Student Gender and Teachers’ Career Guidance

Last registered on March 16, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Student Gender and Teachers’ Career Guidance
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017779
Initial registration date
March 15, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 16, 2026, 7:20 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Kobe University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Duke University
PI Affiliation
Tohoku University
PI Affiliation
University of California, Berkeley

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-04-24
End date
2029-03-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Teachers often play an important role in advising students about post-secondary educational choices. In settings where students apply to a limited number of programs defined by university–major pairs, guidance from teachers can influence both the selectivity of universities students target and their choice of major. However, relatively little is known about how teachers form recommendations when advising students who differ in gender, academic profiles, and family backgrounds.

The objective of this study is to examine the determinants of teachers’ guidance decisions. We conduct a survey experiment with high school teachers in which respondents evaluate hypothetical student profiles and provide recommendations about suitable university program targets. The profiles randomly vary along several dimensions commonly considered in academic guidance. For each profile, teachers also report expectations about admission prospects and future outcomes.

By randomly varying characteristics of otherwise comparable student profiles, the experiment allows us to identify how teachers incorporate student attributes and contextual information when advising students about university applications, including both the selectivity of the target university and the choice of major. The study contributes to understanding the role of teachers’ expectations and recommendations in shaping students’ educational trajectories during the transition from secondary to higher education.

Registration Citation

Citation
Inoue, Chihiro et al. 2026. "Student Gender and Teachers’ Career Guidance." AEA RCT Registry. March 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17779-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2026-04-24
Intervention End Date
2027-03-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The recommended target university/program for each hypothetical student profile.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Teachers’ subjective expectations about students’ future outcomes associated with different university program choices. These include expectations about admission prospects and longer-run life outcomes.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We conduct a survey experiment with high school teachers. Each participating teacher evaluates a series of hypothetical student profiles and provides recommendations about suitable university targets.

Student profiles vary randomly along several characteristics commonly discussed in academic guidance. For each profile, teachers recommend a target university/program and report expectations about admission prospects and future outcomes.

The experimental design allows us to compare how otherwise similar student profiles receive different recommendations when specific attributes are varied. The goal is to study how teachers incorporate student characteristics when advising students about university applications and university program choices.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization is implemented by computer as part of the online survey platform. Student profile attributes are randomly assigned by the survey software according to a pre-specified randomization procedure.
Randomization Unit
Randomization occurs at the student profile level within each teacher. Each participating teacher evaluates multiple hypothetical student profiles whose attributes are independently randomized.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Approximately 2,400 high school teachers involved in career guidance (e.g., homeroom teachers or teachers responsible for the school’s career guidance activities) in the prefecture. Teachers will be invited to participate through the collaborating local government. The realized number of participating teachers will depend on the response rate.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Approximately 16800 teacher-profile evaluations. Each participating teacher evaluates seven hypothetical student profiles, generating seven observations per teacher.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Student profile attributes are randomized within teachers.
Each teacher evaluates seven profiles in which the randomized attributes vary across profiles. Because attributes are independently randomized, treatment arms are defined by combinations of profile attributes rather than by assignment of teachers to treatment groups.

Across the full sample, observations will be approximately evenly distributed across the possible combinations of randomized attributes. For example, student gender has two arms (male, female), and approximately half of the profile evaluations are expected to be assigned to each.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number