Discrimination against Pre-PhD Students

Last registered on June 03, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Discrimination against Pre-PhD Students
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017745
Initial registration date
May 29, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 03, 2026, 9:16 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Cologne

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Mannheim
PI Affiliation
Ruhr-University Bochum

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-06-02
End date
2026-07-10
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The study investigates early-career everyday discrimination towards potential future researchers.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Doerrenberg, Philipp, Christoph Feldhaus and Paula Scholz. 2026. "Discrimination against Pre-PhD Students." AEA RCT Registry. June 03. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17745-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Our target group is contacted, and we measure early-career everyday discrimination towards potential future researchers.
Intervention Start Date
2026-06-02
Intervention End Date
2026-06-16

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Response rate in the survey.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Dummy variable which is equal to one if the researcher has participated in the survey, (i.e. clicked on the survey link in the email / opened link in the browser), and zero otherwise.
For this variable, it does not matter which or how many answers have been provided in the survey.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Effort Provision
We will repeat the analyses for the primary outcome variable for this secondary outcome.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Number of answers provided in the survey.
We count the provision of consent as the first answer. If a researcher actively chooses the option to not provide consent, their “effort provision” will be equal to one. Subjects can answer 7 questions (including consent provision) in Part 1 of the survey and 110 questions in Part 2. Hence, the maximum number of answers is 117. The number of answers can be zero even if the researcher has participated in the survey (by clicking on the link but not answering the question on consent). If a researcher participates multiple times in the survey, we will consider participation with the maximum number of answers as the one relevant to measure their effort provision.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
See experimental design (hidden)
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization is done in python using stochatreat. We stratify the list of researchers into four strata:
1) Gender (Female/Male),
2) Field (Economics/Business Administration),
3) Country (Germany, Switzerland, Austria), and
4) Type of Position (Tenured/Non-Tenured).

Randomization is done in 2 steps.

1) All researchers, excluding those who are employed at the University of Cologne, University of Mannheim or Ruhr-University Bochum, will be randomized into 36 groups as described above.
2) For each of the excluded universities in step 1 separately, we randomly allocate the researchers into 24 groups as described above.
3) We combine the groups of steps 1 and 2 to have 36 groups in total. Each student will contact researchers of two groups, with none of the groups containing researchers from their own university. To one of their groups, they will send emails including the expression of interest in doing a PhD. To the other group, they will send emails without that addition.
Randomization Unit
Receiver of the email
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Treatment is not clustered
Sample size: planned number of observations
The number of observations corresponds to the number of professors and postdoctoral researchers whose emails we have collected. Our final sample contains 4472 researchers and their email addresses.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
We will randomly send each researcher one email which is i) either sent by a man or a woman and ii) indicates interest in pursuing a PhD or not.

9 male students and 9 female students will send the emails. Our sample contains 1375 female and 3097 male researchers.

See below for the sample sizes in the treatment arms:

Male Sender:
- PhD Interest Mail & Male Researcher: 769 researchers/ planned emails
- Mail w/o PhD Interest & Male Researcher: 776 researchers/planned emails
- PhD Interest Mail & Female Researcher: 347 researchers/planned emails
- Mail w/o PhD Interest & Female Researcher: 333 researchers/planned emails

Female Sender:
- PhD Interest Mail & Male Researcher: 783 researchers/planned emails
- Mail w/o PhD Interest & Male Researcher: 769 researchers/planned emails
- PhD Interest Mail & Female Researcher: 343 researchers/planned emails
- Mail w/o PhD Interest & Female Researcher: 352 researchers/planned emails


Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Ethical Review Board of the FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES
IRB Approval Date
2026-01-15
IRB Approval Number
260003PS