Young farmers adaptation to climate change in Egypt

Last registered on September 19, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Young farmers adaptation to climate change in Egypt
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016822
Initial registration date
September 19, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
September 19, 2025, 10:30 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
CNRS, CERDI - Université Clermont Auvergne

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Antwerp

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2025-04-01
End date
2026-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Rural youth in low- and middle-income countries face a pivotal choice in the context of accelerating climate change: whether to remain in agriculture or shift to non-agricultural activities. In collaboration with the Egyptian Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation, we run an experiment in Upper Egypt in which 1) young farmers in treatment clusters are provided with tailored information about climate change and on-the-farm adaptation strategies, and 2) young farmers in both the treatment and control clusters are offered job matching services for non-agricultural employment opportunities using a Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism. This design allows us to identify the effect of reducing information frictions about climate change on farmers' beliefs, agricultural practices, and labor allocation across sectors. It also enables us to examine whether the returns to non-agricultural job opportunities are higher for households facing less information frictions.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Gazeaud, Jules and Nada Rostom. 2025. "Young farmers adaptation to climate change in Egypt." AEA RCT Registry. September 19. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16822-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Our interventions are:
1) An interactive information session providing information on climate change, its impacts on agriculture, as well as practical recommendations for adopting climate-smart agriculture practices, including strategies to combat the climate-related fall armyworm pest.
2) Job-matching services in which farmers, after purchasing access through the Becker-Degroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanism, receive assistance in applying to non-agricultural jobs within their governorate and across Egypt.

We use a two-stage design. In the first stage, we implement a clustered RCT with a treatment group and a control group. Eligible individuals in treated clusters—not those in the control clusters—are invited to the information session. In the second stage, everyone is offered the job matching service through a BDM mechanism.

Our target population comprises young male smallholder farmers in Upper Egypt (specifically Assiut and Minya governorates). In selected clusters, we target maize farmers between 18 and 35 years old, who cultivated between 0.25 and 5 feddans in the previous season.
Intervention Start Date
2025-04-01
Intervention End Date
2026-04-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Domain A. Beliefs
1) Beliefs about climate change
2) Beliefs about the feasibility of doing agriculture (nowadays)
3) Beliefs about the feasibility of doing agriculture (future)
4) Beliefs on adaptation to climate change
5) Expected returns of exiting agriculture

Domain B. Labor supply outside agriculture
1) Job search outside agriculture
2) Labor supply outside agriculture

Domain C. Welfare measures
1) Earnings from agriculture
2) Non-agricultural earnings
3) Life satisfaction
4) Mental health
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Domain A. Beliefs
1) Beliefs about climate change
a) Knowledge of climate change: Have you ever heard about climate change?
b) Beliefs about past climate change
- Personally, do you think there has been any changes in the average temperature in the summer?
- Personally do you think there has been any changes in the number of extremely hot days per year?
- The number of extremely hot days 30 years ago was more or less stable at 10 days per year, what do you think was the number of hot days per year in the years around 2020?
c) Beliefs about future climate change
- How do you think average temperature in the summer will change in the future?
- How do you think the number of extreme hot days per year will change in the future?
- The number of extremely hot days nowadays is around 22 days per year, what do you think will be the number of extremely hot days per year in the years 2040?
d) Confidence in beliefs: How confident are you that the changes you mentioned will happen?
e) Knows that the emergence of diseases like armyworm is related to climate change
- Do you think the development of the fall armyworm is related to climatic factors?
- Believes that fall armyworm survives and develops fast in high temperatures

2) Beliefs about the feasibility of doing agriculture (nowadays)
- Nowadays, how hard do you think it is to do agriculture in Assiut?
- Nowadays, do you think it's possible to earn a decent income from agriculture if you use the same agriculture practices you have been using until now?

3) Beliefs about the feasibility of doing agriculture (future)
- In the coming 15 years, how hard do you think it will be to do agriculture in Assiut?
- Do you think it will be possible to earn a decent income from agriculture in the coming 15 years if you continue with the same agriculture practices you have been using until now?

4) Beliefs on adaptation to climate change
a )Need for on-the-farm adaptation: Overall, do you think it becomes necessary to change the way to cultivate the land to cope with the consequences of climate change?
b) Knowledge of on-the-farm adaptation strategies:
- Do you know climate-smart practices that can help you cope with the consequences of climate change?
- Knowledge of how to fight armyworm (index)
c) Need for off-the-farm adaptation: Overall, do you think it becomes necessary to work more outside agriculture to cope with the consequences of climate change?
d) Do you think it will be possible to earn a decent income from agriculture in the coming 15 years if you use the new agriculture practices you know to cope with the climatic changes? (for those who don’t know any practice we modify the end of the question to ask instead *if you use new agriculture practices that can help you cope with the climatic changes?*)

5) Expected returns of exiting agriculture
a) Expected income from agriculture: What is the total amount of money you expect that you will gain from agriculture this season if you work only in agriculture?
b) Expected returns of exiting agriculture: Expected income if they work full-time outside of agriculture (How much do you think you can make per month if you work full time outside of agriculture?) adjusted by the opportunity cost (You previously said that you could earn ${agri_income} from your work in agriculture this season. In case you work outside of agriculture full-time, how much do you think you would lose from this amount this season?)

Domain B. Labor supply outside agriculture
1) Job search outside agriculture
- Plans to look for a job outside of the agriculture sector
- Looked for a job outside of the agriculture sector
- Willingness-to-pay for job matching services for jobs outside of the agriculture sector
2) Labor supply outside agriculture
- Worked at least one hour outside agriculture
- Number of hours worked outside of agriculture
- Monthly earnings outside agriculture

Domain C. Welfare measures
1) Earnings from agriculture
2) Non-agricultural earnings: For migrants, earnings are amenity-adjusted using a question similar to Barnett-Howell et al. (2025): “People often decide where to live based on earnings and quality of life. What is the minimum amount per month that would make you willing to move back to ${village}? As a reminder, you said your current income is ${earning_totalself} per month.”
3) Life satisfaction: In general, on a scale from one to ten, how satisfied are you with your life?
4) Mental health: Did you experience intense periods of worry or anxiety during the last agricultural season?

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1) Migration
2) Long-term aspirations
3) Labor supply agriculture
4) Adoption of climate-smart practices (planting date, planting distance, planting density, use of recommended practices to fight heatwaves and armyworm)
5) Presence and ability to deal with the fall armyworm
6) Household welfare
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
1) Migration
- Migrated outside village of origin
- Migrated outside governorate of origin
- Migrated in big city (Cairo/Alexandria)
- Migrated abroad

2) Long-term aspirations
- In the future, would you like to work more outside of agriculture?
- In the future, would you like to work only outside agriculture? (If yes: Would like to work only outside agriculture even if it involves your main residence won’t be ${bl_location}?)
- Do you feel you want to leave the place where you are currently living?
- Are you planning to migrate abroad?

3) Labor supply agriculture
- Worked at least one hour in agriculture
- Number of hours worked in agriculture

4) Adoption of climate-smart practices (planting date, planting distance, planting density, use of recommended practices to fight heatwaves and armyworm)

5) Presence and ability to deal with the fall armyworm
- Did armyworm, or signs of its existence, appear in your land this summer season?
- Have you been able to control or reduce the presence of the armyworm?
- How much of your production did you lose because of armyworm?

6) Household welfare
- Total earnings
- Food security using the question “In this corn season, how often did you worry that your household would not have enough food?” and “In this corn season, how often did you worry that your household wouldn't be able to eat the foods you like?”

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We plan to operate over the summer seasons 2025 and 2026, when farmers mostly grow maize and suffer increasingly from climate change and its effects on agriculture.

Information intervention: Extension agents in each village provide the list of names of all eligible farmers who live in pre-specified clusters within the village. Our team then visits the farmers and confirms eligibility and willingness to participate in a study on agriculture and youth employment. We use a clustered randomization design.

Job matching services: all individuals are offered the job matching service through a BDM mechanism.

Important aspects to note:

1) Impacts of job matching services: We will look at the effects of the job matching services on the outcome variables in domains B and C. To address endogeneity concerns, we will instrument take-up of the matching services by the random price assigned to each individual. For this analysis standard errors will be clustered at the individual level (the level of randomization).

2) Selection: In this project, we are particularly interested in studying how better information about climate change influences selection into the non-agricultural sector. We plan to conduct two types of analyses. First, among individuals who worked at least one hour outside agriculture, we will regress key individual characteristics on an indicator for the information treatment. Second, we will estimate the heterogeneous effects of job matching services depending on whether individuals received the information treatment. Specifically, we will interact the information treatment and job matching indicators, instrumenting them with the randomly assigned price and its interaction with the information treatment to address endogeneity concerns. For this analysis standard errors will be clustered at the cluster level (the level of randomization).

3) Heterogeneity: All heterogeneity dimensions are measured at baseline and coded as dummy variables. The most important heterogeneity dimensions we expect to study include:
- Beliefs about the feasibility of agriculture
- Beliefs about need for adaptation

4) Spillovers: As with many information interventions, the main threat is related to spillover effects. To determine the unit of randomization, we incorporated both conceptual and practical considerations. Conceptually, we decided to use a clustered RCT (instead of an individual RCT) to limit the potential for spillovers. We also aimed to include a large number of clusters to have enough statistical power to detect modest effects. Practically, because of budget constraints, and because villages in Egypt tend to be very large (the average rural villages have a population of 10,000 in Assiut), we favored clustering at the block (agglomeration) level. We are able to form 4 blocks on average per village. While clustering the intervention at the block level limits the scope for spillovers within blocks it does not tackle concerns over spillovers across blocks. We try to limit them by leaving buffer areas of at least of 180 meters between blocks. Additionally, to test whether this approach is effective, we randomize the share of treated blocks at the larger level (villages in our case) to measure these spillovers. Specifically, in half of the villages only one third of the blocks are randomized into treatment (low-saturation villages), while in the remaining half of the villages two thirds of the blocks are randomized into treatment (high-saturation villages). Comparing control individuals in low-saturation villages to control individuals in high-saturation villages gives an estimate of the spillovers across blocks.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Done in office by computer using STATA
Randomization Unit
Information intervention: agglomerations
Job matching services: individuals
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
300 clusters (target)
Sample size: planned number of observations
1500 farmers (target)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Information: 750 Treatment, 750 Control (target)
Job matching services: 600 Treatment, 900 Control (target)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB of The American University in Cairo
IRB Approval Date
2024-10-28
IRB Approval Number
#2024-2025-050