Pollution and Productivity

Last registered on January 22, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Pollution and Productivity
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017716
Initial registration date
January 17, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 22, 2026, 7:04 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
UCSD

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Tufts University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-01-16
End date
2026-03-20
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Air pollution is a major constraint to health and economic productivity in low- and middle-income countries, yet its effects on labor productivity in industrial settings remain poorly understood. Prior research in garment factories in Dhaka, Bangladesh, showed that installing portable air purifiers reduced indoor PM2.5 exposure by 12.7 µg/m³ and increased worker productivity by approximately 10 percent under real-world conditions. This project builds on that evidence to study the mechanisms underlying the pollution–productivity relationship and the conditions that modulate productivity gains from cleaner air. We conduct a randomized field experiment with garment workers participating in a one-day production task in a controlled factory setting. Workers are randomly assigned to one of eight treatment arms in a two-by-four factorial design that varies indoor air quality (placebo, low, medium, and high air purification settings) and economic incentives (baseline versus high piece-rate pay). The design allows us to estimate a dose-response relationship between air pollution exposure and productivity, and to test whether financial incentives amplify or attenuate productivity responses to cleaner air. Primary outcomes include worker productivity measured as garments completed during the shift. The experiment is designed to provide causal evidence on whether productivity responds non-linearly to pollution reduction and whether incentive structures shape workers’ behavioral responses to environmental conditions.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Garg, Teevrat and Maulik Jagnani. 2026. "Pollution and Productivity." AEA RCT Registry. January 22. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17716-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention consists of randomly varying indoor air quality and economic incentives in a controlled garment factory setting. Indoor air quality is manipulated using portable air purifiers set at different intensities (placebo, low, medium, and high), generating exogenous variation in workers’ exposure to PM2.5. Economic incentives are varied by randomly assigning workers to either a baseline or higher piece-rate pay scheme. These interventions are combined in a two-by-four factorial design to study how changes in workplace air quality and incentive structures affect worker productivity.
Intervention Start Date
2026-01-16
Intervention End Date
2026-03-20

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Worker productivity
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Pieces produced. quality of pieces produced

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
performance on cognitive tests, non-invasive clinical measurements
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The study uses a randomized field experiment to examine how indoor air quality and economic incentives affect worker productivity. Garment workers participate in a one-day production task in a controlled factory setting and are randomly assigned to one of eight experimental conditions in a two-by-four factorial design. The experiment varies indoor air quality across four levels using portable air purifiers (placebo, low, medium, and high settings) and varies economic incentives across two levels by assigning workers to either a baseline or higher piece-rate pay scheme. Each worker is exposed to only one treatment condition. Productivity is measured as the number of garments completed during the shift, and indoor air pollution levels are monitored throughout the workday.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
Randomization is at the worker level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
650 workers
Sample size: planned number of observations
650
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Equally distributed across 8 treatment arms
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
UC San Diego
IRB Approval Date
2025-12-11
IRB Approval Number
813860
IRB Name
University of Dhaka
IRB Approval Date
2025-12-21
IRB Approval Number
IHE/IRB/DU/74/2025/Final