Adoption and Impacts of a Digital Information Technology: Evidence from Digital Agriculture in Uganda

Last registered on March 12, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Adoption and Impacts of a Digital Information Technology: Evidence from Digital Agriculture in Uganda
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018049
Initial registration date
March 10, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 12, 2026, 4:35 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Princeton University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Stanford University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-03-30
End date
2026-08-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa face severe and persistent information barriers. A new wave of AI-assisted digital information technologies has the potential to overcome these barriers at scale, delivering personalized, hyperlocal agronomic advice at low cost. Yet little is known about the impacts of these technologies and how they diffuse. This pilot study investigates these questions in the context of a novel AI-assisted agricultural advisory tool called Virtual Agronomist. Farmers can use this technology to generate tailored nutrient management plans based on high-resolution soil maps, diagnose plant health and pest problems, and access weather advisories. We investigate the impacts of this tool on farmer practices and agricultural outcomes. We also use this context to study broader questions about how information technologies diffuse. We explore three potential mechanisms. First, because many such technologies deliver information as their primary output, peer adoption may generate information spillovers that permanently substitute for own adoption. Second, in contrast to canonical models where heterogeneity slows diffusion, agricultural heterogeneity may reduce the value of free-riding and accelerate adoption. Finally, information technologies constitute a new information source, changing incentives to form social network connections and potentially amplifying or dampening diffusion. We conduct a randomized experiment across 30 villages in Butaleja District, Eastern Uganda to explore these mechanisms. In 10 villages, farmers adopt the tool directly on their own phones. In a second set of 10 villages, usage is mediated by lead farmers who operate the tool on their behalf. The final 10 villages serve as a control, allowing us to compare adoption rates, feature usage, and agricultural outcomes across dissemination strategies.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Dulin, Robert and Anirudh Sankar. 2026. "Adoption and Impacts of a Digital Information Technology: Evidence from Digital Agriculture in Uganda." AEA RCT Registry. March 12. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18049-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2026-03-30
Intervention End Date
2026-08-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
- Adoption of recommended practices
- Agricultural yields and revenues
- Social network connections
- Adoption of the technology (on extensive margin and intensive margin)
- Number of technology features adopted
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The study uses a village-level randomized controlled trial across 30 villages in Butaleja District, Eastern Uganda. Villages are randomly assigned to one of three arms of equal size. In the control arm (10 villages), no intervention is introduced. In the indirect use arm (10 villages), farmers access the Virtual Agronomist through a lead farmer who operates the tool on their behalf; lead farmers receive a per-plot incentive for each plot registered and each feature used. In the direct use arm (10 villages), farmers adopt the tool independently on their own phones; seed farmers in these villages receive a referral bonus for each farmer they enroll. In each treatment village, lead farmers and seed farmers are randomly selected from a list of village farmers who own smartphones. In all treatment villages, farmers are informed about the tool and shown how to use it in an open village meeting, after which adoption remains voluntary and open at any time.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Computer randomization
Randomization Unit
Randomization will be clustered at the village level. Within villages, lead farmers/seed farmers will be randomly selected from a list of farmers in the village with smartphones. This randomization will occur at the individual level.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
30 villages
Sample size: planned number of observations
360 farmers
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
10 control villages, 10 direct use villages, 10 indirect use villages.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number