Leadership Turnover and the Stability of Cooperation Standards in Teams

Last registered on May 18, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Leadership Turnover and the Stability of Cooperation Standards in Teams
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018574
Initial registration date
May 15, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
May 18, 2026, 8:17 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Cologne

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-05-21
End date
2026-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This project studies how leadership turnover affects cooperation in teams. Participants take part in a laboratory experiment in groups of four. Three participants make repeated costly effort choices in a team production setting. One participant has a leadership role and can assign sanctions after observing information about individual team members’ behavior. The experiment compares teams in which the leader remains in place with teams in which the leader is replaced after an initial phase of interaction. The study tests whether cooperation changes when the person holding enforcement authority is replaced while the formal production and sanctioning environment remains fixed.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Lübke, Simon Maximilian. 2026. "Leadership Turnover and the Stability of Cooperation Standards in Teams." AEA RCT Registry. May 18. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18574-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Participants take part in a repeated group decision task. Groups consist of three contributors and one leader. Contributors repeatedly choose costly effort in a team production setting. The leader observes information about contributors’ behavior and can assign sanctions subject to limits. The study varies whether the same leader remains assigned to the group in the second part of the task or whether a different leader is assigned.
Intervention Start Date
2026-05-21
Intervention End Date
2026-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Pilot:
• Implementation feasibility of the oTree experiment
• Correct group, role, phase, and leader assignment
• Correct payoff calculation and data export
• Session duration, completion rate, and comprehension check performance

Main study:
• Group level change in average contributor effort around the phase boundary
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Pilot outcomes are feasibility outcomes and are not used to estimate the main treatment effect.

For the main study, average contributor effort is the mean effort of the three contributors in a group and round. The primary outcome is constructed at the group level as average contributor effort in rounds 11 to 13 minus average contributor effort in rounds 8 to 10.

Pilot data are excluded from the confirmatory main analysis.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
• Full phase two change in average contributor effort
• Immediate round 11 change in average contributor effort
• Within group dispersion of contributor effort
• Sanctioning intensity
• Sanction targeting by performance signal
• Contributor payoffs
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
• Full phase two change: average contributor effort in rounds 11 to 20 minus average contributor effort in rounds 6 to 10
• Immediate round 11 change: average contributor effort in round 11 minus average contributor effort in rounds 8 to 10
• Within group dispersion: standard deviation of contributor effort within a group and round, averaged over the relevant window
• Sanctioning intensity: total sanction points assigned by the leader per group and round
• Sanction targeting: mean sanction points assigned to contributors by observed performance signal category
• Contributor payoffs: average contributor payoff at the group round level, reported before and after sanctions where applicable

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The project is a laboratory experiment with a pilot stage followed by a planned main study. Participants interact in groups of four. Three participants repeatedly choose costly effort in a team production task, while one participant acts as leader. The interaction has two phases. The study varies whether the same leader remains assigned in the second phase or whether the group receives a different leader. The leader can assign sanctions after observing information about group performance. Pilot data will be used only for feasibility checks and will not be included in the confirmatory main analysis.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Computer randomization implemented in oTree during laboratory sessions.
Randomization Unit
There are two levels of randomization. First, participants are randomly assigned to groups of four and to roles within groups, with three contributors and one leader per group. Second, treatment assignment is at the group level: each contributor group is assigned to either the turnover condition or the control condition.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Currently planned main study: 40 contributor groups, with 20 groups assigned to control and 20 groups assigned to turnover. The final main study sample size may be revised after the pilot and before main study data collection, based on feasibility, session timing, dropout, payment range, implementation constraints, and power calibration. Pilot groups are used for feasibility checks only and are excluded from the confirmatory main analysis.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Currently planned main study: 160 participants, with four participants per contributor group. The final number of participants may be revised after the pilot and before main study data collection if feasibility or power calibration requires a change. Pilot participants are excluded from the confirmatory main analysis.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Currently planned main study: 20 contributor groups assigned to control and 20 contributor groups assigned to turnover. The final allocation may be revised after the pilot and before confirmatory main data collection. Any revision will be documented before the main study starts and will not be based on estimated treatment effects from the pilot.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
German Association for Experimental Economic Research e.V.
IRB Approval Date
2026-05-15
IRB Approval Number
nXu9J72x