Household Communication and Health Investments for Elderly Women in Tamil Nadu

Last registered on November 10, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Household Communication and Health Investments for Elderly Women in Tamil Nadu
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017182
Initial registration date
November 09, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
November 10, 2025, 10:22 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
MIT
PI Affiliation
Tamil Nadu Indian Administrative Service (Retired)Tamil Nadu Indian Administrative Service (Retired)
PI Affiliation
J-PAL South Asia

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-11-10
End date
2026-06-01
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study investigates household dynamics in communication and take-up for health check-ups for elderly women in Tamil Nadu. We conduct our study in two parts. In part 1, we survey elders and their caretakers to measure demand for check-ups for elders using incentivized choices over health check-ups, varying the degree of caretaker involvement required across check-up variants. In part 2, for households where we are able to reach both the elder and their caretaker, we will conduct a randomized evaluation of interventions to improve take-up of free health check-ups at a nearby private hospital. We will cross-randomize two interventions. First, we will randomize who is informed about the check-up: either only the elder is informed or both the elder and the caretaker are informed about the check-up. Second, we will randomize whether free transportation is provided to and from the check-up. We will measure take-up of the check-up. We will also measure elders’ willingness to mention the check-up to the caretaker.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Falézan, Camille et al. 2025. "Household Communication and Health Investments for Elderly Women in Tamil Nadu." AEA RCT Registry. November 10. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17182-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
(Part 2 - Take-up RCT) Pairs of elders and caretakers will be randomized into one of the four cross-randomized treatment arms. The first randomized intervention is telling both the elder and caretaker about the checkup – compared to an arm in which we only tell the elder. The second randomized intervention is providing free arranged transportation to and from the check-up – compared to an arm in which no transportation is provided.
Intervention Start Date
2025-11-10
Intervention End Date
2026-06-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Part 1: Demand for check-up (survey-based choice). This will be a measure of whether the respondent chose check-up over alternative free gift/program in the incentivized choice questions. We have this measure for both elders and caretakers.

Part 2: Demand for check-up (behavior). This will be a measure of whether households signed up for the check-up.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1. (Take-up) Whether the caretaker calls to sign up for the check-up
2. (Take-up) Attendance at check-up
3. (Mention rates) Whether elder chooses to mention check-up to caretaker when offered
4. (Mention rates) Whether elder mentions check-up to caretaker, as reported by caretaker
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Part 1: Measuring demand for check-ups for elders and caretakers. The sample for the initial elder survey will comprise approximately 1,200 elderly women from Ranipet district in Tamil Nadu, India. In the initial survey, we will measure elders’ demand for check-ups, barriers to healthcare, and collect caretaker information. In this survey, we will also collect incentivized choices to measure demand for health check-ups and how this varies with the degree of caretaker involvement required. We will then survey caretakers and ask them the same set of incentivized choices to measure demand for check-ups for the elder.

Part 2: RCT to test interventions to increase take-up of check-ups. Among households where we are able to reach both the elder and caretaker for a follow-up survey, we will invite all elders to a free heart check-up at a nearby private hospital. We will cross-randomize two interventions aimed at improving take-up of the check-up. Informing the caretaker (as well as the elder) of the check-up directly will be randomized across households, and free transportation will be randomized across small clusters of households that are geographically close to one another. The primary outcome of take-up for the check-up will be measured approximately one week after the invitations are delivered. Other outcomes will be measured in the few days after the invitations are delivered (mention rates and whether caretaker called to sign up for the check-up).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Part 1 (Measuring demand): Randomization will be done in SurveyCTO.
Part 2 (Take-up RCT): Randomization will be done in Stata and R.
Randomization Unit
Part 1 (Measuring demand):
Randomization of which choice is implemented will be at the pair-level (elder-caretaker pairs).
Other logistical randomizations regarding the presentation of the choice questions in the survey are all independently randomized at the individual respondent-level (e.g. ordering of choices, which choices are shown, cash transfer amount).

Part 2 (Take-up RCT):
Who is told about check-up (elder only vs both elder and caretaker) will be randomized at the elder-level
Free transportation will be randomized at the cluster-level, where clusters are defined as small groups of households that are geographically close to one another
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
(Part 2 - Take-up RCT) For the free transport intervention: Between 200 and 500 clusters, small groups of households that are geographically close to one another
Sample size: planned number of observations
(Part 1 - Measuring demand from elders) Approximately 1,200 elders. We expect a maximum sample size of up to 1,500 elders, if recruiting permits. (Part 1 - Measuring demand from caretakers; Part 2 - Take-up RCT) Approximately 800 pairs of elders and caretakers (1,600 individuals). We expect a maximum sample size of up to 1,200 pairs of elders and caretakers if recruiting permits (2,400 individuals)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
(Part 2 - Take-up RCT) Among pairs of elders and caretakers where we were able to survey both participants:
- 50% of pairs (N=400 pairs) will be assigned to “tell elder only” arm and - 50% of pairs (N=400 pairs) will be assigned to “tell caretaker and elder” arm
- 20% of clusters will be assigned to “free transport” arm (M=40 clusters) and 80% of clusters will be assigned to “no transport” arm (M=160 clusters)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2025-06-11
IRB Approval Number
2505001660
IRB Name
IFMR Human Subjects Committee
IRB Approval Date
2025-06-27
IRB Approval Number
10989
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information