Reducing energy arrears

Last registered on May 04, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Reducing energy arrears
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018522
Initial registration date
April 30, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
May 04, 2026, 8:14 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
The Behaviouralist

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2020-11-17
End date
2025-02-01
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study uses data from four natural field experiments conducted with a gas utility in California. These experiments cover around 700,000 customers. Each experiment tests interventions that are aimed at increasing payment compliance and reducing the risk of disconnection. The first three experiments study reminder design at early stages of the arrears process. They ask if one more reminder increases repayment, whether SMS, email, and outbound calls perform differently, how framing nonpayment as an active choice affects collections, if adding a payment prompt to the regular bill matters, and whether reminders can be improved by making them shorter and more direct. The fourth experiment covers a much later stage in the collections process and examines whether it is more effective to ask customers to pay in full, or instead to request a minimum payment of $400 or $200.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Akesson, Jesper. 2026. "Reducing energy arrears ." AEA RCT Registry. May 04. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18522-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The first three experiments study reminder design at early stages of the arrears process. They ask if one more reminder increases repayment, whether SMS, email, and outbound calls perform differently, how framing nonpayment as an active choice affects collections, if adding a payment prompt to the regular bill matters, and whether reminders can be improved by making them shorter and more direct. The fourth experiment covers a much later stage in the collections process and examines whether it is more effective to ask customers to pay in full, or instead to request a minimum payment of $400 or $200.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2020-11-17
Intervention End Date
2024-04-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Amount paid, the share the paid, the share that called the utility, the share that signed up to programs (e.g., payment extensions, debt forgiveness)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Experiment 1 was a customer-account-level natural field experiment conducted among 427,199 early-arrears accounts at a large U.S. gas utility. Eligible accounts had recently fallen into arrears and had entered the utility’s collections process, but had not yet reached later-stage warning or disconnection steps. Accounts were allocated to one of five groups: business-as-usual control, basic email reminder, active-choice email reminder, autopay email reminder, or basic SMS reminder. The interventions were delivered on November 17, 2020. The experiment was designed to test whether one additional reminder increased repayment, whether reminder framing affected repayment, and whether SMS outperformed email. Outcomes were measured from administrative billing and customer-service records and included cumulative payments over the following four weeks, indicators for any payment and full repayment of the overdue balance, and secondary operational outcomes including customer-service contact and payment extensions.

Experiment 2 was a customer-account-level natural field experiment in the same broad early-arrears setting, with two nested randomized components. First, among 151,022 overdue accounts with balances above $25, the utility randomized whether the next regular bill included an additional reminder sentence at the top of the bill; this created a two-arm comparison between a standard bill and an amended bill. Second, among 95,051 accounts with both an email address and a mobile phone number on file, the utility randomized assignment to one of four reminder conditions delivered four days after bill issuance: no additional reminder, email reminder, SMS reminder, or automated outbound-dial reminder. The experiment was designed to test whether a very low-cost bill-language intervention accelerated repayment and whether reminder channel affected repayment in this setting. Administrative outcomes included cumulative payments over the subsequent four weeks, indicators for any payment and full payment, and secondary outcomes including customer-service calls, autopay registration, and payment extensions.

Experiment 3 was a customer-account-level natural field experiment conducted among 120,209 early-arrears accounts after the utility had already incorporated lessons from the earlier experiments into its standing reminder workflow. Accounts were allocated across five groups: the status-quo reminder sequence and four alternative reminder-content conditions. The four treatment conditions were: a more direct day-4 text, a day-4 text that added the exact amount owed, a day-4 text that added an autopay prompt, and a more direct day-8 email that left the day-4 text unchanged. The experiment was designed to test whether message simplification and more direct wording improved repayment within an already-active reminder sequence, and whether the placement and specific content of those changes mattered. Outcomes were measured from administrative records and included payments one, four, and ten weeks after the day-4 reminder, any payment within ten weeks, and secondary outcomes including later gas usage, autopay enrollment, payment extensions, and receipt of the day-8 reminder.

Experiment 4 was a customer-account-level natural field experiment conducted among 41,650 late-stage arrears households at a large U.S. gas utility. Eligible households had overdue balances of at least $400 and had reached the utility’s collect-or-close stage between May and July 2024. All households remained on the standard collect-or-close workflow, which already included a mailed disconnection-warning notice. Households were allocated to one of four groups: control, a text message requesting a minimum payment of $200, a text message requesting a minimum payment of $400, or a text message requesting payment of the full amount owed. The experiment was designed to test whether varying the requested minimum payment affected repayment behavior in a late-stage collections setting. Administrative outcomes included payments and any payment, as well as secondary outcomes including payment extensions and enrollment in California’s Arrearage Management Plan.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization via Stata
Randomization Unit
Customer-level
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
740,000
Sample size: planned number of observations
740,000
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
740,000
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials