Delivering Foundational Skills, Mentorship, and Agency through Remote Instruction

Last registered on March 10, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Delivering Foundational Skills, Mentorship, and Agency through Remote Instruction
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017807
Initial registration date
January 31, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 10, 2026, 10:11 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
London School of Economics

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Oxford University
PI Affiliation
Oxford University
PI Affiliation
Oxford University
PI Affiliation
University of Chicago
PI Affiliation
London School of Economics

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2025-10-16
End date
2026-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We study the role of remote instruction in building foundational skills and promoting agency and empowerment. We conduct a randomized controlled trial with 2,399 children aged 7–16 in Afghanistan, a setting where access to formal schooling, labor markets, and public life is constrained for girls. The experiment evaluates two phone-based interventions delivered weekly over eight weeks: (i) one-on-one foundational literacy and numeracy tutoring using a teaching-at-the-right-level approach (ConnectEd tutoring arm), and (ii) structured conversations with a trained teacher (Structured conversations arm). A third group serves as a control and receives no intervention.

The study is designed to address four questions. First, can low-tech, remote instruction improve foundational learning in settings of prolonged educational disruption? Second, can this type of instruction lead to gains in agency? Third, are any observed gains in agency driven primarily by skill acquisition itself or by sustained interaction with trained adult mentors? Fourth, are there well-being impacts—positive or negative—of receiving education when structural constraints restrict opportunities?

Primary outcomes include standardized indices of foundational literacy and numeracy as well as agency and empowerment. We measure the latter across five dimensions: (i) curiosity, reasoning, and aspirations; (ii) confidence and self-efficacy; (iii) social capabilities; (iv) parents’ confidence in their child’s capabilities; and (v) civic agency and institutional engagement, using a combination of behavioral tasks, real-effort choices, and incidental indicators. Secondary outcomes include adjacent cognitive skills not taught during the tutoring sessions, child well-being, and household gender attitudes.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Angrist, Noam et al. 2026. "Delivering Foundational Skills, Mentorship, and Agency through Remote Instruction." AEA RCT Registry. March 10. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17807-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The study consists of three experimental arms: (i) ConnectEd Tutoring, (ii) Structured Conversation, or (iii) a control group receiving no intervention.

(i) ConnectEd Tutoring
The intervention in this arm delivers one-on-one instruction in foundational literacy and numeracy with a female teacher through a weekly phone call lasting 25-30 minutes over an eight-week period. Instruction starts with the literacy sequence then the numeracy sequence. Instruction and progression is aligned to the one target child per household using a teaching at the right level approach. A child begins
with literacy instruction at the level determined by a baseline learning assessment. The pedagogy is delivered through structured calling guides that teachers follow to conduct each lesson.

(ii) Structured Conversation
The intervention in this arm delivers a one-on-one structured conversation with a female teacher through a weekly phone call lasting 25-30 minutes over an eight-week period. It explicitly does not provide foundational literacy or numeracy instruction. This
arm is designed to mirror the flow, structure, and length of the ConnectEd Tutoring arm. As in the ConnectEd tutoring arm, teachers follow a structured calling guideline that specifies the questions to ask and the intended flow of the conversation.
Intervention Start Date
2025-12-06
Intervention End Date
2026-01-29

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Foundational literacy and numeracy (Primary)
Empowerment and agency (Primary)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Adjacent cognitive skills (Secondary)
Well-being (Secondary)
Household gender attitudes (Secondary)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We conduct a three-arm randomized controlled trial to estimate the impacts of remote, phone-based interventions on children’s learning and empowerment outcomes in Afghanistan. The study sample consists of 2,399 households, each contributing one target child aged 7–16 and their primary caregiver. The sample was drawn from a household listing exercise covering approximately 10,000 households across 26 provinces and prioritizes girls of the age group with limited access to education.

Following completion of a baseline phone survey and eligibility verification, households were randomly assigned at the household level to one of three arms: (i) ConnectEd Tutoring, (ii) Structured Conversation, or (iii) a control group receiving no intervention. Randomization was stratified on baseline learning level (above/below median), baseline empowerment (above/below median), schooling status (in school/out of school), and child’s primary language (Dari or Pashto), yielding 16 strata, with an additional stratum for boys. Within each stratum, assignment was approximately evenly split across the three arms.

The ConnectEd Tutoring arm delivers weekly one-on-one phone-based instruction in foundational literacy followed by numeracy, using a teaching-at-the-right-level approach, over an eight-week period. The Structured Conversation arm delivers weekly one-on-one phone calls of equal length with a female teacher, focused on guided conversation topics and explicitly excluding academic instruction. The control group receives no calls during the study period. All interventions are delivered by trained teachers and last approximately 25–30 minutes per week.

Primary outcomes are measured via endline phone surveys conducted after the eight-week intervention period and include assessments of foundational literacy and numeracy and adjacent cognitive skills not taught during the tutoring sessions, measures of empowerment and agency, and measures of well being and gender attitudes.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Computer
Randomization Unit
Individual student
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
2,399 students
Sample size: planned number of observations
2,399 students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
801 students to the ConnectEd tutoring arm, 798 to the structured conversation arm and 800 to the control group (no intervention).
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
London School of Economics Research Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2025-01-06
IRB Approval Number
473281
IRB Name
University of Chicago AURA-IRB
IRB Approval Date
2025-10-28
IRB Approval Number
RB25-0382
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information