Information, Service Delivery, and Citizen Engagement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in San Diego

Last registered on January 12, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Information, Service Delivery, and Citizen Engagement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in San Diego
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017630
Initial registration date
January 10, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 12, 2026, 8:18 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Southern California, Economics Department

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
MIT Sloan School of Business
PI Affiliation
University of Southern California, Economics Department

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-01-10
End date
2026-11-07
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study tests whether (a) providing residents with an informational door‑hanger about the City of San Diego’s 311 “Get‑It‑Done” (GID) system and (b) recent visible service delivery (a recent pothole repair on a resident’s street) change knowledge, attitudes, and City services requesting behavior. We will randomize street segments to receive door‑hangers and conduct door‑to‑door surveys on a weekly basis. The study population is City‑maintained residential street segments, focusing on single‑family homes, with coverage across all nine Council Districts over the course of about seven months. Primary outcomes are survey measures (GID knowledge and perceptions) and administrative behaviors (subsequent GID requests). Analyses compare door‑hanger vs control and recent‑fix segments vs unfixed controls, using regression adjustment with baseline request rates. The survey is cross‑sectional (one contact per household); behavioral follow‑up relies on administrative data observed up to several months after fieldwork.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Schonholzer, David, Benjamin Vatter and Yifei Wang. 2026. "Information, Service Delivery, and Citizen Engagement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in San Diego." AEA RCT Registry. January 12. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17630-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Door Hanger (DH): In selected weekly bundles of street segments, segments are randomized to (i) Full-DH (all addresses on segment receive a door hanger), (ii) Partial-DH (exactly half of addresses on segment receive a door hanger), or (iii) Control-DH (no addresses receive door hangers). Door hangers provide instructions and a QR/URL for using San Diego’s Get-It-Done (GID) system.

Door-to-Door Survey (D2DS): Starting in week 2, a subset of bundles are selected for an in-person survey of adult residents to measure service beliefs, GID awareness/usage, and pothole-related perceptions. Four of six weekly D2DS bundles are drawn from the prior week’s DH bundles and two are drawn from bundles without DH but with recent pothole reports.

Pothole Fix (PF): Not randomized. We construct PF(x) indicators for whether pothole reports are fixed within x∈{1,…,7} days. For identification, we exploit standardized pothole crew allocation mechanisms by the Transportation Department.
Intervention Start Date
2026-01-10
Intervention End Date
2026-08-08

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Administrative (segment-level, from GID):
- weekly counts/indicators of pothole service requests
- weekly counts/indicators of non-pothole service requests
- weekly counts/indicators of any service requests
Also cumulative outcomes at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment week.

Survey (D2DS):
- General views of City services
- Overall satisfaction with City services; perceived efficiency and fairness in the use of tax dollars.
- Awareness of the GID app/website; prior use of GID for any services; reasons for non-use.
- Whether respondents have noticed potholes on their street or nearby; whether they have noticed recent pothole repairs.
- Perceived costs and policy preferences related to potholes
- Perceived disruption from potholes; support for hypothetical tax increases earmarked for faster pothole repairs.
- Expected time to repair potholes with and without citizen reporting.
- Perceptions of how many neighbors notice potholes, know about GID, and would report potholes.
- How respondents typically travel around the city and time spent on city roads.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study is a field experiment in the City of San Diego evaluating how information provision affects citizen engagement with municipal services. Street segments are randomly assigned to receive different levels of exposure to an informational door hanger about the City’s service request system, including a control condition with no door hanger.

Outcomes are measured using administrative data on service requests aggregated at the street-segment level and, for a subset of locations, survey responses measuring beliefs and perceptions about City services. Pothole repairs themselves are not randomized and are analyzed using observed variation in repair timing.

A pilot was conducted prior to the study and is excluded from the analysis.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Door-hanger treatment is randomized at the street-segment level within selected geographic bundles of segments. Door-to-door survey (D2DS) locations are selected at the bundle level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
Administrative outcomes: ~13,000 eligible street segments (segment-week panel), of which ~1,500–2,000 segments are expected to be sampled into door-hanger field operations over the study period. Survey outcomes: ~1,400 responding households (door-to-door survey).
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Door-hanger randomization (street segments): 50% Control-DH, 25% Partial-DH, 25% Full-DH (shares of sampled segments).
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
MIT Committee on the Use of Humans as Experimental Subjects
IRB Approval Date
2025-10-10
IRB Approval Number
E-7213
IRB Name
University of Southern California Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2025-10-07
IRB Approval Number
UP-25-00768