Cost Perceptions and Household Responses to Carbon Pricing

Last registered on March 05, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Cost Perceptions and Household Responses to Carbon Pricing
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018010
Initial registration date
February 27, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 05, 2026, 8:42 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
IMK

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
IMK
PI Affiliation
IMK

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2026-02-18
End date
2026-03-13
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
In 2021 a carbon pricing scheme for the building and transport sectors was implemented in Germany with fixed prices. With the planned integration of the national emissions trading system into the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS-II) by 2028, carbon prices are expected to rise substantially due to the transition to market-based pricing and a continuously decreasing cap on emission allowances. These anticipated price hikes will increase the financial burden on private households to encourage the adoption of low-carbon technologies. To this point, the diffusion of low-carbon technologies remains limited among private households in Germany. Previous research suggests that individuals are unable to form accurate estimates about the cost implications of price hikes for their household. In this project, we investigate whether the slow adoption of low-carbon technologies in Germany can be explained by misperceptions about the personal cost implications of higher carbon prices. Specifically, we ask whether an underestimation of personal costs at higher carbon prices might cause an underinvestment in low-carbon technologies and limit behavioral responses.

We conduct a tailored information provision experiment to test for the causal effect of individual cost perceptions at higher carbon prices on individuals’ intention to take measures to reduce their household’s carbon costs in the building and transport sectors. The experiment proceeds as follows: We start by asking respondents about their perceived additional costs of carbon pricing at a higher projected price, based on their current energy consumption, and their uncertainty regarding this estimation. To generate exogenous variation in beliefs, we provide random subsamples of respondents with personalized information about their actual costs of carbon pricing at the higher price, which we calculate based on previously reported household characteristics, including detailed information on their energy use. Afterwards, we elicit all respondents’ intention to take measures to reduce the carbon costs of their household. In total, we conduct four separate experiments: one for the building sector and one for the transport sector at a carbon price of 100 euros per ton of CO2, and one for each sector at a carbon price of 200 euros per ton of CO2.

Our experimental design enables us to identify the causal effect of individual cost perceptions on the uptake of measures to reduce carbon costs and investments in low-carbon technologies at the household level. Moreover, the design allows us to examine how respondents differentially incorporate quantitative information depending on their initial misperceptions and the degree of uncertainty surrounding their beliefs.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Behringer, Jan, Lukas Endres and Maike Korsinnek. 2026. "Cost Perceptions and Household Responses to Carbon Pricing." AEA RCT Registry. March 05. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18010-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2026-02-18
Intervention End Date
2026-03-13

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
- Intention to implement cost-reducing measures and make private investments to lower the household’s costs of carbon pricing
- Demand for additional information on reducing the costs of carbon pricing
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
- Carbon price acceptance
- Posterior cost perceptions
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We conduct a survey experiment among approximately 7500 participants representative of the German population. Prior to our experiment, we collect information about participants’ household size, homeowner status, the size of their dwelling, energy consumption for heating purposes, their household’s vehicle fleet and annual vehicle usage. We briefly inform participants about carbon pricing in the building and transport sectors in Germany and ask them to rate how closely they follow information about carbon pricing on a five-point Likert scale.

We randomly assign participants to one of four separate experiments, each providing personalized information about their household’s carbon pricing costs in a specific sector at a given carbon price. Specifically, we implement one experiment for the building sector and one for the transport sector at a price of 100 €/t of CO2, and likewise one experiment for each sector at a price of 200 €/t of CO2. Within each experiment, respondents are randomly assigned to a treatment group that receives personalized cost information or to a control group that does not receive any additional information. Consequently, we have four segments, each including a treatment and a control group of roughly 940 participants.

The experiments begin by asking participants to estimate their household’s additional annual costs of carbon pricing at a given price level and to express their uncertainty regarding their estimation on a five-point Likert scale. 50% of participants are then randomly assigned to receive personalized quantitative information on their household’s actual costs from carbon pricing. Additional heating costs are calculated using the previously collected information on household's annual energy consumption. Additional transportation expenses are inferred from the household's distance traveled and the average fuel consumption of their vehicle fleet. The remaining 50% of participants act as a pure control group and receive no further information. The experiment concludes by eliciting participants’ willingness to undertake carbon cost-reducing measures, their demand for additional information about reducing carbon costs from the consumer advice center, their acceptance of carbon pricing, their trust in the provided information, and their posterior cost estimate. Respondents who indicate no intention to act are further asked to provide an explanation for their decision in an open-ended question.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization was done by the survey institute.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
7500 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
7500 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
7500 individuals with roughly 940 individuals in each treatment or control
group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number