Abstract
Despite widespread access to online job postings, large disparities in employment outcomes persist among similarly qualified candidates, suggesting that informational frictions extend beyond vacancy access. This paper argues that process knowledge about how hiring processes operate is a key and understudied source of advantage. Unlike vacancy information, process knowledge is unevenly distributed through social networks and is strategically costly to share in competitive, rank-order selection environments. Using a lab-in-the-field experiment with university students in Pakistan competing for real jobs, the paper causally examines how access to process knowledge affects information-sharing behaviour.