Profile pictures for experiment on religious hiring discrimination

Last registered on March 31, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Profile pictures for experiment on religious hiring discrimination
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018099
Initial registration date
March 16, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 23, 2026, 7:19 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
March 31, 2026, 5:40 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Ghent University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Ghent University
PI Affiliation
Ghent University

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2026-03-16
End date
2026-03-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The goal of this experiment is to validate a set of AI-generated profile photographs that will later be used in a factorial survey experiment involving recruiters and HR professionals. The photographs are designed to represent young job candidates whose ethnic background is visually ambiguous, while allowing the addition of specific religious cues (e.g., headscarf, cross necklace, beard). The pre-test serves two main objectives. First, it verifies that the baseline photographs do not strongly signal a specific ethnic background. Second, it evaluates whether the selected photographs are comparable in terms of perceived physical attractiveness.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Devos, Louise, Stijn Baert and Louis Lippens. 2026. "Profile pictures for experiment on religious hiring discrimination." AEA RCT Registry. March 31. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18099-2.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Participants evaluate a set of fictitious profile photographs on perceived ethnic origin and physical attractiveness that will be used in a later factorial survey experiment on hiring decisions. Each respondent is randomly shown 12 photographs drawn from a universe of 48 photographs.

The photographs depict individuals intended to represent ethnically ambiguous candidates between West-European and minority origins. The full set contains four categories (12 photographs each):
- Ethnically ambiguous men (Maghrebi–West European)
- Ethnically ambiguous women (Maghrebi–West European)
- Ethnically ambiguous men (Eastern European–West European)
- Ethnically ambiguous women (Eastern European–West European)
Intervention (Hidden)
The photo pretest serves to validate the stimuli used in a factorial vignette experiment on hiring discrimination related to religious identity.

A total of 48 candidate photographs are pretested. Respondents (HR professionals) each evaluate 12 randomly selected photographs. For each photo, they assess the perceived probability that the person is of a given ethnic origin (Maghrebi/Eastern European vs West European) on a 0–10 Likert scale, as well as perceived attractiveness.

Because it proved infeasible to identify a sufficient number of photographs within each category that were statistically equivalent within a ±0.5 margin around the midpoint of the ethnic ambiguity scale, the final selection procedure prioritizes photographs whose mean perceived ethnic origin is as close as possible to the midpoint of 5. The number of photographs selected per category (female Eastern European ambiguous, male Eastern European ambiguous, female Maghrebi ambiguous, male Maghrebi ambiguous) is determined by the requirement that each experimental deck in the main factorial survey contains only unique photographs, thereby increasing realism for respondents. In the main experiment, photograph fixed effects will be included in all regression analyses to control for all photograph characteristics, including perceived ethnicity and physical attractiveness.
Intervention Start Date
2026-03-16
Intervention End Date
2026-03-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
- Perceived ethnic ambiguity (Maghrebi/Eastern European or Western European)
- Perceived attractiveness
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Photographs are selected based on proximity to the midpoint (5) on the 0–10 scale. Any remaining differences between photographs are accounted for in the main factorial survey experiment by including photograph fixed effects in the statistical analyses.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Perceived physical attractiveness of the photographed individual, measured on an 11-point Likert scale (0–10).
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
For each photograph, the mean attractiveness score will be calculated across respondents.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study is a randomized photo evaluation survey. A total of 48 candidate photographs are available. Each respondent evaluates 12 photographs randomly drawn without replacement from the full set.

Participants rate each photograph on:
- perceived ethnic origin;
- perceived physical attractiveness.

Respondents are HR professionals recruited through a research agency.

Participation requires informed consent and agreement with GDPR guidelines. An attention check is included in the survey. Respondents who fail the attention check or who do not provide consent are excluded.

The goal of the study is to identify ethnically ambiguous photographs for use in a subsequent factorial vignette experiment on hiring decisions.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization is conducted automatically by the survey software (Qualtrics) using a computer-generated random assignment. Each respondent receives 12 photographs randomly selected from the set of 48 photographs.
Randomization Unit
The individual respondent.

Photograph assignment occurs at the photo level within respondents, meaning each respondent evaluates a randomized subset of the available photographs.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Not applicable (no clusters).
Sample size: planned number of observations
140 respondents (HR professionals). Each respondent evaluates 12 photographs, resulting in approximately 1,680 photo evaluations.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Not applicable.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials