Stories that Shape Us: Evidence from a Gender-Empowering Literacy Program

Last registered on March 05, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Stories that Shape Us: Evidence from a Gender-Empowering Literacy Program
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018025
Initial registration date
March 02, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 05, 2026, 8:58 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Oxford

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Oxford
PI Affiliation
Youth Impact
PI Affiliation
Youth Impact
PI Affiliation
Youth Impact

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-01-01
End date
2026-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
Stories can shape children’s mental models, aspirations, and long-term educational and economic outcomes. Yet the stories children are exposed to often reinforce stereotypes and are hard to change as they are deeply entrenched in rigid school curricula. We conduct novel experimentation in a school setting, integrating empowering messages and non-stereotypical gender representation into a literacy curriculum used in government primary schools in Botswana.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Buchel, Konstantin et al. 2026. "Stories that Shape Us: Evidence from a Gender-Empowering Literacy Program." AEA RCT Registry. March 05. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18025-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention integrates foundational reading instruction with gender-empowering messaging in a school-based literacy program in Botswana. This is delivered during the remedial hour in government primary schools, the program was implemented in partnership with Youth Impact under an MOU with the Ministry of Education. Instruction was targeted to students’ literacy levels using the Teaching at the Right Level approach.

Group A – Status Quo: Teachers developed their own reading lessons using optional guidelines and a resource kit. Materials primarily included descriptive stories on everyday topics (e.g., family, school, animals) without explicit empowerment content.

Group B – Empowering Stories: Teachers were encouraged to use a resource kit with stories embedding messages of gender equality, leadership, perseverance, and non-stereotypical roles. Narratives emphasized agency and role models (e.g., female leaders). Exposure was concentrated among students working at paragraph and story levels, with minimal exposure for letter- and word-level groups.
Intervention Start Date
2024-01-15
Intervention End Date
2025-07-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Economic agency and aspirations – binary variable on students’ agreement with the statement “Girls can do any job they want”

Specific job aspirations - binary from response to open-ended question: “What job do you want to do when you grow up?” Responses will be cleaned and categorized into the occupations with greater than 1% responses.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Economic agency and aspirations – binary variable on students’ agreement with the statement “Boys can do any job they want”

Belief on student ability – binary variable on students’ agreement with the statements “Girls are smarter", "STEM is for girls" and "Math is for girls"

Learning outcomes - continuous variable of students literacy level using ASER assessment.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We conducted a randomized experimental evaluation of empowering stories integrated into a primary school literacy curriculum across six of Botswana’s ten regions. Over five rounds of A/B testing between January 2024 and August 2025, 100 public primary schools (5,616 students in grades 3–5) were randomly assigned to either the status quo content (Group A) or empowering stories (Group B). Schools and implementing staff were blinded to their treatment assignment until training, held one to two days before implementation.

Group A materials featured descriptive stories about households or hobbies, while Group B included empowering, gender-progressive narratives. The intervention was delivered through daily one-hour literacy sessions within a teaching at the right level framework each school term. Only students in paragraph groups and story groups based on baseline learning levels were exposed to empowering stories.

Our analysis draws on anonymized administrative and survey data collected at baseline and endline for each round, including student demographics (e.g., gender, grade) and measures of empowerment outcomes.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
STATA generated randomization
Randomization Unit
School
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
100 schools
Sample size: planned number of observations
5616 students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
A: 2,728 B: 2,888 students
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
BBlavatnik School of Government (BSG) DREC, University of Oxford
IRB Approval Date
2026-02-19
IRB Approval Number
2562142