Tech-Driven Parenting Support in Fragile Contexts

Last registered on October 06, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Tech-Driven Parenting Support in Fragile Contexts
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0016941
Initial registration date
October 03, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 06, 2025, 3:14 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
World Bank

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
World Bank
PI Affiliation
World Bank

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-02-01
End date
2026-04-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This randomized controlled trial evaluates a digital parenting intervention for caregivers and adolescents in Medellín, Colombia, a context heavily affected by forced displacement. The program, developed by the NGO Sientoxciento and the RISE Institute, delivers positive parenting content through WhatsApp messages and AI-generated videos. Three arms are compared: (1) caregivers receive parenting messages and/or videos, either tailored to baseline needs or delivered in full; (2) caregivers and adolescents both receive the content under the same delivery modalities; and (3) control caregivers receive unrelated messages in the same format. The study includes 6,000 caregiver–adolescent pairs, equally distributed among Venezuelan migrants, internally displaced Colombians, and non-displaced residents, and assesses impacts on caregiver mental health, self-efficacy, and parenting practices, as well as adolescent socioemotional adjustment, mental health, and academic achievement. The evaluation provides policy-relevant evidence on the scalability and effectiveness of technology-enabled parenting interventions to strengthen family resilience in fragile contexts.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Dinarte, Lelys, Sandra Rozo and María José Urbina. 2025. "Tech-Driven Parenting Support in Fragile Contexts." AEA RCT Registry. October 06. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.16941-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
After baseline, caregiver–adolescent pairs will be individually randomized into one of three experimental groups:

Control group: Caregivers receive only unrelated WhatsApp messages and /or videos (to be determined in pilot) that are neutral in content and not connected to parenting, adolescent well-being, or mental health.
Treatment 1: Parent-only treatment: Caregivers receive content-related WhatsApp messages and/or short AI-generated video clips that reinforce positive parenting practices, emotional communication, and socioemotional support strategies (to be determined in pilot). Within this group, assignment is further randomized into two sub-arms:
A. Needs-based messages (50\% of the sample): tailored to the specific parenting problems and skill gaps identified at baseline (e.g., managing conflict, fostering adolescent self-regulation, reducing reliance on physical punishment, improving communication).
B. All messages (50\% of the sample): full set of intervention messages, regardless of baseline needs.

Treatment 2: Parent + adolescent treatment: Both caregivers and adolescents receive content-related WhatsApp messages and/or short AI-generated video clips (to be determined in pilot) . Within this group, assignment is further randomized into two sub-arms:
A. Needs-based messages (50\% of the sample): tailored to the specific problems and skills identified at baseline, focusing on strengthening both caregiver and adolescent capacities.
B. All messages (50\% of the sample: complete set of intervention messages, irrespective of needs.
Intervention Start Date
2026-03-15
Intervention End Date
2026-04-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1-Caregiver Mental Health: Caregiver mental health will be assessed using a combination of self-reported surveys and voice biomarkers. Data will be collected at baseline (self-reported surveys only) and at endline (surveys and voice biomarkers).
2-Caregiver Self-Efficacy: Data will be collected at both baseline and endline.
3-Adolescent Conduct, Emotional Regulation, and Mental Health: Adolescent outcomes will focus on conduct, emotional regulation, and depressive symptoms. Data on adolescent outcomes will be collected only at endline.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1-Parenting Practices on Physical Punishment: Parenting practices will be assessed with a particular focus on the use of physical punishment. Caregivers will self-report the frequency and types of disciplinary strategies employed with adolescents, capturing both punitive and non-punitive approaches. In addition, adolescents will provide self-reports on their experiences of physical punishment, offering an independent perspective on the prevalence and severity of these practices. Data will be collected at baseline and endline.

2-Family Relationships: Family relationships will be assessed through adolescent and caregiver surveys capturing the quality of communication, emotional closeness, and conflict within the household. Data will be collected at both baseline and endline.

3-Community Relationships: Community relationships will be measured using self-reported surveys from both adolescents and caregivers. Indicators will include perceived trust, mutual support, and participation in community activities. Data will be collected at baseline and endline.


4-Adolescent Academic Achievement: Adolescent academic achievement will be measured through a combination of self-reports and caregiver reports, complemented where possible by administrative school records. Data will be collected at baseline and endline.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The study will recruit 6,000 caregiver–adolescent pairs (2,000 per stratum: Venezuelan migrants, internally displaced persons, and non-displaced Colombians) and randomize them across three main experimental arms. The study will be implemented in Medellín (Antioquia) and will target households with at least one adolescent aged 10–17 living with a primary caregiver. We focus on three population groups: (i) Venezuelan migrants, (ii) internally displaced persons (IDPs), and (iii) non-displaced Colombian residents.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Computer randomization
Randomization Unit
caregiver–adolescent pairs
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
n/a
Sample size: planned number of observations
6000
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
2000 per arm
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
The study will recruit 6,000 caregiver–adolescent pairs (2,000 per stratum: Venezuelan migrants, internally displaced persons, and non-displaced Colombians) and randomize them across three main experimental arms. With a two-tailed test at $\alpha$ = 0.05, this sample provides high statistical power to detect modest but policy-relevant changes in caregiver and adolescent outcomes. Under standard assumptions of individual randomization with balanced allocation, no clustering, and covariate adjustment, the minimum detectable effect (MDE) for pooled treatment versus control contrasts is approximately 0.09 standard deviations with 80\% power. For pairwise comparisons between treatment arms (e.g., caregiver-only vs. caregiver+adolescent, needs-based vs. full content), the MDE increases slightly to 0.11–0.12 SD, reflecting reduced effective sample size. Subgroup analyses stratified by displacement status (2,000 pairs per stratum) yield MDEs of approximately 0.16–0.18 SD, which remain within the range of meaningful effects documented in the parenting and mental health literature. These calculations assume 10\% attrition between baseline and endline, consistent with prior survey experience in displaced and low-income populations in Colombia. If attrition is lower, detectable effects will be correspondingly smaller. The study also benefits from repeated measurement of several outcomes at baseline and endline, which further increases power by allowing for precision gains from covariate adjustment. Taken together, the sample size is sufficient to detect effect sizes comparable to those found in meta-analyses of parenting interventions in fragile and low-resource settings (0.2–0.5 SD), ensuring that even conservative estimates of program impacts will be detectable with high confidence.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number