Abstract
This study replicates and extends an earlier survey (AEARCTR-0018154) that documented how recalled past S&P 500 returns drive expectations of future returns. The original study found that (a) recalled returns predicted expected returns (standardized beta = 0.36--0.41), (b) showing actual returns produced modest upward revisions (+1.9% at 12m, +1.2% at 5y), (c) self-reported surprise amplified the revision, (d) the BGS norm-surprise mechanism was rejected, (e) order and nudge manipulations had no effect, and (f) market recall dominated personal portfolio returns 2.5:1.
The new survey (v6) introduces two major innovations. First, a deception treatment randomly shows some respondents an artificially low 2025 return (5%) instead of the actual return (18%), followed by a debrief that reveals the truth. This separates information anchoring from genuine memory-error correction. Second, a post-reveal "typical annual return" question tests whether the subjective norm itself shifts in response to revealed information. Additional new measures include self-reported optimism and risk aversion.
The pre-registration below codifies the original findings as directional replication hypotheses (R1--R12), formulates new hypotheses for the v6 features (N1--N7), and specifies estimation methods.
(The earlier data will be used also, but the paper plans to report separately if anything changes between earlier data and the to-be-performed data.)