Education or Caregiving? The Role of Parental Gender Preferences in Child Educational Investment

Last registered on March 23, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Education or Caregiving? The Role of Parental Gender Preferences in Child Educational Investment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018096
Initial registration date
March 13, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 23, 2026, 7:06 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Yokohama City University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-04-02
End date
2026-04-08
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study investigates how parents in Japan make decisions regarding educational investment in their children. Using a survey-based conjoint experiment, we examine the relative importance of five key factors: the child’s gender, their academic performance (class ranking), expectations for future co-residence or caregiving support, expectations for future financial support (remittances), and perceived personality similarities between the parent and child.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Nakazono, Yoshiyuki. 2026. "Education or Caregiving? The Role of Parental Gender Preferences in Child Educational Investment." AEA RCT Registry. March 23. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18096-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2026-04-02
Intervention End Date
2026-04-08

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The key outcome variables are; (1) Desired Educational Attainment: The specific level of education parents hope a child will reach, measured on a scale from middle school graduation to completing a graduate degree (master’s or doctorate); (2) Relative Resource Allocation: The parental preference for prioritizing educational resources—such as tuition, cram school fees, and lessons—between two hypothetical children with different attribute profiles.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study employs a survey-based conjoint experiment to identify the causal impact of specific child attributes on parental educational investment decisions. Using a survey-based conjoint experiment, we examine the relative importance of five key factors: the child’s gender, their academic performance (class ranking), expectations for future co-residence or caregiving support, expectations for future financial support (remittances), and perceived personality similarities between the parent and child.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization is conducted by a third-party survey provider using a computer-generated algorithm integrated into their online platform
Randomization Unit
To ensure the sample is representative of the Japanese household population, we employ stratified randomization (quota sampling) across 10 distinct strata. These strata are defined by gender (male and female) and five age cohorts in 10-year increments, ranging from 20 to 69 years old (i.e., 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s). The cell proportions are aligned with the latest Japan Census data.

This is a pure conjoint experiment designed to estimate the marginal utility of specific child attributes on parental educational investment decisions. As such, there are no traditional "Treatment" and "Control" arms at the respondent level. Instead, the "treatment" consists of the randomized variation of child-level attributes (e.g., gender, academic aptitude, or personality traits) presented to each respondent across multiple choice tasks.

In each task, respondents are asked to make decisions regarding Relative Resource Allocation between two hypothetical children with different attribute profiles. By analyzing how these randomized variations influence parental preferences for prioritizing resources (such as tuition and cram school fees) and their Desired Educational Attainment, we identify the causal drivers of educational investment without the need for a separate control group. The within-subject variation of the children's profiles serves as the basis for causal inference.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
0 (Note: Randomization is performed at the individual level, not at the cluster level.)
Sample size: planned number of observations
The planned sample size is 1,000 individuals, with approximately 100 participants recruited for each of the 10 demographic strata (gender and age cohorts).
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
The planned sample size is 1,000 individuals, with approximately 100 participants recruited for each of the 10 demographic strata (gender and age cohorts).
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Yokohama City University
IRB Approval Date
2026-03-10
IRB Approval Number
N/A