The Impact of Reference-Dependent Preferences on Technology Adoption

Last registered on April 01, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The Impact of Reference-Dependent Preferences on Technology Adoption
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017795
Initial registration date
March 28, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 01, 2026, 10:26 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-04-01
End date
2027-01-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The study examines the behaviour of agents under non-reference-dependent and various reference-dependent preferences. The aim is to demonstrate, using an experimental design, that individuals exhibit endogenous reference points (as postulated in Koszegi and Rabin, 2006). While existing literature establishes that agents form reference points, our study explores the phenomenon in the context of technology adoption. Using endowments and informational asymmetry among individuals, we can identify whether agents exhibit endogenous reference points.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Ramandeep, Ramandeep. 2026. "The Impact of Reference-Dependent Preferences on Technology Adoption." AEA RCT Registry. April 01. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17795-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2026-04-01
Intervention End Date
2027-01-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The primary outcome of the study is a binary variable indicating the decision to buy the technology. The variable equals '1' if the participant chooses to buy/keep the technology. On the other hand, it equals '0' if the participant chooses not to buy/return the technology.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
The primary outcome is directly constructed using the decisions of the participants. For each round in the experiment, the outcome variable takes the value of 1 if the participant chooses to buy (or keep) the technology, and 0 if the participant chooses not to adopt (or return) the technology. No transformation or aggregation of this variable are used in the empirical analysis.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
At the beginning of the experiment, participants are randomly assigned to treatment groups, after which they are shown the corresponding instructions. Participants will complete a comprehension test after reading the instructions to ensure understanding of the experimental procedures. The test will consist of 10 questions based on the information given in the instructions. Following the quiz, the participants proceed to the practice rounds, which allow them to become familiar with the interface of the rounds and all the relevant parameters. Thereafter, the participants will proceed to the main rounds, wherein the rounds they encounter will determine payments. The first main round is a no-policy round. Subsequently, they first encounter the insurance policy, followed by the reward policy. Finally, the participants will end the experiment after completing two additional tasks meant to elicit their loss- and risk-aversion.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
The randomization is determined by a computer using a Python-based function.
Randomization Unit
Randomization is conducted at the individual level. Participants are randomly assigned to treatment groups by the computer. The experiment involves multiple treatment dimensions, all of which are randomized at the individual level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
The planned number of clusters is 150-175 individuals.
Sample size: planned number of observations
The planned number of observations is 300–350 individual-intervention observations, corresponding to 150–175 participants each contributing one observation per intervention (two interventions in total).
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
The experiment uses 4 treatment arms. With a total sample of 150–175 participants, this yields approximately 37–44 individuals per treatment arm, assuming equal allocation. The treatment arms correspond to all combinations of information and endowment.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
The minimum detectable effect (MDE) is 0.20 (i.e. 20 percentage points) for the primary binary outcome. This is based on a baseline probability of 0.35 and assumes balanced assignment across treatment arms. The standard deviation of the outcome is approximately 0.5. With a planned sample size of 150–175 individuals, this corresponds to approximately 81–86% statistical power at the 10% significance level.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Monk Prayogshala Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2026-03-26
IRB Approval Number
223-026