You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Back to History Current Version

Transmission - Investment Task

Last registered on January 09, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Transmission - Investment Task
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017533
Initial registration date
December 20, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 09, 2026, 8:43 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Cologne

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2025-12-20
End date
2025-12-23
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Analysis plan
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Graeber, Thomas, Shakked Noy and Christopher Roth. 2026. "Transmission - Investment Task." AEA RCT Registry. January 09. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17533-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2025-12-20
Intervention End Date
2025-12-23

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
(i) the respondent’s belief about the message originator’s prediction about the state of the
world;
(ii) the respondent’s belief about the originator’s uncertainty, as measured on a scale ranging
from 0 (extremely uncertain) to 100 (extremely certain).
(iii) We will examine the transcripts of transmitted messages. Using a large language model
(such as GPT-5-2) we will classify each transcript according to whether it contains explicit
statements about the original message’s level prediction and the original message’s
uncertainty.
(iv) Participants then allocate a total of $100 across three state-contingent assets tied to the
earnings outcome: (i) earnings at least 2% above expectations, (ii) earnings at least 2%
below expectations, or (iii) earnings within ±2% of expectations. Allocations must sum to
$100 and can be distributed freely across assets. After the earnings announcement (Q1
2026), only the asset corresponding to the realized outcome pays off, yielding $2 per $1
invested; the other assets pay zero. Our outcome here is the amount allocated to bucket (i)
minus the amount allocated to bucket (ii); we examine the mean of this outcome across the
4 level x certainty quadrants in our original scripts, controlling for prior beliefs about the
company’s earnings performance.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The full experiment comprises two separate data collections that build on each other, a
transmitter experiment and a listener experiment. The two experimental collections rely on
different respondent samples.

Transmitter experiment:
Participants listen to two short recordings played consecutively and without a break, each
one of an opinion piece providing a qualitative narrative about whether earnings
performance of a company is higher or lower than expected. Then, they record their own
summary of these recordings, separately for the first and second company.
A randomly chosen 50% of transmitters will be asked their prior belief about each variable
before hearing the recordings, and all transmitters will be asked for the beliefs
described above after recording their transmitted message for each company.

Recording treatment arms:
Within each company, we randomize three key features of the original recordings:
Level of variable: We randomize whether the piece argues for higher than expected or lower
than expected earnings.

Uncertainty of message: Second, we randomize the uncertainty of the original message. We
randomly assign respondents to original opinions that either argue that earnings will certainly
be higher (or lower) than expected, or that earnings will probably be higher (or lower) than
expected but that things could go either way.

Randomization is stratified: each transmitter hears two recordings, one with a “higher” and
one with a “lower,” one with “high uncertainty” and one with “low uncertainty”.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
In the transmitter experiment, we plan to collect 300 completes.
In the listener experiment, we plan to collect 1200 respondents.
Sample size: planned number of observations
In the transmitter experiment, we plan to collect 300 completes. In the listener experiment, we plan to collect 1200 respondents.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
See analysis plan.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Harvard University-Area Committee on the Use of Human Subjects
IRB Approval Date
2023-03-27
IRB Approval Number
IRB23-0080
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Pre-analysis plan investment task

MD5: b357f281e1504d40ee88ae70374f5f4b

SHA1: c13fbd0e7a9bc8ab79aceb4d45f644a79d22dbb2

Uploaded At: December 20, 2025

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials