Back to History

Fields Changed

Registration

Field Before After
Last Published November 06, 2025 03:54 AM February 02, 2026 06:04 AM
Intervention End Date December 01, 2025 April 01, 2026
Experimental Design (Public) Online survey randomized controlled trial (between subjects). Participants are asked to imagine taking a university entrance test for the first time while considering admission to a selective and demanding academic program. They then imagine receiving a (randomly assigned) score X. The assigned score is always below but close to the admission cutoff for the desired program. Participants then report their hypothetical self-evaluations and behavioral intentions. The score X is randomly assigned between 598 and 601. The experiment tests whether receiving a round-number score (600) affects self-evaluation. The main comparison is between participants who receive 600 and those who receive 599. As placebo tests, I also compare 601 versus 600 and 599 versus 598 to examine whether non-round scores produce any effects. There are two main treatment arms: - Arm A (treatment, round): score = 600 - Arm B (control, non-round): score = 599 This score appears as part of the scenario presented to each participant ("your entrance-test score is X"). The main causal estimand is the average treatment effect of being assigned score 600 versus 599 on self-evaluation and behavioral-intention outcomes: E[Y | X = 600] − E[Y | X = 599]. As placebo arms, participants may also be assigned scores 598 (Arm C) or 601 (Arm D). These allow tests of whether adjacent non-round scores generate effects. Formally, the placebo tests are: E[Y | X = 601] − E[Y | X = 600] and E[Y | X = 599] − E[Y | X = 598]. Online survey randomized controlled trial (between subjects). Participants are asked to imagine taking a university entrance test for the first time while considering admission to a selective and demanding academic program. They then imagine receiving a (randomly assigned) score X. The assigned score is always below but close to the admission cutoff for the desired program. Participants then report their hypothetical self-evaluations and behavioral intentions. The score X is randomly assigned between 598 and 601. The experiment tests whether receiving a round-number score (600) affects self-evaluation. The main comparison is between participants who receive 600 and those who receive 599. As placebo tests, I also compare 601 versus 600 and 599 versus 598 to examine whether non-round scores produce any effects. There are two main treatment arms: - Arm A (treatment, round): score = 600 - Arm B (control, non-round): score = 599 This score appears as part of the scenario presented to each participant ("your entrance-test score is X"). The main causal estimand is the average treatment effect of being assigned score 600 versus 599 on self-evaluation and behavioral-intention outcomes: E[Y | X = 600] − E[Y | X = 599]. As placebo arms, participants may also be assigned scores 598 (Arm C) or 601 (Arm D). These allow tests of whether adjacent non-round scores generate effects. Formally, the placebo tests are: E[Y | X = 601] − E[Y | X = 600] and E[Y | X = 599] − E[Y | X = 598].
Back to top

Documents

Field Before After
Document Name Amendment
Custom Type Amendment: Recruitment extension
File
Amendment.docx
MD5: bfba6bb957b0f7931d2e23724ee72c4f
SHA1: ffb5360440975647cc02d7c29716b2dedaf9f6c7
Public Yes
Back to top