Gender Norms, the Dating Market, and Job Search: A Second Experiment

Last registered on November 07, 2016

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Gender Norms, the Dating Market, and Job Search: A Second Experiment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0001774
Initial registration date
November 07, 2016

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
November 07, 2016, 9:52 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
November 07, 2016, 11:20 PM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Harvard University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Princeton University
PI Affiliation
University of Chicago

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2016-11-08
End date
2016-11-30
Secondary IDs
Abstract
This registration regards an additional experiment to complement the results from the experiment registered as AEARCTR-0001456 ("Gender Norms, the Dating Market, and Job Search"). The objective is to pre-register how the data will be analyzed.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Bursztyn, Leonardo, Thomas Fujiwara and Amanda Pallais. 2016. "Gender Norms, the Dating Market, and Job Search: A Second Experiment." AEA RCT Registry. November 07. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.1774-2.0
Former Citation
Bursztyn, Leonardo, Thomas Fujiwara and Amanda Pallais. 2016. "Gender Norms, the Dating Market, and Job Search: A Second Experiment." AEA RCT Registry. November 07. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/1774/history/11686
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2016-11-08
Intervention End Date
2016-11-10

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The questionnaire asks students to make three choices over hypothetical jobs.

Question 1:
Job A: A job with a high salary that requires 55-60 hours of work per week.
Job B: A job with a lower salary that requires 45-50 hours of work per week.

Question 2:
Job A. The work has a positive social impact, but you would not interact often with co-workers.
Job B. The job has a collegial and collaborative work impact, but the work does not have a social impact.

Question 3:
Job A. The job provides the opportunity of rapid promotion to partner, but requires constant travel.
Job B. The job has no travel, but promotion to partner level is slower and less certain.

Question 2 does not allow us to test our hypothesis; we have no predictions over the results of this question. However, in Questions 1 and 3, choosing Job A would provide a positive signal to the labor market, while Job B would provide a positive signal to the marriage market (for women). We expect single women's answers to be tailored to the marriage market more when their male classmates can see their answers than when their female classmates can. Thus, we expect in Questions 1 and 3, single women to choose job A more when they are placed in a group with women then when they are placed in a group with men.

Because we have limited power, our analysis focuses on the responses of single women. The vast majority of non-single women will be placed into all-female groups. However, we can compare the rates at which single and non-single women choose Job A in Questions 1 and 3 in all-female groups. If single women only respond to marriage market concerns when placed in a group with men, we expect the rates of choosing Job A to be similar among single and non-single women in all-female groups.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
In their career class, first-year MBA students will be asked to fill out a questionnaire during their small group work. The questionnaire will ask them to choose which of two hypothetical jobs they would prefer in three different comparisons. Students are told that if there is time at the end of class, the answers will be discussed in their small groups with the instructor. Thus, students will know that both the career office and their small group-mates may be able to see their answer. What is different between the "treatment" and "control" groups is who those group-mates are. Because we have limited power and our previous work has shown that only single women are responsive to their actions being made public to peers, we focus on single women.

Some single women will be in groups with only other women while others will be in groups with only men. We will compare the choices of single women in groups with women and single women in groups with men.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization in office by computer
Randomization Unit
Individuals are randomized into groups; the treatment is the gender of the peers. Single women with male peers are the only female in their group. Single women with female peers may have other single women in their group.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
42 clusters
Sample size: planned number of observations
59 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
30 individuals (13 clusters) with female peers
29 individuals (29 clusters) with male peers
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Redacted for privacy
IRB Approval Date
2016-03-28
IRB Approval Number
Redacted for privacy

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials