Privacy, Truth-Telling, and Data Quality: Experimental Evidence on Sensitive Questions Measurement in Surveys

Last registered on June 22, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Privacy, Truth-Telling, and Data Quality: Experimental Evidence on Sensitive Questions Measurement in Surveys
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018619
Initial registration date
June 16, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 22, 2026, 6:49 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Inter-American Development Bank

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Inter-Amercian Development Bank
PI Affiliation
Inter-Amercian Development Bank

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2026-06-17
End date
2026-08-06
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Household surveys routinely include questions on sensitive topics, yet responses are widely believed to underestimate true prevalence due to social desirability bias. This study reports on a survey experiment in the urban area of the Metropolitan Region of Chile, randomly assigning 1,260 households to a text-only computer-assisted self-interview (CASI) or an audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI), in which respondents listen to questions through headphones. We estimate the effect of audio assistance on disclosure rates for sensitive items related to gender identity, sexual orientation, discrimination, violence, self-harm and mental health. We further examine effects on item nonresponse and a range of response quality indicators derived from questionnaire responses and survey paradata. Placebo items are included to distinguish privacy-driven effects from changes in comprehension or attentiveness. Within each household, mental health items (PHQ-4) are duplicated across interviewer-administered (CAPI) and self-administered modes, with the order of these components independently randomized, to compare the gap between interviewer- and self-administered measurement across the CASI and ACASI arms.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Medellin, Nadin, Ercio Muñoz and Melanie Saavedra. 2026. "Privacy, Truth-Telling, and Data Quality: Experimental Evidence on Sensitive Questions Measurement in Surveys." AEA RCT Registry. June 22. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18619-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention is the mode used to administer the self-administered sections of the individual questionnaire (the mental health section and the sensitive block). Households assigned to the control arm administer these sections via text-only computer-assisted self-interviewing (CASI): the interviewer hands the device to the selected respondent, who reads the questions on screen and inputs responses directly. Households assigned to the treatment arm administer the same sections via audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI): the selected respondent uses individual headphones to listen to the questions and response options through audio and inputs responses on the device. Question wording, response options, and skip patterns are identical across arms. The sensitive block covers items on gender identity, sexual orientation, discrimination, violence, and self-harm behaviors, and also includes placebo items. Prior to the first self-administered section, all respondents complete a brief practice item to familiarize them with the assigned mode. Interviewers follow a privacy protocol during the self-administered sections, ensuring the screen is not visible to third parties and maintaining appropriate spacing.
Intervention Start Date
2026-06-17
Intervention End Date
2026-08-06

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
(i) Disclosure of sensitive items in the self-administered block, measured as standardized family-level disclosure indices for four item families: (a) gender identity and sexual orientation, (b) discrimination, (c) violence, and (d) self-harm behaviors. (ii) Item nonresponse rates in the sensitive block. (iii) Response quality indicators for the sensitive block, derived from survey paradata and questionnaire responses.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
For each sensitive item, disclosure is defined as a binary indicator equal to 1 if the respondent provides an affirmative or non-default response, 0 otherwise. The primary disclosure outcomes are family-level indices. For each family, a family-level disclosure rate is computed as an indicator equal to 1 if the respondent discloses at least one item within the family, and this rate is standardized to mean 0 and standard deviation 1 in the control arm. In addition, a covariance-weighted index is constructed for each family. Individual items are reported for descriptive and exploratory purposes. Item nonresponse is defined, for each item, as an indicator equal to 1 if the response is "Don't know," "Prefer not to answer," or missing, aggregated at the family and full-block level as the share of items unanswered. Paradata-based quality indicators are constructed from response timing and behavior captured by Survey Solutions and may include response times, item nonresponse, and completion patterns.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Survey duration (total and by module), breakoff rates (partial completion of the sensitive block), and the difference in mental health responses between the interviewer-administered (CAPI) and self-administered modes, compared across the CASI and ACASI arms.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Survey duration is measured in minutes from paradata timestamps, computed overall and separately for the sensitive block. Breakoff is defined as a respondent starting but not completing the self-administered sensitive block. The mental health items are administered twice to each respondent (once in the interviewer-administered mode and once in the assigned self-administered mode) and the difference between the two scores is computed for each respondent.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This is a household-level randomized controlled trial conducted in urban areas of the Metropolitan Region of Chile. A target of 1,260 households is randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either text-only computer-assisted self-interviewing (CASI, control, 630 households) or audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI, treatment, 630 households) for the sensitive block of the individual questionnaire. Within each household, one eligible member aged 14 or older is randomly selected to complete the individual questionnaire, which combines an interviewer-administered (CAPI) component and the assigned self-administered (CASI or ACASI) component. Independently of the mode assignment, households are randomized 1:1 to one of two orderings of these two components: CAPI-first/self-second or self-first/CAPI-second. Mental health items (PHQ-4) are duplicated across the CAPI and self-administered components; because each respondent is assigned to only one self-administered mode, this allows the gap between interviewer- and self-administered measurement to be compared across the CASI and ACASI arms, with the order randomization allowing identification of this contrast net of order or fatigue effects. The household sample is selected through a stratified multistage probability design with five geographic strata corresponding to zones of Greater Santiago (Centro, Norte, Oriente, Poniente, Sur).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Both the mode assignment (CASI vs. ACASI) and the order assignment (CAPI-first vs. self-first) are determined by the Survey Solutions (SUSO) electronic questionnaire. The assigned mode and order are revealed to the interviewer by the device only after the household module has been completed and the eligible respondent has been randomly selected by the software. The interviewer has no role in, and no discretion over, the mode or order assigned to each household.
Randomization Unit
Household level. The primary intervention (CASI vs. ACASI) and the secondary order randomization (CAPI-first vs. self-first) are both assigned at the household level in a 1:1 ratio, independently of each other. Within each household, one eligible member aged 14 or older is randomly selected by the software to complete the individual questionnaire.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
1260 households
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,260 individuals (one randomly selected eligible member aged 14 or older per household)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
630 households CASI (control), 630 households ACASI (treatment). Independently, 630 households CAPI-first ordering and 630 households self-administered-first ordering. The crossing of the two randomizations yields four implementation arms of approximately 315 households each: (i) CASI / CAPI-first, (ii) CASI / self-first, (iii) ACASI / CAPI-first, (iv) ACASI / self-first.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Sample size was determined by operational and budgetary constraints, with a target of 1,260 households (630 per mode arm). We report minimum detectable effects (MDEs) assuming 80% power, a two-sided test at the 5% level, and 1:1 allocation across mode arms. Mode is randomized at the household level with one individual per household, so the unit of analysis matches the unit of randomization and no clustering adjustment is required.  The primary disclosure outcomes are family-level indices. For the binary "any disclosure" family indicator, the MDE ranges from about 4.7 pp at a baseline prevalence of 10% to 7.9 pp at 50%; because this indicator is satisfied by disclosure on any single item, its baseline prevalence is mechanically higher than that of the individual items, placing the relevant comparisons in the better-powered range. For reference, recent work documents ACASI disclosure gains of 4–7 pp for lifetime intimate partner violence (Peterman et al., 2025) and 5–18 pp for IPV indices in rural Liberia and Malawi (Park et al., 2025).
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Pearl IRB
IRB Approval Date
2026-05-08
IRB Approval Number
2026-0263
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information