A Double-Edged Sword? The Benefits and Hidden Costs of next-gen LLIN-Based Malaria Prevention - RCT Evidence from Benin

Last registered on June 03, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
A Double-Edged Sword? The Benefits and Hidden Costs of next-gen LLIN-Based Malaria Prevention - RCT Evidence from Benin
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0018686
Initial registration date
May 28, 2026

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 03, 2026, 9:00 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
CNRS CREM

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
CNRS CREM
PI Affiliation
CES

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2027-07-01
End date
2028-09-30
Secondary IDs
Grant n°ENV202409018954 by Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study evaluates the long-run impacts of different long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) used for malaria prevention in Benin. Using follow-up data from a prior cluster-randomized trial, the project examines how alternative LLIN formulations affect child health, development, and human capital outcomes, while also exploring behavioral mechanisms related to net use and retention. The study contributes evidence on the benefits and potential unintended consequences of next-generation malaria prevention technologies.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Spychala, Ariane, Josselin Thuilliez and Nouhoum Touré. 2026. "A Double-Edged Sword? The Benefits and Hidden Costs of next-gen LLIN-Based Malaria Prevention - RCT Evidence from Benin." AEA RCT Registry. June 03. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.18686-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The study follows up a cluster-randomized trial in which villages were assigned to receive different types of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) for malaria prevention in Benin. The intervention consisted of the distribution of LLINs at standard coverage levels by trained health workers under Ministry of Health protocols. This follow-up study does not introduce any new intervention; it collects post-intervention data on households originally assigned to different LLIN types.
Intervention Start Date
2027-07-01
Intervention End Date
2028-09-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Health outcomes (malaria RDT results, hemoglobin levels, anthropometric measures), cognition and education outcomes (Raven matrices, digit span tests, school attendance, educational attainment), and net use behavior (declaration, observation and monitoring when possible)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Outcomes are measured using standardized survey instruments, biomarker collection, and cognitive assessments. Health outcomes are constructed from malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), hemoglobin measurements, and anthropometric indicators. Cognitive and educational outcomes are based on standardized tests of non-verbal reasoning, working memory, attention, and literacy/numeracy, and are aggregated into domain-specific indices after normalization where appropriate. Net use behavior is measured using a combination of self-reported use and direct observation, and is summarized in behavioral indicators and indices. Where relevant, outcomes within each domain are standardized prior to aggregation to facilitate comparison across measures.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Beliefs and perceptions regarding malaria prevention and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), including perceived effectiveness, safety, comfort, and attitudes toward net use.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary outcomes consist of survey-based measures of beliefs and perceptions regarding malaria prevention and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), including perceived effectiveness, safety, and comfort. These outcomes are elicited using standardized Likert-scale questions and, where relevant, combined into summary indices after normalization.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study uses long-term follow-up data from a cluster-randomized trial of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) conducted in Benin. Villages were originally randomized to receive different LLIN formulations. The present study collects new survey, biomarker, and cognitive data approximately seven to eight years after the original intervention. No new intervention is implemented; the study estimates long-run effects of original treatment assignment on child health, cognitive development, educational outcomes, and behavioral responses.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
The original cohort was selected from approximately 55,000 households using simple random sampling within villages. Within each of 60 villages, 30 children aged 6 months to 9 years were selected using a random number generator, yielding an initial sample of approximately 1,800 children.
Randomization Unit
Randomization was conducted at the village level, with 60 villages assigned to one of three LLIN arms. Within villages, households and children were sampled for follow-up data collection.

For the Randomized Survey Experiment, second randomization at the household level, within those treatment arms with 3 framings again, with around 170 per framing group per initial treatment arm.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
60 villages.
Sample size: planned number of observations
The original baseline sample included approximately 1,800 children. We expect to re-contact a subset of this cohort in the follow-up survey due to attrition (e.g., migration, mortality, or non-response), yielding an analytical sample of approximately 1,500 children and 1,500 adult caregivers.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
20 villages with pyrethroid-only LLINs, 20 villages with pyriproxyfen-pyrethroid LLINs, 20 villages with pyrethroid-chlorfenapyr LLINs.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Accounting for clustering at the village level (60 clusters, ~1,500 children total), the study can detect a minimum standardized effect size of approximately 0.14–0.19 standard deviations for pairwise comparisons of main outcomes at the child level, corresponding to about 14–19% of a standard deviation.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number