Climate Security and Informal Settlements: Evidence from Sierra Leone

Last registered on November 21, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Climate Security and Informal Settlements: Evidence from Sierra Leone
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017263
Initial registration date
November 17, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
November 21, 2025, 8:06 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
London School of Economics

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of California Berkeley
PI Affiliation
IGC
PI Affiliation
London School of Economics

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-02-01
End date
2027-10-01
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Rapid urban expansion in Sub-Saharan Africa has pushed low-income households into informal settlements located in areas increasingly exposed to coastal flooding and landslides. Freetown, Sierra Leone exemplifies this challenge: large informal neighborhoods occupy low-lying coastal zones that face severe seasonal flooding, yet previous government relocation efforts—typically top-down, peripheral, and poorly aligned with residents’ preferences—have largely failed. This project provides the first integrated empirical and structural assessment of whether, and how, governments should facilitate the voluntary relocation of households living in high-risk informal settlements.

We proceed in four steps. First, we quantify the economic, health, and fiscal costs of recurrent flooding by combining a novel panel survey of 3,000 households with administrative expenditure data and high-frequency water-level monitors installed across at-risk communities. Second, we implement a spatially conditional housing-subsidy experiment to estimate household preferences over housing and neighborhood attributes. Through a Multiple Price List design, households choose between remaining in their current dwelling or relocating to safer neighborhoods under varying subsidy levels, enabling us to identify the minimum compensation required to induce voluntary movement and the heterogeneity in these thresholds. Third, we use randomized subsidy offers and a follow-up panel to estimate the causal impacts of relocation on economic outcomes, health, and human capital. Finally, we study how to prevent re-encroachment of vacated land. We elicit community leaders’ willingness to enforce no-build zones and combine these data with relocation impacts and compensation costs in a dynamic quantitative spatial model tailored to a low-income, high-informality context.

Together, the project will generate the first evidence on the welfare gains from relocating households away from climate-vulnerable areas and the policy instruments most likely to achieve sustained, voluntary reductions in exposure.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Bakarr Kamara, Abou et al. 2025. "Climate Security and Informal Settlements: Evidence from Sierra Leone." AEA RCT Registry. November 21. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17263-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention offers households living in flood-prone informal settlements the chance to win housing subsidies tied to specific safer neighborhoods in Freetown. Using a Multiple Price List (MPL), each participant chooses between staying in their current home or relocating with a randomly assigned subsidy covering 25–100% of annual rent. Subsidy terms are revealed via scratchcards, creating randomized variation in the attractiveness of moving. Lottery winners independently secure housing in their assigned neighborhood, and the project pays the subsidy directly to landlords. Follow-up surveys track winners and non-winners for 18 months to measure the causal impacts of relocation.
Intervention Start Date
2026-02-01
Intervention End Date
2027-10-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Household welfare. Labor market outcomes and income, health, social networks, expenditure, mental health and psychological wellbeing.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Households will be given a series of choices between locations and housing types at different levels of subsidy. After they make choices, a card will be scratched to determine if they are a "winner". For "winners" one of their choices will be chosen to be "implemented." If they chose to move in that choice they will be given a moving subsidy and help to find a new home in a safe part of Freetown.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization will be done by computer and revealed to participants via a scratch card.
Randomization Unit
Individual.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
2000 households
Sample size: planned number of observations
2000 households
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1000 to be treated, 1000 in control
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Committee for Protection of Human Subjects UC Berkeley
IRB Approval Date
2025-07-24
IRB Approval Number
00006252