Leveling the Playing Field: Can Tech Tools Boost Achievement on Burkina Faso's Primary School Exam?

Last registered on November 10, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Leveling the Playing Field: Can Tech Tools Boost Achievement on Burkina Faso's Primary School Exam?
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017160
Initial registration date
November 04, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
November 10, 2025, 9:11 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
World Bank

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
World Bank
PI Affiliation
Bocconi University and LEAP
PI Affiliation
Cattolica University and LEAP
PI Affiliation
World Bank
PI Affiliation
World Bank

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-01-01
End date
2027-12-01
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Burkina Faso has one of the lowest adult literacy rates globally (25.3%) and has faced a significant decline in educational indicators since 2018. The gross primary enrollment rate fell from 90.7% to 86.1%, while post-primary enrollment dropped from 52% to 47.3%. Educational achievement also varies by gender: boys significantly underperform girls on the high-stakes Certificate of Primary Studies (Certificat d’Etudes Primaires - CEP) exam, creating reverse gender gaps in primary completion rates. We plan to conduct a four-arm school-randomized controlled trial to identify cost-effective technology interventions that can improve learning outcomes while narrowing gender disparities without harming girls' progress. Building on an existing government tablet program that demonstrated operational feasibility since 2022, we test three treatment arms against a pure control: (1) enhanced tablet-based learning with CEP preparation materials for students and teachers; (2) mobile phone-delivered teacher professional development through structured microlearning, and pedagogical coaching; and (3) combined tablet and phone interventions. We address a key implementation constraint by providing solar infrastructure, eliminating the electricity access barrier that has limited technology deployment in schools. Our research design contributes methodologically by enabling direct comparison of student-facing technology, teacher-facing technology, and their complementarity. We measure impacts on CEP performance (overall and by gender), standardized learning assessments across literacy and numeracy domains, retention, technology engagement and resilience to trauma-related conflicts. With comprehensive cost data across treatment arms, we estimate cost-effectiveness ratios to identify scalable solutions. This study advances understanding of how EdTech can address improve learning and close gender gaps in fragile contexts, thus providing rigorous evidence on the relative returns to student-directed versus teacher-mediated technology interventions.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Azzi-Huck, Kaliope et al. 2025. "Leveling the Playing Field: Can Tech Tools Boost Achievement on Burkina Faso's Primary School Exam?." AEA RCT Registry. November 10. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17160-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
This study evaluates technology-enabled pedagogical interventions designed to improve learning outcomes. Primary schools will be randomly assigned to one of four groups:

- Treatment Arm 1: Enhanced Tablet-Based Learning (n≈40 schools)
Fifth and sixth-grade (CM1 and CM2) students and teachers receive Android tablets loaded with CEP-aligned digital learning materials. Content includes exam preparation activities, structured review sessions, practice exercises, and subject-specific resources covering the national curriculum. Materials build upon existing government-developed content with additional CEP-focused preparation modules. Teachers receive training on tablet integration into regular instruction. CEP preparation activities are conducted weekly for several hours during the school term.
This treatment will provide a standardized curriculum, not fully dependent on teacher’s ability. Also, CEP-focused materials familiarize students with question formats, difficulty levels, and competencies expected at the end of primary school. The curriculum will also include pedagogical session to help students to cope with psychological distress due to conflicts.

- Treatment Arm 2: Mobile Phone-Based Teacher Professional Development (n≈40 schools)
Teachers of fifth and sixth-grade students receive structured pedagogical support through mobile phones via WhatsApp. Each week, teachers receive curriculum-aligned microlearning content including sample lessons, practice items, model CEP questions, teaching tips, and formative assessment tools sequenced to align with the national curriculum and CEP exam schedule. The intervention features two-way communication: teachers are encouraged to ask questions, share classroom experiences, submit photos of student work, and report learning difficulties. Project facilitators provide personalized coaching feedback, creating a responsive virtual learning community. Content is delivered in accessible formats (short text messages, voice notes, images) optimized for low-connectivity environments with limited data.
This treatment will improve teachers training through mobile distance support.

- Treatment Arm 3: Combined Intervention (n≈40 schools)
Schools receive both the enhanced tablet-based learning for students and teachers AND the mobile phone-based teacher professional development system, integrating student-facing and teacher-mediated technology support.

- Control Group (n≈40 schools)
Schools continue with standard instruction without additional technology interventions or specialized CEP preparation support.

Implementation features across treatment arms:
- Solar panels or alternative power solutions provided to schools lacking electricity infrastructure, removing a key barrier to participation
- Teacher training delivered through a combination of face-to-face and distance learning modalities to optimize cost-effectiveness and scalability
- Technical support available remotely, with teachers able to report issues via screenshots and receive guidance from project technicians
- All interventions span the academic year, targeting students in fifth and sixth grades during the critical period before CEP examination
- The tablet- and mobile-based curriculum will feature dedicated pedagogical sessions that help students cope with trauma and psychological distress arising from the protracted conflict in Burkina Faso.
Intervention Start Date
2026-01-01
Intervention End Date
2026-06-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. CEP Exam Performance
- Overall CEP pass rates (school-level and individual-level)
- CEP scores (overall and by subject area)
2. Student Retention and Participation
- Student enrollment rates in CM1 and CM2
- Student attendance rates
- Dropout rates
3. Technology Engagement (Treatment Arms Only)
- Frequency of tablet use by students (Treatment Arms 1 and 3)
- Frequency of tablet use by teachers (Treatment Arms 1 and 3)
- Teacher participation rates in mobile phone-based professional development (Treatment Arms 2 and 3)
- Teacher response rates to weekly prompts and coaching interactions (Treatment Arms 2 and 3)
- Quality of teacher engagement with mobile platform content (Treatment Arms 2 and 3)


Data sources:
- Administrative data from schools and national education records
- Direct student assessments
- Digital usage analytics from tablets and mobile platforms
- Teacher surveys and activity logs
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Design Type: School-level cluster randomized controlled trial with four parallel arms

Sample and Randomization:
Approximately 160 primary schools will be randomly assigned to one of four groups using computer-generated random assignment:
- Treatment Arm 1: Enhanced tablet-based learning (n≈40 schools)
- Treatment Arm 2: Mobile phone-based teacher professional development (n≈40 schools)
- Treatment Arm 3: Combined tablet and phone intervention (n≈40 schools)
- Control Group: Standard instruction (n≈40 schools)
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization will be conducted by computer.
Randomization Unit
The unit of randomization is the school, while the primary units of analysis include schools, teachers, and individual students in grades fifth and sixth. All students and teachers within treatment schools will be exposed to their assigned intervention.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
160 schools.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Approximately 40 students per school.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
40 school per arm.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number