Household Demand and Willingness to Pay for Induction Cookstoves: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Cambodia

Last registered on October 01, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Household Demand and Willingness to Pay for Induction Cookstoves: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Cambodia
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016905
Initial registration date
September 29, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 01, 2025, 8:07 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
October 01, 2025, 10:29 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Emory University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Associate Professor, Earth Ocean and Environment, School of the Earth, Ocean and Environment, University of South Carolina
PI Affiliation
Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Environmental Health, Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
PI Affiliation
Assistant Professor, Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, UC Berkeley

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-10-04
End date
2025-11-15
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We estimate household willingness to pay for induction cookstoves in Cambodia. WTP will be estimated in 250 households using the incentive-compatible Becker-deGroot-Marschak mechanism which will elicit demand under real purchase conditions. We assess which household characteristics are associated with WTP.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Prasad, Sridevi et al. 2025. "Household Demand and Willingness to Pay for Induction Cookstoves: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Cambodia." AEA RCT Registry. October 01. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16905-1.1
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
This study assesses the willingness to pay for induction cookstoves in Cambodia using a BDM elicitation.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2025-10-04
Intervention End Date
2025-11-15

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Willingness to pay for induction stove
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Willingness to pay for induction stoves will be measured using the incentive-compatible BDM mechanism.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We will estimate willingness to pay among 250 households in peri-urban Cambodia between October-November 2025. Using the Becker-deGroot-Marschak (BDM) method, eligible participants will receive a visit from a sales agent who will conduct a household survey and give a sales pitch on the induction stove. After collecting demographic information, the sales agent will pitch the induction stove to individual participants and introduce them to the BDM bidding game. In the BDM game, participants will be asked to state their maximum WTP and then randomly select a stove price from a predetermined distribution ranging from $50 (assumed minimum bid) to $180 (stove market price). Participants will play practice BDM rounds for familiar products (soap; stainless steel pot) to ensure they comprehend the bidding/game format.
Experimental Design Details
Within each village, we will recruit 50 households to participate in this study. Households will be stratified by IDPoor status (a government program to provide social services to low-income households), with 25 IDPoor or at-risk households and 25 non-poor households selected in each village. IDPoor and at-risk households will be randomly sampled from the village chief’s list of IDPoor and at-risk households using a random number generator in Excel. Non-poor households will be randomly sampled from the village census using a random number generator in Excel.
Eligible households will receive a visit from a sales agent who will conduct a household survey, which includes a sales pitch on the induction cookstove, to assess willingness to pay. After collecting demographic information, current cookstove ownership, sales agents will present the induction cookstove. The survey will also capture costs associated with their current cookstove ownership as well as present features about the induction cookstove. Benefits of the cookstove highlighted in the pitch will include time savings from cookstove use, safety features, smoke reduction, and fuel cost savings. The pitch will also highlight that induction-compatible pots will need to be used for the cookstove to function.
The sales agent will then introduce the Becker-deGroot-Marschak bidding game. In the BDM game, participants will be asked to state their WTP and then will randomly select a stove price from a predetermined distribution. If their bid is above the stove price, they will be provided with an offer to purchase the stove at that price. If their bid is below the stove price, they will not be able to buy the stove. To orient participants to the BDM bidding process, we will conduct two practice rounds using goods known to the participants (Dizon-Ross & Jayachandran, 2022), such as a bar of soap and a stainless steel pot. The soap and pot will be a non-incentivized good.
We will use on-site bid randomization using a uniform distribution for participants to randomly select a price. Prices will be in sealed envelopes that the participant can choose from. We are opting for on-site randomization as it will improve trust among the participants (Burchardi et al., 2021). The randomized price, p, will be drawn from a continuous distribution where p ~Uniform(50,180).
Randomization Method
On-site randomization at household (random draw of prices from envelopes)
Computer used to sample 10 random prices from uniform distribution [50,180]
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
5 villages
Sample size: planned number of observations
250 households
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
250 households
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Emory University Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2025-04-08
IRB Approval Number
STUDY00007929

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials