Designing Financial Protection against Heat Exposure for Gig-workers: Evidence on Timing, Certainty, and Repayment

Last registered on August 27, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Designing Financial Protection against Heat Exposure for Gig-workers: Evidence on Timing, Certainty, and Repayment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018642
Initial registration date
August 24, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
August 27, 2026, 12:25 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Michigan

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2026-03-23
End date
2026-10-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Extreme heat poses significant risks to the health, earnings, and labor supply of low-income gig workers, particularly in settings with limited access to formal risk-coping mechanisms. This study evaluates whether timely access to liquidity—through forecast-contingent cash transfers and zero-interest credit—enables workers to better adapt to heat stress. We conduct a randomized controlled trial among 1,200 two-wheeler delivery workers in Delhi NCR during the peak summer months of 2026. Workers are individually randomized into six groups: a control group receiving heatwave information only, and five treatment groups receiving information combined with either general-purpose credit, heat-contingent credit of varying amounts, or automatic cash transfers triggered by heatwave events.

Interventions are linked to heatwave forecasts issued by the India Meteorological Department, with financial support delivered at the onset of heatwave episodes or made accessible during predefined windows. Using high-frequency panel data collected through weekly surveys and administrative transaction records from a fintech partner, the study estimates the impact of these interventions on labor supply, earnings, financial behavior, and health outcomes. The empirical strategy exploits both cross-sectional treatment variation and temporal variation in heat exposure, including interaction effects between treatment assignment and heatwave days.
This study contributes to a growing literature on climate adaptation and financial inclusion by testing whether liquidity-based instruments—delivered in real time and conditional on environmental shocks—can improve worker welfare and enable safer, more optimal labor supply decisions under extreme heat.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Nyshadham, Anant. 2026. "Designing Financial Protection against Heat Exposure for Gig-workers: Evidence on Timing, Certainty, and Repayment." AEA RCT Registry. August 27. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18642-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2026-05-01
Intervention End Date
2026-07-15

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. Labor Supply and Work Patterns
2. Earnings
3. Financial Behavior and Liquidity Use
4. Health and Well-being
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
1. Labor Supply and Work Patterns
Indicator for working on a given day (extensive margin)
Total hours worked (daily/weekly)
Number of delivery trips completed
Share of work conducted during peak heat hours (11am–4pm)
Incidence of stopping or reducing work due to heat

2. Earnings
Total daily and weekly earnings (including base pay, incentives, and bonuses)
Earnings per trip
Income losses associated with heat exposure (e.g., reduced earnings on heatwave days)

3. Financial Behavior and Liquidity Use
Uptake and usage of provided financial products (credit withdrawal / transfer receipt)
Reliance on informal borrowing (friends, family, moneylenders)
Use of alternative formal or digital credit sources
Ability to manage short-term expenses (self-reported liquidity constraints)

4. Health and Well-being
Incidence of heat-related symptoms (e.g., fatigue, dizziness)
Days unable to work due to illness
Self-reported physical and mental well-being
Health-related expenditures

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study is a randomized controlled trial evaluating whether timely access to liquidity improves workers’ ability to cope with extreme heat. The sample consists of 1,200 two-wheeler delivery workers in Delhi NCR, recruited through a fintech partner and field outreach. Eligible workers are adults currently engaged in delivery work and using a smartphone with digital payment access.

Participants are individually randomized into six groups: a control group that receives heatwave information only, and five treatment groups that receive information combined with different forms of financial support. These include (i) access to a general-purpose zero-interest credit line, (ii) access to heat-contingent zero-interest credit of varying amounts, and (iii) automatic cash transfers of varying amounts triggered by heatwave events.

Heatwave events are defined based on official weather alerts issued by the India Meteorological Department. Financial support in relevant treatment arms is either disbursed automatically at the onset of such events (cash transfers) or made available for withdrawal during predefined windows (credit products). All participants receive standardized heatwave forecasts and safety information via mobile messaging.
Data are collected through a baseline survey, high-frequency follow-up surveys during the intervention period, and an endline survey. These survey data are complemented by data on financial transactions from the implementing partner.

The study evaluates impacts on labor supply, earnings, financial behavior, and health outcomes, and leverages both variation in treatment assignment and temporal variation in heat exposure.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization is conducted in office by a computer using statistical software (Stata). Eligible participants from the baseline sample are individually assigned to one of six study arms using stratified randomization. Assignment is implemented through a reproducible code-based procedure with a fixed random seed, and re-randomization is used to ensure balance on key baseline covariates across groups.
Randomization Unit
The unit of randomization is the individual worker. All eligible participants are individually assigned to one of the six study arms.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
NA
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,200
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Control (Information only): 225 workers
Treatment 1 (Information + General Credit): 225 workers
Treatment 2 (Information + Heat-Contingent Credit – Low): 150 workers
Treatment 3 (Information + Heat-Contingent Credit – High): 225 workers
Treatment 4 (Information + Cash Transfer – Low): 150 workers
Treatment 5 (Information + Cash Transfer – High): 225 workers
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Good Business Lab Foundation Institutional Review Board (GBL-IRB)
IRB Approval Date
2025-12-08
IRB Approval Number
GBL20251201
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information