks.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Ba, Yuhao, Yuhao Ba and Tong Liu. 2025. "Impact of ESG ratings on consumer behavior." AEA RCT Registry. October 03. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16755-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We will randomly vary the ESG information shown to participants about food & beverage companies.

50% of the participants will be assigned to a Simple condition, which shows only the overall ESG score and grade. These participants will evaluate two companies, shown in a random order: one with an average ESG rating (BBB) and one with a high rating (AA).

The other 50% will be assigned to a Detailed condition, which shows the overall ESG score and grade together with the individual scores for E, S and G. These participants will evaluate six companies in a random order. The six companies differ along two dimensions:
-- Rating: Average (BBB) vs. High (AA)
-- Relative strength: Highest E score vs. Highest S score vs. Highest G score
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2025-09-22
Intervention End Date
2025-10-22

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. Willingness to pay for a $20 gift card that can be used to purchase a company's products
2. Willingness to donate to a non-profit project sponsored by a company (between $0 and $1)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Outcome #1 will be elicited using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism.

Outcome #2 will be elicited in an incentive compatible way, with a positive chance that the reported donation amount is deducted from the participant's payoff and donated to the non-profit on their behalf.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This is an online experiment in which 1,500 subjects will be recruited to complete a survey. The survey consists of five parts:

1. Background views
-- We ask pariticipants' views on topics such as the environment, climate change, and ESG

2. Behavioral measures
-- We elicit participants' risk preferences, time preferences, honesty, and consumption and donation behaviors

3. Main experiment
-- Participants are randomized into either the Simple or Detailed condition (see Interventions above). They will evaluate food and beverage companies with different ESG ratings. For each company, they will be asked to report (a) their willingness to pay for a $20 gift card that can be used to purchase the company's products, and (b) their willingness to donate to a non-profit initiative sponsored by the company.

4. Scandal
-- We simulate a major environmental scandal involving a randomly selected company, and allow participants to revise their responses.

5. Demographic questions
-- We collect demographic information
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done by Qualtrics
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,500
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
750 in Simple condition
750 in Detailed condition
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
National University of Singapore Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2024-11-27
IRB Approval Number
NUS-IRB-2024-826
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials