Digital Advisory Channels for Women Farmers in Malawi

Last registered on February 24, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Digital Advisory Channels for Women Farmers in Malawi
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0017926
Initial registration date
February 20, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 24, 2026, 6:37 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University College Dublin

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Trinity College Dublin
PI Affiliation
University College Dublin

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2026-01-12
End date
2026-03-13
Secondary IDs
Research Ireland and Irish Aid under the SDG Challenge (Ref: 24/FIP/SDG/13388)24/FIP/SDG/13388
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Gender gaps in agricultural productivity persist in Sub-Saharan Africa, in part because women farmers often have less access to timely information, new technologies, and markets, and face heavier time burdens and constraints on decision-making. This study examines whether brief exposure to digital agricultural advice can improve women farmers’ knowledge and short-run decisions in Malawi, and which features of digital services women value most.

We conduct village-based sessions with women farmers recruited through Village Savings and Loan Associations in Mchinji and Mzimba districts. Participants are randomly assigned to receive the same short agricultural advice on soils and soil fertility management through one of two digital channels—(i) SMS and voice messages or (ii) a smartphone app—or to an active control group that views a non-agricultural video. We measure learning and immediate responses after the session, including agricultural knowledge, how easy the channel was to use, and a simple incentivized choice between an agricultural input (fertilizer) and a consumption good (sugar). In a subset of villages, we also ask participants to choose between different hypothetical digital advisory services to learn which service features (such as format, support, market information, and cost) influence preferences.

The study will provide evidence on how the delivery method and design of digital advisory services affect women farmers’ engagement, learning, and short-run decision-making in different cultural and market-access contexts in Malawi.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Bedi, Tara, Supriya Garikipati and Marta Talevi. 2026. "Digital Advisory Channels for Women Farmers in Malawi." AEA RCT Registry. February 24. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.17926-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Participants attend a village-based lab-in-the-field session in which they are randomly assigned to receive short agricultural advisory content on soils and soil fertility management through one of two digital delivery channels: (i) SMS and voice messages, or (ii) a smartphone application (Zaulimi). A third group serves as an active control and views a short WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) video with no agricultural advisory content. The advisory content is identical across treatment arms; only the mode of delivery differs. The intervention is designed to test whether short-run exposure to digital agricultural advisory services, delivered through alternative mobile-based channels, affects women farmers’ agricultural knowledge, perceived usability of digital services, and short-run investment-related decision-making.
Intervention Start Date
2026-01-19
Intervention End Date
2026-03-13

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Primary outcomes for the main RCT (measured at endline: immediate post-exposure):
1. Soil knowledge index (endline, immediate post-exposure): Standardized index of responses on soil types, soil fertility indicators, and soil management practices (measured at baseline and endline; main endpoint is endline).
2. Revealed choice – fertilizer selected (endline, immediate post-exposure): Binary indicator = 1 if participant chooses fertilizer over sugar in the incentivized choice task; 0 otherwise.
3. Comprehension index (endline, immediate post-exposure): Standardized index of understanding/recall and perceived clarity/reliability of the advisory content (treatment arms only).
4. Usability index (endline, immediate post-exposure): Standardized index of perceived ease of use, accessibility, relevance, affordability, and comparative usefulness of the delivery channel (treatment arms only).
5. Self-efficacy index (endline, immediate post-exposure): Standardized index of confidence in applying the advisory information and expecting improved outcomes (treatment arms only).
6. Intention-to-act index (endline, immediate post-exposure): Standardized index of intended use and continued engagement with the advisory information/channel (treatment arms only).
7. Intended number of changes (endline, immediate post-exposure): Count response to “How many changes are you likely to make?”
8. DCE choice outcome (DCE villages; baseline and endline): Choice of preferred DAT option in each discrete choice task, used to estimate preferences/WTP for platform attributes.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Several primary outcomes are constructed as standardized indices from multiple survey items measured at baseline and/or endline. In particular, the Soil Knowledge Index aggregates responses to questions on soil types, soil fertility indicators, and soil management practices. The Comprehension, Usability, Self-efficacy, and Intention-to-Act outcomes are similarly constructed as standardized indices combining multiple Likert-scale items capturing understanding of advisory content, perceived ease of use and relevance of the delivery channel, confidence in applying the information received, and stated intentions to adopt recommended practices.

For each index, individual items will be coded so that higher values correspond to improved knowledge or more positive evaluations, standardized (z-scored), and combined into an additive index following standard procedures used in field experiments. Further, details of on index construction is in the uploaded pre-analysis plan document. The revealed choice outcome (fertilizer vs. sugar) is analysed as a binary indicator and is not constructed from multiple items.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1. Dissemination and spillover index (endline, post-exposure): Standardized index of items capturing participants’ confidence in explaining the advisory information received and intention to share this information within their household or community.
2. Knowledge of written-only (SMS-only) content (endline, SMS/Voice arm only): Binary indicator equal to 1 if the participant correctly answers a knowledge question based on content presented only in the SMS message (and not in the audio message); 0 otherwise.
3. DCE attribute attendance (baseline and endline, DCE villages only): Binary indicators for whether each digital advisory platform attribute (e.g., cost, format, support, contextualization, market information) is reported as driving the participant’s choices in the post-DCE question.
4. Preferred DAT design (post-DCE; endline, DCE villages only): Participant responses to “build your preferred service” questions capturing preferred device, delivery format, level of contextualization, type of in-service support, language, and additional information features.
5. Knowledge Index – DATs (baseline and, where repeated, endline): Standardized index of items capturing awareness and understanding of digital agricultural technologies and current sources/types of agricultural information received via DATs.
6. DAT utilization (baseline and, where repeated, endline): Binary indicator equal to 1 if the participant reports receiving agricultural information through any digital agricultural technology modality within the questionnaire reference period; 0 otherwise.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
The Dissemination and Spillover Index and the Knowledge Index – DATs are constructed as standardized additive indices from multiple survey items coded so that higher values correspond to greater knowledge or higher likelihood of information sharing. Further, details of on index construction is in the uploaded pre-analysis plan document.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The study is an individual-level randomized controlled trial conducted among women members of Village Savings and Loan Associations (VSLAs) in Malawi. Participants attending village-based lab-in-the-field sessions are randomly assigned within session to one of three study arms: (i) receipt of agricultural advisory information via SMS and voice messages, (ii) receipt of the same advisory information via a smartphone application (Zaulimi), or (iii) an active control group that views a non-agricultural video. The advisory content is held constant across treatment arms in order to isolate the effect of delivery modality.

Outcomes are measured through baseline and immediate post-exposure surveys administered during the same session. Primary outcomes include agricultural knowledge and short-run investment-related decision-making, while additional measures capture perceptions of comprehension, usability, and intended use of digital advisory services. A subset of villages also participate in a discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences over digital agricultural advisory platform attributes.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Within each village lab-in-the-field session, eligible participants were randomly assigned at the individual level to one of three experimental arms using a public lottery conducted in the field (1:1:1 allocation; 5 participants per arm).
Randomization Unit
Primary unit of randomization: individual participant (woman farmer) within each village lab-in-the-field session (1:1:1 assignment; 5 participants per arm per session).
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Not a cluster-randomized design; treatment assigned at individual level within each village session.
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,050 women farmers (individual participants)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
350 women (Control – WASH video), 350 women (Treatment 1 – SMS/Voice advisory), 350 women (Treatment 2 – App-based advisory).
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Minimum detectable effect size (MDES): 0.15 standard deviations (SD) for the main outcomes, with N = 1,050 individuals (350 per arm), 80% power and α = 0.05, for comparisons of each treatment arm versus control (and T1 vs T2). Equivalent to a 15% of a standard deviation change in the outcome.
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University College Dublin
IRB Approval Date
2025-03-21
IRB Approval Number
HS-CO-25-033-Garikipati
IRB Name
National Committee on Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities (NCRSH)
IRB Approval Date
2025-05-08
IRB Approval Number
NCST/RTT/2/6
IRB Name
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
IRB Approval Date
2025-02-11
IRB Approval Number
IRB/002/2025
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Digital Agricultural Technologies for Women Farmers in Malawi: How Do Delivery Channels, Platform Attributes, and Revealed Priorities Shape Learning and Decision-Making?

MD5: 38cea172dd369a66735f9dfd9313bf08

SHA1: ea4e57c1c48c46475d23da497d55e53aee4580e2

Uploaded At: February 20, 2026