Prevention of GBV in Kenya

Last registered on March 05, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Prevention of GBV in Kenya
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016831
Initial registration date
September 21, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 05, 2026, 5:59 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Yale University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Yale University
PI Affiliation
Aix-Marseille Université
PI Affiliation
Yale University

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2025-01-01
End date
2026-07-15
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Will be made available upon project completion. Further details are in the Pre-Analysis Plan.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Gu, Junxing et al. 2026. "Prevention of GBV in Kenya." AEA RCT Registry. March 05. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16831-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention is a school-based sexual violence prevention and empowerment curriculum delivered by trained public school teachers in Kenya, which focuses on skills to prevent and respond to sexual harassment/assault and promote safer school environments.
Intervention Start Date
2025-03-01
Intervention End Date
2025-10-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1) Incidences of sexual assault. 2) School attendance. 3) Teen pregnancy and teen marriage (conditional on feasibility of 2026 follow-up tracking).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Sexual assault is measured using girls’ self-reports of forced sex (binary and count, based on whether it occurred and how many times in the past year). Attendance is measured using school administrative attendance records and cross-validated using student self-reports (e.g., days missed and prolonged absence; where feasible, dropout). Teen pregnancy and teen marriage are measured (if 2026 follow-up tracking is feasible) via school roll-call tracking of girls who dropped out due to pregnancy or marriage since the intervention, with possible verification on a subsample of dropouts if logistics permit.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Girls: self-defense skills; awareness of sexual consent; personal initiative (self-efficacy, perseverance/resilience/problem-solving, and agency); perceived safety at school; perceived safety commuting to/from school; rapport and interactions with teachers; relationships with opposite-sex peers (in co-ed schools).
Boys: beliefs about sexual assault, consent, and consequences/deterrence; bystander intervention behaviors; masculinity and help-seeking behaviors; relationships with opposite-sex peers (in co-ed schools).
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary outcomes are measured using student questionnaires at baseline/endline (and teacher questionnaires during teacher trainings). Where multiple survey items capture a construct, outcomes will be aggregated into indices (standardized to mean 0 and SD 1). For some domains we use PCA (first principal component) and for others we use summary indices (including inverse-covariance weighted indices following Anderson (2008) when combining conceptually related components). Examples: girls’ self-defense index aggregates knowledge and reported verbal/physical self-defense; consent-awareness is the first PC of “ability to say no” items; PI sub-indices (self-efficacy, perseverance/resilience/problem-solving, agency) are constructed via PCA and then combined depending on correlations; boys’ beliefs and masculinity/help-seeking are constructed via PCA; intervention behavior is constructed from exposure-to-situation and reported intervention items.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Cluster randomized controlled trial at the school level in Migori County, Kenya, comparing schools assigned to receive the intervention curriculum versus control schools.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization was conducted by computer using a stratified randomization algorithm.
Randomization Unit
School (cluster) level.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
214 schools.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Approximately 8,560 students (about 40 students per school).
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
107 treatment schools and 107 control schools.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Using 214 schools (107 treatment, 107 control) with approximately 20 surveyed students per school per gender and clustering at the school level, the minimum detectable effect (MDE) is approximately 0.09 SD using the baseline ICC estimate (ICC ≈ 0.009). Under more conservative ICC assumptions, MDEs are approximately 0.12 SD (ICC = 0.05) and 0.15 SD (ICC = 0.10), at 5% significance and 80% power.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Yale IRB
IRB Approval Date
2025-02-04
IRB Approval Number
2000039054
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information