Back to History Current Version

Heuristic Self-Evaluation in Educational Choices

Last registered on November 06, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Heuristic Self-Evaluation in Educational Choices
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017057
Initial registration date
October 30, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
November 03, 2025, 10:55 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
November 06, 2025, 3:54 AM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Tel Aviv University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-11-06
End date
2026-12-01
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This online survey experiment presents hypothetical scenarios about educational decision-making. It randomly varies the (hypothetical) test scores shown to participants to test whether crossing a round-number threshold influences self-evaluation and intentions to pursue selective programs, testing for left-digit bias in test score interpretation.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Goldstein, Yoav. 2025. "Heuristic Self-Evaluation in Educational Choices." AEA RCT Registry. November 06. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17057-1.2
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2025-11-06
Intervention End Date
2025-12-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Self-evaluation measures
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We will measure participants’ self-evaluation through questions about their perceived success on the hypothetical test and their perceived potential to succeed in future academic paths.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Behavioral intentions
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
We will assess behavioral intentions based on participants’ stated choices in hypothetical scenarios. Given the experiment’s small scale, power to detect such effects may be limited; therefore, these outcomes are treated as secondary.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Online survey randomized controlled trial (between subjects).

Participants are asked to imagine taking a university entrance test for the first time while considering admission to a selective and demanding academic program. They then imagine receiving a (randomly assigned) score X. The assigned score is always below but close to the admission cutoff for the desired program. Participants then report their hypothetical self-evaluations and behavioral intentions.

The score X is randomly assigned between 598 and 601. The experiment tests whether receiving a round-number score (600) affects self-evaluation. The main comparison is between participants who receive 600 and those who receive 599. As placebo tests, I also compare 601 versus 600 and 599 versus 598 to examine whether non-round scores produce any effects.

There are two main treatment arms:
- Arm A (treatment, round): score = 600
- Arm B (control, non-round): score = 599
This score appears as part of the scenario presented to each participant ("your entrance-test score is X").

The main causal estimand is the average treatment effect of being assigned score 600 versus 599 on self-evaluation and behavioral-intention outcomes: E[Y | X = 600] − E[Y | X = 599].

As placebo arms, participants may also be assigned scores 598 (Arm C) or 601 (Arm D). These allow tests of whether adjacent non-round scores generate effects. Formally, the placebo tests are: E[Y | X = 601] − E[Y | X = 600] and E[Y | X = 599] − E[Y | X = 598].
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization is implemented online through Qualtrics. Each participant is randomly assigned to one of four arms: Arm A (600), Arm B (599), Arm C (598), or Arm D (601). The assignment probabilities are one-third for Arms A and B and one-sixth for Arms C and D.
Randomization Unit
individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
600 participants
Sample size: planned number of observations
600 participants
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
200 participants assigned to each score of 599 and 600 (total 400).
100 participants assigned to each score of 598 and 601 (total 200).
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Main test (600 versus 599): 0.28 standard deviations. Placebo (pooled 601 vs. 600 and 599 vs. 598): 0.28 standard deviations.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Tel Aviv University
IRB Approval Date
2025-10-30
IRB Approval Number
0011266-1