Behavioural Nudges and Income Bunching below Tax Thresholds: Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials in Indonesia

Last registered on January 28, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Behavioural Nudges and Income Bunching below Tax Thresholds: Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials in Indonesia
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017769
Initial registration date
January 26, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 28, 2026, 7:49 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
DGT

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
MOF Indonesia
PI Affiliation
MOF Indonesia
PI Affiliation
MOF Indonesia
PI Affiliation
MOF Indonesia

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2025-12-15
End date
2026-04-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The aim of this trial is to investigate how behvioural nudges affect income reporting behaviour around statutory tax threshold, with a particular focus on income bunching among individual taxpayers in Indonesia. Using a large-scale randomised controlled trials, the intervention delivers targeted informational (norms and public goods provision), and deterrence-based emails to around 850,000 taxpayers whose reported income lies close to the threshold that triggers higher tax obligations. The analysis evaluates whether these nudges influence both the likelihood and magnitude of income bunching below the threshold, and whether observed responses persist over time.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Effendi, Subagio et al. 2026. "Behavioural Nudges and Income Bunching below Tax Thresholds: Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials in Indonesia." AEA RCT Registry. January 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17769-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention consists of behaviourally informed email communications sent to individual taxpayers whose reported income lies within a predefined bandwidth around a statutory tax threshold that triggers higher tax obligations. The objective of the intervention is to influence income reporting behaviour, particularly the propensity to report income just below the threshold.

Eligible taxpayers are randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms, each receiving a single email conveying a distinct behavioural message:

Deterrence email: This message emphasises statutory filing obligations and reporting deadlines, the administrative penalty for late or incorrect filing. It also highlights the possibility of further enforcement actions in cases of non-compliance

Localised peers norms email: This message provides information on income reporting behaviour among geographically proximate or economically similar taxpayers. Specifically, it highlights the proportion of comparable taxpayers in the recipient’s local area or peer group who report income above the statutory threshold, with the aim of conveying prevailing compliance norms.

Public goods provision email: This message highlights the role of individual income tax contributions in financing public expenditure, with particular emphasis on government spending related to education.

All messages are delivered through official Directorate General of Taxes email communication channels. Visual elements, including colours and graphical layout, are designed to enhance message salience and readability, drawing on established findings in the behavioural and colour psychology literature.
Intervention Start Date
2026-02-09
Intervention End Date
2026-03-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Reported taxable income relative to the threshold.
Reported taxable income compared to the previous period.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Total tax liability reported.
Filing timeliness.
Subsequent compliance in later tax periods
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The study employs a large-scale randomised controlled trial to examine how behavioural nudges affect income reporting behaviour around statutory tax thresholds. The experimental sample consists of individual taxpayers whose baseline reported income lies within a predefined bandwidth around the threshold that triggers higher tax obligations. Eligible taxpayers are randomly assigned at the individual level to one of several treatment arms—deterrence, public goods provisions, or localised peer norms—or to a control group that receives no additional communication. Randomisation is stratified on pre-treatment characteristics, including baseline income, distance to the threshold, compliance history, sector, gender, and geographic location, to ensure balance across groups. All interventions are delivered through official tax authority email channels during the same intervention window, allowing for a clean comparison of treatment effects on subsequent income reporting and bunching behaviour over time
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
The study employs an individual-level stratified randomisation design. Eligible taxpayers are first partitioned into strata based on pre-treatment characteristics, including baseline reported income bins around the statutory tax threshold, distance to the threshold, prior compliance history, economic sector, gender, and geographic location. Within each stratum, taxpayers are randomly assigned to one of the treatment arms—deterrence, tax literacy, or localised peer norms—or to a control group using a computer-generated random number process. The randomisation is implemented using a fixed random seed to ensure reproducibility, and assignment probabilities are identical across strata. This procedure ensures balance in observable baseline characteristics across experimental groups while preserving the internal validity of the causal estimates.
Randomization Unit
individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
-
Sample size: planned number of observations
850,000 taxpayers
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
control: 77,700
T1: 230,000
T2:230,000
T3:230,000
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Public Relations Directorate DGT
IRB Approval Date
2026-01-12
IRB Approval Number
N/A
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Pre Analysis Plan

MD5: a6c1a66bc70bc13d0a213026de52285d

SHA1: d76af977288ef020af359b238690dbfa842982d1

Uploaded At: January 26, 2026